March
16, 2023
By
ending the weapons sales and shipments, it could "put pressure on the
militant group to reach a deal to end the conflict."
Iran
has stopped its weapons shipments to its Houthi allies in Yemen as part of the
China-brokered deal to re-establish diplomatic ties with Saudi Arabia, The Wall
Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing US and Saudi Arabian officials.
By
ending the weapons sales and shipments, it could "put pressure on the
militant group to reach a deal to end the conflict," the WSJ said.
Saudi
Arabia intervened in Yemen in 2015 to prevent the Houthis from taking over a
swath of the country. Since then, Iran has supplied the Houthis with missile
and drone technology used to target Saudi Arabia.
Earlier
this week, the special UN envoy for Yemen, Hans Grundberg, flew to Tehran to
discuss their role in ending the conflict. The special US envoy for Yemen Tim
Lenderking met with Saudi officials in Riyadh to also make an attempt to bring
back peace talks.
The
officials said that the top priority is to extend the cease-fire in Yemen that
has been going on for almost a year. The truce initially expired in October but
the rival side has continued to honor the terms.
Seizing
weapons off the coast of Yemen
Over
the past few months, the US military has seized ships that were carrying
thousands of assault rifles, millions of ammunition, antitank missiles and
other things that they could use to make explosives that were all sent by Iran
for its Houthis allies.
Britain's
Royal Navy said it had seized Iranian weapons, including anti-tank guided
missiles, last month from a smugglers' vessel in international waters in the Gulf
of Oman.
Britain
said the vessel was detected traveling south from Iran at high speed during the
hours of darkness by an unmanned US intelligence surveillance and
reconnaissance plane and was also tracked by a British helicopter.
When
hailed by the Royal Navy, the vessel initially attempted to navigate to Iranian
territorial waters but was stopped by a team of Royal Marines.
Iran’s messaging on Saudi deal is anti-Israel strategy game – analysis
March
16, 2023
Iran's
discourse on its deal with Saudi Arabia is sending a message of major setback
for the US and Israel.
Iranian
pro-government media messaging in the wake of the Iran-Saudi deal has portrayed
the deal as a major setback for the US and Israel. This is interesting because
the pro-regime analysis at news organizations such as Tasnim News in Iran
appears to dovetail with some commentators in the West who also see the deal as
a blow to the two Western allies.
It
is clear that Iranian pro-regime media is not coming to this conclusion in
agreement with those in the West who are pro-Israel and critics of Iran but worried
about the deal’s ramifications.
Instead,
Iranian media, with support from the regime and the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps), is messaging about this deal in such a way as to portray it as
some kind of real-world chess game.
The
concept of three-dimensional chess is one in which something is overly
complicated and not played out in a linear or two-dimensional landscape. Iran’s
regime doesn’t want to send the message that the deal with Saudi Arabia was
simply due to necessity and pragmatism and that Iran is now pro-Saudi. Instead,
it wants to message that it is doing more than just normalizing ties with
Riyadh, pretending that it has done so to undermine the US and Israel.
According
to the Tasnim International News Agency report, “the developments in the region
in the recent stage have moved in different directions, which shows that the period
of maneuvers and benefits of the US and the Zionist regime – from the tension
in the relations of the countries of the region to stabilize the existence of
Israel and create a Zionist-Arab coalition against Iran and the axis of
resistance – is over.” This convoluted statement means that the new Saudi-Iran
deal is part of a larger process by which Tehran and its “resistance” allies in
the region are reversing several years of Israeli success that came about via
the Abraham Accords.
The
Abraham Accords concerned Iran
IRAN
WAS very worried by the Abraham Accords. It was wary of Israel’s ties with
Bahrain and the UAE and potential ties with Saudi Arabia. Iranian media often
tried to undermine the Gulf States that were working with the Jewish state.
Iran also mobilized groups like the Houthis to threaten Saudi Arabia and the
Emirates. The Houthis in Yemen are also anti-American and anti-Israel.
Iran’s
pro-regime media had several articles this week describing the Iran-Saudi deal
as a blow to the US in the region. The recent report says that this is “the
beginning of the decline of American influence in the region.” This narrative
is interesting because even though the Islamic Republic’s media says the
agreement is important and changes seven years of tensions between Iran and
Saudi, the claims also portray this as part of the process of US withdrawal
from Afghanistan and also say that the US has failed in Syria and Ukraine.
Why
does Iran’s regime think it also has to portray the deal as a setback for
Israel? Iran is spreading this message because of this “3-D chess” game, where
it wants to pretend it did one thing – signing a deal with Riyadh – in order to
achieve something else: the erosion of Israeli influence in the Gulf.
There’s
no evidence that the deal with Saudi Arabia is a setback for Israel, however.
Iran wants to spread this message precisely because this is not actually an
aspect of the deal. The Saudi-Iran deal reported elsewhere in the region, such
as Turkey, is seen as pragmatic and will include potential trade and
investment. This is a “constructive” deal, according to an article at Turkey’s
Anadolu.
Iran’s
messaging is different. It wants to claim the deal is actually related to the
US and Israel. Tehran has been claiming to “resist” them for decades.
This
is part of its general propaganda in the region. It mobilizes Hezbollah,
militias in Syria and Iraq, and the Houthis in Yemen under the banner of
fighting Israel and the US. But this “axis of resistance” is largely a
propaganda story. Iran uses claims of opposing these two Western powers as a
way to get its foot in the door in places like Lebanon, Syria and Iraq.
It
then exploits local conditions to get a stranglehold on the economy and
politics, and to hollow out the state and profit off the decline of these
countries. While it puts up a banner of “opposing the US,” overall everyone who
has watched Lebanon over the last decade and a half should notice that the
“resistance” has bankrupted Lebanon, but hasn’t opposed the US or Israel any
more than it used to. This shows that Iran’s messaging is largely used to
sugar-coat reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment