June 10, 2024
The United States has for nearly 80 years seen
Ukraine as the staging ground for its once covert and increasingly overt war
with Russia.
C.I.A.’s Allen
Dulles asks U.S. Immigration to allow Lebed re-entry to U.S. despite murder
conviction. (From Hitler’s Shadow)
After years of warnings, and after talk since 2008
of Ukraine joining NATO, Russia fought back two years ago. With neither side
backing down Ukraine is increasingly becoming a flashpoint that could lead to
nuclear war.
The West thinks Russia is bluffing. But its doctrine
states that if Russia feels that its existence is threatened it could resort to
nuclear arms. Instead of taking these warnings seriously, NATO is recklessly
opening corridors for a ground war against Russia in Ukraine; France says it’s
putting together a coalition of nations to enter the war, despite Russia saying
French or any other NATO force would be fair game.
In Paris the other day Joe Biden said Russia wants
to conquer all of Europe but can’t even take Khariv. It is this kind of
inflammatory nonsense, combined with allowing Ukraine to fire NATO weapons into
Russian territory, that is imperiling us all.
The danger started building up many years ago but it
is now reading a head.
The U.S. relationship with Ukraine, and its
extremists, to undermine Russia began after the Second World War. During the
war, units of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) took part in
the Holocaust, killing at least 100,000 Jews and Poles.
Mykola Lebed, a top aide to Stepan Bandera, the
leader of the fascist OUN-B, was recruited by the C.I.A. after the war,
according to a 2010 study by the U.S. National Archives.
Lebed was the “foreign minister” of a Banderite
government in exile, but he later broke with Bandera for acting as a dictator.
The U.S. Army Counterintelligence Corps termed Bandera “extremely dangerous”
yet said he was “looked upon as the spiritual and national hero of all
Ukrainians….”
Instead of Bandera, the C.I.A. was interested in
Lebed, despite his fascist background. They set him up in an office in New York
City from which he directed sabotage and propaganda operations on the agency’s
behalf inside Ukraine against the Soviet Union.
The U.S. government study says:
“CIA operations with these Ukrainians
began in 1948 under the cryptonym CARTEL, soon changed to AERODYNAMIC. … Lebed
relocated to New York and acquired permanent resident status, then U.S.
citizenship. It kept him safe from assassination, allowed him to speak to
Ukrainian émigré groups, and permitted him to return to the United States after
operational trips to Europe. Once in the United States, Lebed was the CIA’s
chief contact for AERODYNAMIC. CIA handlers pointed to his ‘cunning character,’
his ‘relations with the Gestapo and … Gestapo training,’ [and] the fact that he
was ‘a very ruthless operator.’”
The C.I.A. worked with Lebed on sabotage and
pro-Ukrainian nationalist propaganda operations inside Ukraine until Ukraine’s
independence in 1991.
“Mykola Lebed’s relationship with the CIA lasted the
entire length of the Cold War,” the study says. “While most CIA operations
involving wartime perpetrators backfired, Lebed’s operations augmented the
fundamental instability of the Soviet Union.”
Continued Until and Beyond Ukrainian
Independence
The U.S. thus covertly kept Ukrainian fascist ideas
alive inside Ukraine until at least Ukrainian independence was achieved.
“Mykola Lebed, Bandera’s wartime chief in Ukraine, died in 1998. He is buried
in New Jersey, and his papers are located at the Ukrainian Research Institute
at Harvard University,” the U.S. National Archives study says.
The successor organization to the OUN-B in the
United States did not die with him, however.
It had been renamed the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA),
according to IBT.
“By the mid-1980s, the Reagan administration was
honeycombed with UCCA members. Reagan personally welcomed [Yaroslav] Stetsko,
the Banderist leader who oversaw the massacre of 7,000 Jews in Lviv, in the
White House in 1983,” IBT reported.
“Following the demise of [Viktor] Yanukovich’s regime [in 2014], the
UCCA helped organise rallies in cities across the US in support of the
EuroMaidan protests,” it reported.
That is a direct link between the U.S.-backed 2014
Maidan coup against a democratically-elected Ukrainian government and WWII-era
Ukrainian fascism.
Since 2014, the U.S. pushed for an attack on Russian
speakers in eastern Ukraine who had rejected the coup, and NATO began training
and equipping Ukrainian troops. Combined
with talk since 2008 of Ukraine joining NATO, Russia into act on years of
warning.
More than two years later, with Ukraine clearly
losing the war, Western leaders will do just about anything to save their
political skins as they have staked so much on winning in Ukraine. Don’t listen to them. They need a West in denial of the dangers
facing us.
As President John F. Kennedy said in his 1963
American University speech:
“Above all, while defending our own
vital interests, nuclear powers must avert those confrontations which bring an
adversary to a choice of either a humiliating retreat or a nuclear war. To
adopt that kind of course in the nuclear age would be evidence only of the
bankruptcy of our policy–or of a collective death-wish for the world.”
The world may wake up when it’s too late — after the
missiles have already started flying.
In Hong Kong, the 1987 Joint
Declaration states clearly that matters of national defence will be in the
hands of the Mainland, while local police and administrative matters will
belong to the SAR. China has 100% complied with the Joint Declaration but the
UK has not. If you don’t believe me, read the declaration, you might not like
it but you’ll find this is correct.
Related to Taiwan, there are three
joint communiques where presidents of the United States have agreed to pull all
military out of Taiwan 1972 Nixon said it, in 1979 it was Carter who agreed and
in 1982 it was something Reagan promised to do too. Albeit that U.S. historians
now argue there was no date given, there were and always were clear indications
that arms would be reduced and troops would be removed.
Therefore, there can be no mistake,
U.S. troops in Taiwan now are an invading force, by placing them there, the
U.S. might have complied with its own “Taiwan Relations Act” but it is in
breach of the UN Charter, UN Resolutions and has broken promises made by three
of its own presidents.
Let’s move to Xinjiang for
a moment
The United Nations have visited
Xinjiang, this was just last month and is another thing mainstream media forgot
to tell us about; conveniently so because they not only found there are no
human rights abuses by China, but there are human rights abuses by the USA with
illegal and arbitrary sanctions which take away the ability to find well-paid
work from locals.
They also found that the USA had
removed the presumption of innocence and therefore due process from China—one
company provided 10,000 pages of information including independent assessments
of its human resource policies and the U.S. said it wasn’t enough.
Media didn’t tell us this because
everything positive coming out of Xinjiang must be reported negatively; if
there might be something positive about it, it’s completely ignored, as Dr
Alana Douhan’s visit has been.
Rather than tell us something positive
they lie by omission; they won’t tell us what they don’t want us to hear.
What they’re not telling us about Hong
Kong is even more incredible. In Hong Kong several people have recently been in
court, not as western media says, for having democratic viewpoints but for
preparing petrol bombs, planning mass murder and undermining the entire
democratic system that already exist there—western media have not reported any
of this. Can you believe that there was a plot which included international
funding, two bombs, and a sniper to kill police officers? Some of the
terrorists even went to Taiwan for training by persons unknown and they hatched
a plan to kill as many police officers as possible. Most people outside of Hong
Kong and China aren’t aware of this but I assure you it’s true. It’s all come
out in open court with journalist present but not telling us about it. Many of
the people involved pleaded guilty, some turned evidence on their
co-conspirators.
This is not China persecuting innocent
democracy protestors.
When Western media tells you that
people are being convicted for having a democratic outlook, what they’re
leaving out is that their form of democracy meant murder and mayhem leading to
the collapse of the economy, society and a complete failure of governance. The
kinds of things that would get a death sentence in many countries are being
dealt with in Hong Kong Courts right now—this isn’t democracy under trial, this
is internationally organised and funded terrorism.
Dr Tim Summers, is a professor at the
University of Hong Kong and he’s spent a long time looking at thousands of
articles from British media between 2020 and 2023 he found
“that a clear majority of
the articles about China across different media outlets adopt a negative tone
or frame China negatively for British readers. That majority is of the order of
magnitude of two-thirds, probably higher rather than lower. Further, very few
articles frame China positively.”
What this means is that not only are
they not reporting the positive news, they are reporting anything positive with
a negative slant—I’m certain we didn’t need a university study to realise this
but it’s nice to have the facts proven in a way that is accountable,
transparent and with a methodology that is acceptable to all academics
everywhere which proves there is a relentless bias against China.
It isn’t that China is all bad—ask 1.4
billion people and they will tell you it isn’t, it’s that Western media
paymasters want their audience to think that it is—similar studies were done on
media in the lead up to the Iraq War, and look where that lead us.
We can be assured there were similar
negatively biased media reports on Russia, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea and
anywhere else the U.S. government wants us to believe there is a rogue
government. But look carefully, as critical readers should. Look carefully as
academics like Dr Tim Summers and many others have done, and you’ll see. These
aren’t ‘rogue nations’ except in the mind of Western Media.
China is a country that has lifted
millions out of poverty, it’s done nothing but call for peace, cooperation and
a greater voice for the under-developed world. China most certainly hasn’t
invaded, threatened to invade or even postulated that it might invade, it has
clearly stated it will defend a recognised part of its territory, Taiwan, from
being taken away by outside influences, as happened just 150 years ago. China
simply exists as a country with an ideology that has proven to work for its 1.4
billion people, an ideology that some countries in the world don’t like.
Consequently, we’re being fed a litany
of lies about China, about their intentions and their policies. If we had any
neutral mainstream media we’d know of things like the HK terrorist plot. We’d
know about the Joint Declaration, the Joint Communiques on Taiwan. We’d learn
the reality of Xinjiang, and we’d have both sides of every China story to make
our own judgements. As it is, with only the negative half of the story, much of
the Western world believes that China is a threat to them.
They are not; the real threat comes
from the people telling us China is a threat.
No comments:
Post a Comment