February
23, 2023
Iran
on Thursday directly acknowledged an accusation attributed to international
inspectors that it enriched uranium to 84% purity for the first time, which
would put the Islamic Republic closer than ever to weapons-grade material.
The
acknowledgement by a news website linked to the highest reaches of Iran's
theocracy renews pressure on the West to address Tehran's program, which had
been contained by the 2015 nuclear deal that America unilaterally withdrew from
in 2018. Years of attacks across the Middle East have followed.
Already
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who recently regained his country's
premiership, is threatening to take military action similar to when Israel
previously bombed nuclear programs in Iraq and Syria. But while those attacks
saw no war erupt, Iran has an arsenal of ballistic missiles, drones and other
weaponry it and its allies already have used in the region.
The
acknowledgment Thursday came from Iran's Nour News, a website linked to Iran's
Supreme National Security Council, overseen by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei. Nour News separately is sanctioned by Canada for having “participated
in gross and systematic human rights violations and perpetuated disinformation
activities to justify the Iranian regime’s repression and persecution of its
citizens" amid nationwide protests there.
The
comments by Nour News follow days of muddled comments by Iran not directly
acknowledging the accusation by inspectors from the International Atomic Energy
Agency that Iran had enriched up to 84%.
Bloomberg
first reported Sunday that inspectors had detected uranium particles enriched
up to 84%. The IAEA, a United Nations agency based in Vienna, has not denied
the report, saying only “that the IAEA is discussing with Iran the results of
recent agency verification activities.”
In
its comments Thursday, Nour News urged the IAEA to “not fall prey to the
seduction of Western countries” and declare that Iran's nuclear program was
“completely peaceful.”
“It
will be clear soon that the IAEA surprising report of discovering 84% enriched
uranium particles in Iran’s enrichment facilities was an inspector’s error or
was a deliberate action to create political atmospheres against Iran on the eve
of the meeting of" its board, Nour News said on Twitter. The board, a
group of nations that oversees the IAEA, will meet beginning March 6 in Vienna.
The
IAEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday over Nour
News' remarks.
It
wasn't immediately clear where the 84% enrichment allegedly took place, though
the IAEA has said it found two cascades of advanced IR-6 centrifuges at Iran's
underground Fordo facility “interconnected in a way that was substantially
different from the mode of operation declared by Iran to the agency in November
last year.” Iran is known to have been enriching uranium at Fordo up to 60%
purity — at level which nonproliferation experts already say has no civilian
use for Tehran.
Iran
also enriches uranium at its Natanz nuclear site.
Weapons-grade
uranium is enriched up to 90%. While the IAEA's director-general has warned
Iran now has enough uranium to produce “several” nuclear bombs if it chooses,
it likely would take months more to build a weapon and potentially miniaturize
it to put on a missile.
The
new tensions over Iran's program also take place against the backdrop of a
shadow war between Iran and Israel that has spilled out across the wider Middle
East. Netanyahu, who long has advocated military action against Iran, mentioned
it again in a talk this week.
“How
do you stop a rogue nation from acquiring nuclear weapons?” Netanyahu
rhetorically asked. “You had one that’s called Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. It was
stopped by military force, ours. You had a second one that is called Syria that
tried to develop nuclear weapons. And it was stopped by a military action,
ours.”
He
added: “A necessary condition, and an often sufficient condition, is credible
military action. The longer you wait, the harder that becomes. We’ve waited
very long.”
Iran signs breakthrough deal to export 45,000 cars to Russia
February
23, 2023
Iran’s
second largest automaker by volume, SAIPA, is set to arrive on the Russian market
following the signing of a breakthrough agreement for the export of 45,000 of
its vehicles to Russia over the next Persian year (March 21), Tejarat Online
reported on February 22.
Iran
has been stating for months that it wants to mop up the bottom end of the
Russian car market following the exodus of European and Japanese brands from
Russia amid the economic backlash against the country in the wake of the
Ukraine invasion. However, SAIPA faces stiff competition from low-cost Chinese
imports and local carmaker AvtoVaz, the producer of Lada vehicles, who both
offer cars at the same price point. Built on the backs of localised foreign
platforms, Iranian cars have, meanwhile, never been tested in harsh Russian
winter conditions.
With
the conclusion of the export contract—drawn up in line with understandings
reached at the 2022 Moscow Automobility Exhibition as Russia and Iran boosted
political and a range of economic ties—45,000 vehicles manufactured by SAIPA
will be exported to Russia in several shipments. They will have a total value
of $450mn.
The
deal to export the models was signed with Russia’s BM Group, renowned for its
production of Russian military equipment.
Vehicles
included as part of the deal are of the Shahin, Kwik and Saina models, all
built from the same platform, derived in Iran from imported systems.
SAIPA
has enjoyed success in recent years with the creation of several models built
from the same platform, with two further models to be released including a new
small hatchback model and a crossover.
Alireza
Peyman Pak, head of Iran's Trade Development Organisation, was cited by Tejarat
Online as saying: 'The turnover of the automobile sector in Russia is more than
$20bn and we can get a good share of this market after the departure of their
main partners due to [Ukraine war] sanctions.'
Mohammad
Ali Temouri, CEO of SAIPA, said: 'Our partners in Russia are two major car
manufacturers of the country that have closed due to sanctions, and SAIPA Group
is ready to send its engineering and technical team to Russia to update their
production lines and make things possible. We'll provide car production and
supply in the Russian market.'
SAIPA
is already in a deal with AvtoVAZ for the production of the mark-I Dacia Logan.
It is being rebranded by both SAIPA and Russia for local production.
SAIPA’s
main competitor in Iran, Iranian number one automaker Iran Khodro (IKCO),
exported some of its vehicles to the Russian market between 2007 and 2009, but
things did not work out. Only a few IKCO cars remain on Russia’s roads. Some
buyers of IKCO models complained that Iranian cars could not handle cold
Russian winters. There were also objections to poor-quality parts.
IKCO
sold cars in Russia that were based on old Peugeots—for example, theSamand
model, which is essentially nothing more than a Peugeot 405 from the 1980s.
By
the end of the 2000s, the Samand was seen in Russia as outdated. The country
was busy actively developing the production of Western, Korean and Japanese
brands that offered more interesting models.
Since
then, IKCO has taken a step forward in terms of its range of cars. They include
a recently released small crossover model, the Rira, based on a Groupe Peugeot
Societe Anonyme (Groupe PSA) platform from 2017.
Biden Diplomats Trying to Block U.K. Plan to Designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guard as Terror Group
February
22, 2023
Biden
administration diplomats are trying to block a U.K. plan that would see Iran’s
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) designated as a terror group, despite
the fact that the U.S. took similar steps during the Trump administration.
The
U.S. State Department, which is currently trying to revive the defunct Iran
Nuclear deal, believes that the U.K. can play a key role as interlocutors and
fears that role would be undermined by designating the IRGC a terror group,
according to a new report from The Telegraph.
The
move would harden the U.K.’s position against Iran and deal a blow to
international talks, supported by the Biden administration, that are aimed at
reviving the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which the U.S. withdrew from under
President Trump.
Designating
the IRGC a terrorist group would make it a criminal offense to belong to the
organization, attend meetings, or otherwise encourage support of its
activities. Even displaying the organization’s logo or flag in public would be
criminalized. It is a formal legal process carried out under a U.K. law known
as the Terrorism Act 2000.
Prominent
proscribed terrorist groups in the U.K. include Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Irish
Republican Army.
The
government not only assesses a group’s terrorist activities abroad, but also
the specific threat to U.K. citizens.
In
a rare public address in November of last year, MI5 director Ken McCallum
asserted that instability in Iran has real-world consequences in the U.K.
“Iran
projects threat to the U.K. directly, through its aggressive intelligence
services. At its sharpest this includes
ambitions to kidnap or even kill British or U.K.-based individuals perceived as
enemies of the regime,” explained McCallum. “We have seen at least ten such
potential threats since January [of 2022] alone.”
U.S.
intervention is now being used from sectors of the U.K. government to undermine
the plan to proscribe the IRGC, originally proposed by the Home Office. U.K.
foreign secretary James Cleverly has questioned the move and the Foreign Office
has pointed to the IRGC’s centrality within Iran.
A
decision was expected in January, but the news that the Foreign and Home
Offices are at loggerheads clarifies the reason for the delay. The final call
now rests upon prime minister Rishi Sunak’s shoulders.
Nile
Gardiner, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at The Heritage
Foundation, condemned the implications of the news.
“This
is absolutely disgraceful. The Biden Administration is groveling to the
terrorist regime in Tehran,” Gardiner said.
No comments:
Post a Comment