June 24, 2024
As uncomfortable
as it may be to many, Israel’s current apartheid policies took shape in the
lead up to the Holocaust when Nazi Germany and a small group of influential
Zionists formed an alliance to build their ethno-nationalist states.
On Aug. 25,
1933, German Zionists signed an agreement with the Nazi government that allowed
some wealthy German Jews to immigrate to Palestine in exchange for purchasing
German goods that were then exported to the Jewish community in Palestine.
As part of the
deal, the Zionists also agreed to lobby the global Jewish community to end
their boycott of German goods that began when Hitler came to power.
A 1933 memo from
the Zionist Federation of Germany to the Nazi party promised:
“should the Germans accept the cooperation of the
Zionists, these (sic) would try to dissuade Jews abroad from supporting the
anti-German boycott.”
The so-called
Transfer or Haavara Agreement (named for the Tel Aviv company where the funds
were transferred) was endorsed by top Nazi officials including Adolph Eichmann
and Hitler and future Israeli prime ministers David Ben Gurion, Moshe Shertok
and Golda Meir.
For the
Zionists, the deal allowed affluent German Jews to keep some of their capital
and resettle in Palestine. For the Nazis, the agreement not only helped rid
Germany of a small portion of its Jewish population (60,000 between 1933-1939)
but, critically, it doomed the boycott movement to failure and opened up the
global export market for German goods to boost its economy.
The cover of a
matchbook distributed by the Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi League to champion the
anti-Nazi boycott of 1933. (Ephemeral New York, Wikimedia Commons, Public
domain)
For the majority
of mostly non- and anti-Zionist Jews around the world, it was a betrayal that
deprived them of one of the few weapons they had to fight the Nazis.
It was
symbolised by the freakish image of the Haavara transport ship, the Tel Aviv,
with its name inscribed in Hebrew on the bow, and the Swastika flag hoisted on
deck.
In the decades
before the agreement, Zionists’ efforts to build a Jewish state in Palestine
had been slow. Even after the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which promised a Jewish
homeland in Palestine, British authorities limited Jewish immigration and Jews
found it difficult to acquire enough land to displace the indigenous Arab
population. By 1920, Jews had only been able to purchase less than 2 percent of
Palestinian land.
For the
Zionists, Hitler’s ascendance presented a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to
supercharge immigration to Palestine: Israel’s future leader, David Ben Gurion,
said “what Zionist propaganda for years could not do, disaster has done
overnight.”
And according to
German-Jewish journalist and historian Hannah Arendt,
“anti-Semitism was an overwhelming
force, and the Jews would either have to make use of it or be swallowed up by
it. In expert hands [such as David Ben-Gurion & Co.] this ‘propelling
force’…would be used in the same way that boiling water is used to produce
steam power.”
Who Should Be
Saved
What was left
out of the Zionist project, however, was the fate of the vast majority of
European Jews who were being marginalized, attacked and murdered.
In his history
of the British Mandate, One Palestine Complete, Israeli journalist Tom Segey
wrote that “saving European Jews did not figure at the head of the priorities
of the [Zionist] ruling class.” Rather, “the foundation of the State was
primordial in their eyes.”
At a Zionist
Labor Party conference in 1938, Ben Gurion laid out his formula for who should
be saved after Britain’s offer to rescue thousands of Jewish children from
Europe:
“If I knew it was possible to save all
the children in Germany by taking them to England, and only half of the
children by taking them to Eretz Israel, I would choose the second solution.
For we must take into account not only the lives of these children but the
historic interest of the people of Israel.”
However, it
wasn’t just any children the Zionists wanted in Palestine, such as the majority
from the impoverished shtetls of Eastern Europe and Russia.
“We want only
the best of Jewish youth to come to us…only the educated to enter,” declared
Israel’s future president Chaim Weizmann at the 1937 World Zionist Conference
in Zurich, Switzerland,
“the other Jews will have to stay where
they are and face whatever fate awaits them. These millions of Jews are dust on
the wheels of history and they may have to be blown away. We don’t want them
pouring into Palestine. We don’t want Tel Aviv to become another low-grade
ghetto.”
Indeed, the
Zionists and Nazis were kindred spirits: both were building ethno-nationalist
states premised on racial purity — a concept increasingly espoused at the time
— and both vehemently opposed the assimilation of Jews in Europe.
“The attitude of
the Zionists towards the encroaching menace of fascist domination in Germany
was determined by some common ideological assumptions:” writes German
journalist Klaus Polkhen in The Secret Contacts:
“The fascists as well as the Zionists
believed in unscientific racial theories, and both met on the same ground in
their beliefs in such mystical generalizations as ‘national character
(Volkstum)…and ‘racial exclusiveness.’”
Seeing
Eye-to-Eye With Fascists
A memo to the
Nazi party from the Zionist Federation of Germany on June 21, 1933, assured the
fascists that they saw eye to eye:
“Our recognition of the Jewish
nationality allows us to establish clear and sincere relations with the German
people and its national and racial realities…because we too are against mixed
marriages and for the maintaining of the purity of the Jewish group.”
Athur Ruppin, a
sociologist who headed the Palestine Zionist Executive, drew directly on Nazi
master race theories.
He believed that
Zionism required “racial purity” and that “only the racially pure come to the
land.” Inspired by the work of Nazi scientists, he performed skull measurements
to demonstrate that Ashkenazi Jews were superior to Yemeni Jews and argued against
immigration of Ethiopian Jews because of their lack of “blood connection.”
In fact, some
Zionists were elated by Nazi anti-Semitism. At a 1937 Berlin meeting with Adolf
Eichmann, Feivel Polkes, a member of the Zionist underground army, commended
the terror in Germany:
“Nationalist Jewish circles expressed
their great joy over the radical German policy towards the Jews, as this policy
would increase the Jewish population in Palestine so that one can reckon with a
Jewish majority in Palestine over the Arabs.”
Polkes’s
admiration was reciprocated by Eichmann, who claimed, “had I been a Jew, I
would have been a fanatical Zionist. In fact, I would have been the most ardent
Zionist there was.”
Given their
similar views on race and nation-building, the Nazis gave the Zionists
preferential treatment in almost every sphere.
They were the only non-Nazi group allowed to wear their own uniforms,
fly their own flag and espouse a separate political philosophy up to 1939.
While the German
Ministry of Propaganda banned all newspapers published by the Communists,
Social Democrats, trade unions and other progressive organizations, the Zionist
paper, the Judische Rundschau, was allowed to publish its propaganda unhindered
from 1933 to 1939.
Unlike the
German Zionists, most Jews in Europe were resisting the fascists — fighting
them in Spain — where 30 percent of the American Lincoln Brigade were Jews —
and in Poland, where half of the 5,000 Dombrovski brigade fighters were Jewish,
smuggling arms to Eastern European ghettos and pushing for other countries to
come to their rescue.
At the same
time, Zionists were doing everything possible to scuttle these efforts.
In 1938, when a
global conference of 32 countries convened in Evian-les-Baines, France, to
address the issue of German and Austrian Jews fleeing Nazi persecution, only
the Dominican Republic came to their rescue, offering up to 100,000 Jewish
refugees “vacant areas of fertile land, excellent roads, and a police force
that maintains law and order.”
Despite the
generous offer, “the Zionists’ hostility was naked and uncompromising,” wrote
Holocaust researcher S. B. Beit Zvi.
“Zionists were resistant to anything
liable to jeopardize their fundraising revenues …. If the Jews of America
contributed to the colony in the Dominican Republic, they might give less to
the Jewish National Fund or the Keren Hayesod [United Israel Appeal].”
Similarly,
Zionists were hostile to various other proposals and offers to resettle Jews in
Australia, the Soviet Union, Japan, Madagascar and Alaska.
“Focusing on
Palestine as the ONLY legitimate destination for large-scale emigration, the
World Zionist Organization rejected opportunities from 1933 onwards to resettle
German Jews in havens or homes other than Eretz Yisrael,” wrote American
historian Edwin Black: “The Zionist stance made it clear: Palestine or
nothing.”
Even by 1943
when the Holocaust was well underway, Zionists continued to block Jews who
tried to settle outside of Palestine.
When a large
group of American orthodox rabbis marched in Washington, D.C., asking President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt to rescue Europe’s Jews, Zionist leaders dissuaded
the president from meeting with them.
Playing to
American anti-Semitism, the head of the World Jewish Congress, Rabbi Stephen
Wise, and Samuel Rosenman, from the American Jewish Committee, told Roosevelt
that the protesting rabbis were first-generation immigrants who were “not
representative of American Jewry” and not the kind of Jews with whom Roosevelt
should meet. Indeed, when they arrived at the White House, they were told
(untruthfully) that Roosevelt was not available.
Later in
1941, when the U.S. Congress finally
proposed forming a rescue commission, Rabbi Wise came to Washington to testify
against the bill because it did not mention Palestine.
The Kastner
Train
Perhaps no other
incident exemplified the Zionist betrayal more than the saga of the Kastner
Train, which involved collaborating with Nazis over the fate of Hungarian Jews.
In April 1944,
at the height of the exterminations, Adolf Eichmann offered a deal to Joel
Brand, the head of the Hungarian Aid and Rescue Committee: the Nazis would
spare the lives of one million Hungarian Jews in exchange for 10,000 trucks and
other goods from the Allies.
Brand
immediately flew to Istanbul to present the proposal to the Jewish Agency
which, as Brand later said, lacked any sense of urgency, since it was more
focused on Jewish emigration to Palestine than the slaughter in Europe.
Back in
Budapest, Eichmann proposed another deal to Zionist leader Rudolph Kastner,
Brand’s colleague from the Committee: in exchange for $1,000 each ($25,000 in
today’s currency) Eichmann would allow the departure of 1,684 mostly affluent
Jews, including Kastner’s family and friends, to escape to Switzerland by
train. As part of the arrangement,
Kastner agreed to not inform Hungarian Jews that they were being sent to their
deaths in the crematoriums.
Between May and
July 1944, 437,000 Jews — almost the entire rural Jewish population of Hungary
were deported to Auschwitz, where most were gassed on arrival.
In 1954, an
Israeli judge ruled that Kastner had “sold his soul to the devil” by
negotiating with Eichmann to save some Jews, while “paving the way for the
murder of Hungarian Jewry.” He was
assassinated on 15 March, 1957. by members of the Lehi, Israel’s right-wing
militia, for collaborating with Nazis. Kastner was later rehabilitated as a
hero in Israel.
Many still
maintain that the Haavara Agreement and Kastner’s deal with Eichmann were
pragmatic decisions to save the lives of thousands of Jews and help build a
Jewish homeland. But, as American
journalist Lenni Brenner wrote about Haavara,
“All excuses that it saved lives must be
strictly excluded from serious consideration…it saved wealth, not lives… or,
more properly, a piece of the property of the German Jewish bourgeoisie”
In the end,
collaboration with the Nazis by a small group of Zionists broke the global
boycott against Germany, weakened anti-fascist resistance worldwide, and
contributed to the genocide of Europe’s Jews.
Indeed, the
Zionists-Nazi Alliance became part of the ideological foundation of Israel’s
apartheid and genocidal policies today.
No comments:
Post a Comment