August 7, 2024
During a White
House press conference on 31 July, National Security Council spokesman John
Kirby underscored the US commitment to maintaining readiness to protect its
security interests in West Asia.
We have and will maintain a level of
readiness to preserve our national security interests in the region. It’s not
like we take a blind eye to what Iran is capable of doing and has shown their
capability of doing in the region.
His comments
came amid spiked regional tensions, the highest since 7 October. Protecting
Washington’s interests in the Levant and the Persian Gulf is a top priority for
the Biden administration, especially given Tel Aviv’s dangerous recent
provocations, including attacks and assassinations in Beirut, Tehran, and
Hodeidah – inside key countries within the Axis of Resistance, which could
escalate into a major conflict threatening US interests.
US
militarization in West Asia
Nearly a month
after the Gaza war began, the Pentagon outlined its primary goals in West Asia.
These include protecting US forces and citizens, ensuring the continuous flow
of critical security assistance to the occupation state, coordinating with
occupation authorities to secure the release of prisoners held by Hamas,
including American citizens, and bolstering the US military presence to deter
any state or non-state actors from escalating the crisis further. Clearly,
Washington’s focus extends well beyond Gaza.
As of last
October, when the Gaza war erupted following Hamas’ Operation Al-Aqsa Flood,
over 45,000 US troops were stationed in West Asia, spread across US military
bases in about 12 countries. This number does not include the naval fleets
permanently stationed in the region’s many waterways.
US military presence in West Asia
Additionally,
the US intermittently deploys thousands of troops to respond to crises and
rising tensions, as evidenced by the relocation of nearly 1,200 service members
and thousands more aboard the Navy aircraft carrier and the deployment of the
nearly 2,000-strong Marine expeditionary unit following the war on Gaza’s
onset.
In response to
the escalating situation, particularly after Israel’s targeted assassinations
of senior Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr and Hamas politburo chief Ismail
Haniyeh in Beirut and Tehran, respectively, the US Department of Defense
announced strategic adjustments to its military posture in the region.
These
adjustments have two main goals: enhance the protection of US forces and
support Israel’s defense. To maintain a robust presence, Secretary of Defense
Lloyd Austin ordered the USS Abraham Lincoln strike carrier group to replace
the USS Theodore Roosevelt in the Pentagon’s Central Command area of
responsibility.
He also deployed
additional cruisers and destroyers capable of defending against ballistic
missiles to the US European Command and US Central Command regions.
Furthermore, the Pentagon is increasing its readiness to deploy additional
land-based ballistic missile defenses and has ordered the deployment of an
extra fighter squadron to West Asia.
These
adjustments augment the extensive capabilities the US military already
maintains in the region, including the USS Wasp Ready Amphibious Group/Marine
Expeditionary Unit operating in the Eastern Mediterranean.
US economic
imperium in West Asia
In addition to
the significant US military build-up in West Asia, US civilian companies also
play a major role in the region, primarily in critical sectors involving oil
and gas, technology, and telecommunications.
Foreign direct
investment (FDI) into West Asia saw remarkable growth in 2023, with companies
announcing 1,848 projects worth an estimated $88.3 billion. As a result, West
Asia ranked as the fourth most attractive region for FDI in 2024 in terms of
investor interest.
The US was the
leading source of FDI into West Asia in 2023, with US firms announcing 362
projects valued at $36 billion. This represented a notable increase in capital
investment, with more than double the figures from the previous year.
These companies
are heavily concentrated in the Persian Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia,
the UAE, Qatar, and Oman – as well as Israel. The occupation state is a
particularly accessible destination for US investment in the region, with US
FDI (equities) into Israel alone reaching $42.5 billion in 2022. This
investment is focused mainly on manufacturing, information services, and
professional, scientific, and technical services.
Closure of the
Strait of Hormuz
The possibility
of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway at the mouth of the
Persian Gulf, is a recurring concern whenever tensions with the Islamic
Republic rise. This strait is a crucial shipping route, handling nearly 30
percent of the world’s oil trade.
It connects the
Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, from Iran to the north, and the UAE and Oman
to the south. The danger of this corridor during times of tension lies in its
shallow depth, which leaves passing ships vulnerable to mines. Its proximity to
the Iranian mainland also makes ships susceptible to attacks by coastal
missiles or interception by patrol boats and helicopters.
The closure of
the strait would have immediate effects on global energy prices. In the first
quarter of 2024, tankers shipped nearly 15.5 million barrels per day of crude
and condensate from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, the UAE, and Iran through the
strait. The strait is also a critical liquefied natural gas (LNG) corridor,
with more than a fifth of the world’s supply, mostly from Qatar, passing
through during the same period.
Americans will
pay the price
As noted
previously by The Cradle, a World Bank study indicated that any tension in the
region would directly impact energy prices, with the rate of increase varying
according to the level of tension. This issue is particularly significant now,
as US polls show that most voters prioritize the domestic economy.
For instance, a
February Pew survey found that 73 percent of voters consider strengthening the
economy a top priority. Consequently, Iran has the potential to influence
American voter sentiment indirectly by affecting energy prices through actions
involving the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
The likelihood
of a regional war is becoming increasingly tangible due to Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s persistent aggressive policies in Gaza and the
broader region. This potential multi-front conflict could reach unprecedented
levels, especially considering Iran’s perception that its very existence as an
Islamic Republic is at stake.
In such a
scenario, Tehran and other members of the Resistance Axis would likely deploy
all available resources and strategies to defend their collective interests.
And if US military forces or facilities become directly engaged, US interests –
both military and economic – will be at the heart of the confrontation.
Deploying more
US troops and assets into the region at such a critical juncture only broadens
American target banks for the Axis.
No comments:
Post a Comment