By Jacob G. Hornberger
May 27, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
Just consider the accusations that have been leveled at
the president:
- He
has betrayed the Constitution, which he swore to uphold.
- He has
committed treason by befriending Russia and other enemies of America.
- He
has subjugated America’s interests to Moscow.
- He
has been caught in fantastic lies to the American people, including
personal ones, like his previous marriage and divorce.
President Donald Trump?
No, President John F. Kennedy.
What lots of Americans don’t realize, because it was
kept secret from them for so long, is that what Trump has been enduring from
the national-security establishment, the mainstream press, and the American
right-wing for his outreach to, or “collusion with,” Russia pales compared to
what Kennedy had to endure for committing the heinous “crime” of reaching out
to Russia and the rest of the Soviet Union in a spirit of peace and friendship.
They hated him for it. They abused him. They insulted
him. They belittled him. They called him naïve. They said he was a traitor.
All of the nasties listed above, plus more, were
contained in an advertisement and a flier that appeared in Dallas on the
morning of November 22, 1963, the day that Kennedy was assassinated. They can
be read here and here.
Ever since then, some people have tried to make it seem
like the advertisement and flier expressed only the feelings of extreme
right-wingers in Dallas. That’s nonsense. They expressed the deeply held
convictions of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the CIA, the conservative movement,
and many people within the mainstream media and Washington establishment.
In June 1963, Kennedy threw down the gauntlet in a
speech he delivered at American University, now entitled the “Peace Speech.” It was one of the most
remarkable speeches ever delivered by an American president. It was broadcast
all across the communist Soviet Union, the first time that had ever been done.
In the speech, Kennedy announced that he was bringing
an end to the Cold War and the mindset of hostility toward Russia and the rest
of the Soviet Union that the U.S. national-security establishment had
inculcated in the minds of the American people ever since the end of World War
II.
It was a radical notion and, as Kennedy well
understood, a very dangerous one insofar as he was concerned. The Cold War
against America’s World War II partner and ally had been used to convert the
United States from a limited-government republic to a national-security state,
one consisting of a vast, permanent military establishment, the CIA, and the
NSA, along with their broad array of totalitarian-like powers, such as
assassination, regime change, coups, invasions, torture, surveillance, and the
like. Everyone was convinced that the Cold War — and the so-called threat from
the international communist conspiracy that was supposedly based in Russia —
would last forever, which would naturally mean permanent and ever-increasing
largess for what Kennedy’s predecessor, President Dwight Eisenhower, had
called the “military-industrial complex.”
Suddenly, Kennedy was upending the Cold War apple cart
by threatening to establish a relationship of friendship and peaceful
coexistence with Russia, the rest of the Soviet Union, and Cuba.
Kennedy knew full well that his actions were considered
by some to be a grave threat to “national security.” After all, don’t forget
that it was Guatemalan President Jacobo Arbenz’s outreach to the Soviets in a
spirit of friendship that got him ousted from power by the CIA and presumably
targeted for assassination as part of that regime-change operation. It was
Cuban leader Fidel Castro’s outreach to the Soviets in a spirit of friendship
that made him the target of Pentagon and CIA regime-change operations,
including through invasion, assassination, and sanctions. It was Congo leader’s
Patrice Lamumba’s outreach to the Soviets in a spirit of friendship that got
him targeted for assassination by the CIA. It would be Chilean President
Salvador Allende’s outreach to the Soviets in a spirit of friendship that got
him targeted in a CIA-instigated coup in Chile that resulted in Allende’s
death.
Kennedy wasn’t dumb. He knew what he was up against. He
had heard Eisenhower warn the American people in his Farewell Address about the
dangers to their freedom and democratic way of life posed by the military
establishment. After Kennedy had read the novel Seven Days in May, which
posited the danger of a military coup in America, he asked friends in Hollywood
to make it into a movie to serve as a warning to the American people. In the
midst of the Cuban Missile Crisis, when the Pentagon and the CIA were exerting extreme
pressure on Kennedy to bomb and invade Cuba, his brother Bobby told a Soviet
official with whom he was negotiating that the president was under a severe
threat of being ousted in a coup. And, of course, Kennedy was fully mindful of
what had happened to Arbenz, Lamumba, and Castro for doing what Kennedy was now
doing — reaching out to the Soviets in a spirit of friendship.
In the eyes of the national-security establishment, one
simply did not reach out to Russia, Cuba, or any other “enemy” of America.
Doing so, in their eyes, made Kennedy an appeaser, betrayer, traitor, and a
threat to “national security.”
Kennedy didn’t stop with his Peace Speech. He also
began negotiating a treaty with the Soviets to end above-ground nuclear
testing, an action that incurred even more anger and ire within the Pentagon
and the CIA. Yes, that’s right — they said that “national security” depended on
the U.S. government’s continuing to do what they object to North Korea doing
today — conducting nuclear tests, both above ground and below ground.
Kennedy mobilized public opinion to overcome fierce
opposition in the military, CIA, Congress, and the Washington establishment to
secure passage of his Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.
He then ordered a partial withdrawal of troops from Vietnam,
and told close aides that he would order a complete pull-out after winning the
1964 election. In the eyes of the U.S. national-security establishment, leaving
Vietnam subject to a communist takeover would pose a grave threat to national
security here in the United States.
Worst of all, from the standpoint of the
national-security establishment, Kennedy began secret personal negotiations
with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev and Cuban leader Fidel Castro to bring an
end to America’s Cold War against them. That was considered to be a grave
threat to “national security” as well as a grave threat to all the military and
intelligence largess that depended on the Cold War.
By this time, Kennedy’s war with the national-security
establishment was in full swing. He had already vowed to tear the CIA into a
thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds after its perfidious conduct in the
Bay of Pigs fiasco. By this time, he had also lost all confidence in the
military after it proposed an all-out surprise nuclear attack on the Soviet
Union, much as Japan had done at Pearl Harbor, after the infamous plan known as
Operation Northwoods, which proposed terrorist attacks and plane hijackings
carried out by U.S. agents posing as Cuban communists, so as to provide a pretext
for invading Cuba, and after the Cuban Missile Crisis, when the military
establishment accused him of appeasement and treason for agreeing not to ever
invade Cuba again.
What Kennedy didn’t know was that his “secret”
negotiations with the Soviet and Cuban communists weren’t so secret after all.
As it turns out, it was a virtual certainty that the CIA (or NSA) was listening
in on telephone conversations of Cuban officials at the UN in New York City,
much as the CIA and NSA still do today, during which they would have learned
what the president was secretly doing behind their backs.
Kennedy’s feelings toward the people who were calling
him a traitor for befriending Moscow and other “enemies” of America? In
response to the things that were said in that advertisement and flier about him
being a traitor for befriending Russia, he told his wife Jackie on the morning
he was assassinated: “We are heading into nut country today.” Of course, as he
well knew, the nuts weren’t located only in Dallas. They were also situated
throughout the U.S. national-security establishment.
For more information, attend The Future of Freedom
Foundation’s one-day conference
on June 3, 2017, entitled “The National Security State and JFK” at the
Washington Dulles Marriott Hotel.
Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The
Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and
received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law
degree from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years
in Texas. He also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where
he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to
become director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education.
This article was first published by The Future of Freedom Foundation -
The views expressed in this article are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing
House.
