May
8, 2023
On
March 20, Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Russian President Vladimir
Putin in Moscow. In his article in the Russian media preceding the meeting, XI
enthused that "China-Russia trade exceeded 190 billion U.S. dollars last
year, up by 116 percent from ten years ago." Though it has reached 190
billion US dollars, it is no longer all being traded in US dollars. In his
article in the Chinese media, Putin said that "the share of settlements in
national currencies" of all that trade "is growing." 65% of that
massive China-Russia trade is now being conducting in their Russian and Chinese
currencies.
Though
the US sees Russia and China as the largest threats to its position in the
world, it is not just America’s enemies that are fleeing the dollar. Its
closest friends have hinted at it too. Following his meetings with XI in China,
French President Emmanuel Macron likely stunned and angered the US by calling
for Europe to reduce its dependency on the "extraterritoriality of the US
dollar."
These
calls for a flight from the US dollar are not merely economic, they are
geopolitical. They are calls to reshape the world order by challenging US
hegemony and advocating multipolarity. The monopoly of the dollar has not just
assured US wealth: it has assured US power. Most international trade is
conducted in dollars, and most foreign exchange reserves are held in dollars.
That dollar dominance has often allowed the US to dictate ideological alignment
or to impose economic and political structural adjustments on other countries.
It has also allowed the US to become the only country in the world that can
effectively sanction its opponents. Emancipation from the hegemony of the
dollar is emancipation from US hegemony. The flight from the US dollar is a
mechanism for replacing the US led unipolar world with a multipolar world.
As
the US has recently demonstrated in Cuba, Venezuela, Afghanistan, Iran and
Russia, the monopoly of the dollar allows it to be very powerfully and quickly
weaponized. Countries’ funds can be held hostage, and countries can be coerced
and starved into falling in line by sanctions. Recent demonstrations of that
power have awoken many countries to their own vulnerability.
US
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen recently said that "There is a risk when
we use financial sanctions that are linked to the role of the dollar that over
time it could undermine the hegemony of the dollar.” She explained that “Of
course, it does create a desire on the part of China, of Russia, of Iran to
find an alternative.”
And
that’s just what it’s done. But Yellen is still missing the larger effect of US
dollar warfare. It is not just China, Russia and Iran that are now seeking to
escape the pressure. America’s enemies, but also its friends and everything in
between, are considering taking flight from the dollar.
China
and Russia are doing it. NATO ally France is calling for it for Europe.
Nonaligned countries are also either talking about it or already doing it.
India
is a growing economic power. And, like China, India has massively increased its
trade with Russia. India and Russia have now begun discussions on a free trade
agreement between India and the Russian led Eurasian Economic Commission. The
two countries are now engaged in “advanced negotiations” for a new bilateral
investment treaty. Russia has expressed interest in using “national currencies
and currencies of friendly countries” for trade. India, too, “has been keen
on" moving toward leaving the dollar behind by "increasing the use of
its rupee currency for trade with Russia.” And India has recently begun
purchasing some Russian oil in Russian rubles.
US
dollar hegemony has also been threatened right in America’s backyard. Brazilian
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has proposed escaping dollar control by
"creat[ing] a Latin American currency." While in China for meetings
with XI, Lula asked, “Who decided the dollar would be the [world’s] currency?”
He then answered his own question. In March, Brazil and China escaped the US
dollar by each assigning one of its banks to conduct their bilateral trade in the
Brazilian real and the Chinese yuan.
Pakistan
is now also trading with China in its own currency. Iran and Russia have taken
flight from the dollar and are now settling trade in rials and rubles. They
recently announced that they have circumvented the US financial system by
linking their banking systems as an alternative to SWIFT for trading with each
other. Saudi Arabia has said that it sees “no issues” in trading oil in
currencies other than the US dollar. Robert Rabil, Professor of political science
at Florida Atlantic University, says that the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and
Israel have all made some movement away from the US dollar.
The
Eurasian Economic Union has agreed on "a phased transition" from
settling trade in "foreign currency" to "settlements in
rubles."
Perhaps
more surprisingly for the US was the decision at the March 30-31 meeting of the
finance ministers and central bank governors of the Association of Southeast
Asian Nations (ASEAN) to reduce reliance on the US dollar. ASEAN is made up of
Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos,
Malaysia, Myanmar and Brunei. The meeting produced a joint statement to
"reinforce financial resilience . . . through the use of local
currency." But what must have been most unsettling for the US was the
explanation given for the decision by Indonesian President Joko Widodo. Widodo
said that the move is necessary to protect from "possible geopolitical
repercussions." What did he mean by that? "Be very careful," he
explained. "We must remember the sanctions imposed by the US on
Russia."
Yellen
was right. Widodo said that US sanctions on Russia exposed just how vulnerable
countries are if they rely on US dollars and US foreign payment systems. He
said that using ASEAN’s Local Currency Transaction system to trade in local
currencies would help address the need for Indonesia to prepare itself for the
possibility that the US could similarly sanction it.
The
EEU and ASEAN are not the only organizations mapping their flight from the US
dollar. BRICS is a massive international organization whose primary purpose is
to balance US hegemony in a new multipolar world. Comprised of Brazil, Russia,
India, China and South Africa, it represents 41% of the world’s population.
BRICS, too, is talking about conducting trade in the currencies of its members
or even in a new BRICS’ currency.
Lula
recently suggested that “the BRICS bank have a currency to finance trade
between Brazil and China, between Brazil and other BRICS countries” so that
countries are not compelled “to chase after dollars to export, when they could
be exporting in their own currencies.” Russian State Duma Deputy Chairman
Alexander Babakov also recently said that BRICS is working on creating its own
currency.
A
BRICS currency could challenge the dollar beyond the borders of BRICS.
"Because each member of the BRICS grouping is an economic heavyweight in
its own region, countries around the world would likely be willing to do
business" in the currency, suggested a report in the Financial Post.
One
such region is Africa. In July, the Russia-Africa summit will be held in St.
Petersburg. Olayinka Ajala, senior lecturer in Politics and International
Relations at Leeds Beckett University and the author of "The Case for
Neutrality: Understanding African Stances on the Russia-Ukraine Conflict,"
told me in a recent correspondence that a "main focus of Russia and China
at the moment is to get African countries to support the proposed BRICS
currency." He says that "this will be a major topic in the upcoming
conference." Ajala explains that "Africa is a consuming continent,
meaning they import lots of goods and services." He says that "with a
population of over 1.2 billion, if Russia and China are able to convince
African countries on the need to ditch the dollar, it will be a huge blow to
the US."
From
Africa to Southeast Asia and Latin America, from Russia and China to India,
Iran and Saudi Arabia, countries are mapping their course for a flight from the
US dollar. As a mechanism for transition from US hegemony to a multipolar
world, the economic effects would be great, but the geopolitical effects could
be even greater.
No comments:
Post a Comment