August 1, 2024
On the same day
that Israeli forces bombed a girls’ school in central Gaza, killing at least 30
people and injuring over 100, Israel’s soccer team was allowed to compete
without sanctions at the 2024 Paris Olympics. Even though Paraguay defeated
Israel 4-2, TRNN’s Dave Zirin reports that “Israel actually won this, because
they were allowed to play at all.” In this on-the-ground report from Paris,
Zirin covers the protests and politics surrounding Saturday’s soccer match.
Fans with Flag of Palestine open a banner written 'Genocide
Olympics' during the Men's group D match between Israel and Paraguay
during the Paris 2024 Olympic Games at Parc des Princes stadium in
Paris, France on July 27, 2024. Photo by Mustafa Yalcin/Anadolu via
Getty Images
Dave Zirin:
Hey, this is
Dave Zirin from Edge of Sports TV, only on the Real News Network. I’m here
standing outside, Parc des Princes Stadium here in Paris, where the Israeli
soccer team is about to take on Paraguay. Now, why am I here? Because the
question about Israeli athletes and them having the permission to play in these
games is one of the hot-button issues in Paris right now, and frankly around
the world, particularly on this day of all days where an Israeli airstrike
killed 30 people sheltering in a school in Gaza. So we’re wondering, are there
going to be protests here? You hear some noise in the background. What are
those protests going to look like? We’re going to find out right here at the
stadium. Maybe there’ll be nothing. Maybe there’ll be something. But I’m
excited to find out, because the resistance at these Olympics are the politics
they do not want to talk about.
Just a few
things about the mood outside the stadium. You do see some folks in Israeli
flags. I’m not seeing yet Palestinian flags, but Paraguay has shown up in a big
way. So that’s something, and we’re going to keep recording and keep finding
out what’s happening as Israel meets Paraguay at a contest where a lot of
people think Israel has no place on the field.
The security
outside the Israel-Paraguay game, it was like nothing you can imagine and
nothing I’ve ever experienced before a sporting event. Incredible amount of
police, your body was checked twice, machine guns everywhere, and yet despite
all of that, look at this man, in a wheelchair, with a Palestinian flag,
somehow got it into the arena. I got to tell you, if he was able to do all
that, it’s actually humbling to think about what he went through. Humbling to
think about how important it was for him to make a statement of dissent against
Israel’s presence.
Okay, the match
is over. Paraguay won four to two over Israel, but that’s not the story here.
Because Israel in a way, actually won this because they were able to play at
all, and that’s a problem. Here’s the problem at play. Look, Israel should not
be in these games at all because of what’s called sportswashing. Right now,
Israel is acting like a pariah nation. It is bombing Gaza. It is bombing Rafah,
and yet they are allowed to come to these games and be sports washed and
accepted as a legitimate part of the international sports community and the
international community. And that’s the problem.
A huge number of
Israeli players are members of the Israeli Armed Forces, and yet here they are
playing. Meanwhile, Russia was sanctioned because many of their players were on
the Russian Armed Forces. The hypocrisy is blaring, and yet their Israel was. Their
national anthem played, a whole stadium of people stood up and paid respect.
There were Israeli flags everywhere. And this is the problem, and that is
exactly why we need to be vigilant about saying that Israel has no place in
international sports competition as long as it is acting like a settler
colonial estate. For Edge of Sports TV, I’m Dave Zirin.
More Dead Children.More BBC ‘News’ Channeling Israeli Propaganda as Its Own
Jonathan Cook
BBC coverage of the attack on a
football pitch in the Golan Heights on Saturday has been intentionally
misleading.
The BBC’s evening news entirely
ignored the fact that those killed by the blast are a dozen Syrians, not
Israeli citizens, and that for decades the surviving Syrian population in the
Golan, most of them Druze, has been forced to live unwillingly under an Israeli
military occupation.
I suppose mention of this context
might complicate the story Israel and the BBC wish to tell – and risk reminding
viewers that Israel is a belligerent state occupying not just Palestinian
territory but Syrian territory too (not to mention nearby Lebanese territory).
It might suggest to audiences that
these various permanent Israeli occupations have been contributing not only to
large-scale human rights abuses but to regional tensions as well. That Israel’s
acts of aggression against its neighbors might be the cause of “conflict”,
rather than, as Israel and the BBC would have us believe, some kind of unusual,
pre-emptive form of self-defense.
The BBC, of course, chose to
uncritically air comments from a military spokesman for Israel, who blamed
Hizbullah for the blast in the Golan.
Daniel Hagari tried to milk the
incident for maximum propaganda value, arguing: “This attack shows the true
face of Hizbullah, a terrorist organization that targets and murders children
playing soccer.”
Except, as the BBC failed to mention
in its report, Israel infamously targeted and murdered four young children from
the Bakr family playing football on a beach in Gaza in 2014.
Much more recently, video footage
showed Israel striking yet more children playing football at a school in Gaza
that was serving as a shelter for families whose homes were destroyed by
earlier Israeli bombs.
Doubtless other strikes in Gaza over
the past 10 months, so many of them targeting school-shelters, have killed
Palestinian children playing football – especially as it is one of the very few
ways they can take their mind off the horror all around.
So, should we – and the BBC – not
conclude that all these attacks on children playing football make the Israeli
military even more of a terrorist organization than Hizbullah?
Note too the way the western media
are so ready to accept unquestioningly Israel’s claim that Hizbullah was
responsible for the blast – and dismiss Hizbullah’s denials.
Viewers are discouraged from
exercising their memories. Any who do may recall that those same media outlets
were only too willing to take on faith Israeli disinformation suggesting that
Hamas had hit Gaza’s al-Ahli hospital back in October, even when all the
evidence showed it was an Israeli air strike.
(Israel soon went on to destroy all
Gaza’s hospitals, effectively eradicating the enclave’s health sector, on the
pretext that medical facilities there served as Hamas bases – another patently
preposterous claim the western media treated with wide-eyed credulity.)
The BBC next went to Jerusalem to
hear from diplomatic editor Paul Adams. He intoned gravely: “This is precisely
what we have been worrying about for the past 10 months – that something of
this magnitude would occur on the northern border, that would turn what has
been a simmering conflict for all of these months into an all-out war.”
So there you have it. Paul Adams and
the BBC concede they haven’t been worrying for the past 10 months about the
genocide unfolding under their very noses in Gaza, or its consequences.
A genocide of Palestinians,
apparently, is not something of significant “magnitude”.
Only now, when Israel can exploit
the deaths of Syrians forced to live under its military rule as a pretext to
expand its “war”, are we supposed to sit up and take notice. Or so the BBC
tells us.
No comments:
Post a Comment