August 29, 2024
Russia in Global
Affairs ) – Modern Israel attracts much attention from analysts and the public
but our ability to understand it is hindered by ideology, prejudice, and myth.
Many tread carefully when discussing Israel lest they be accused of antisemitism.
In an earlier article, I explained what distinguishes anti-Zionism from
antisemitism. However, the fundamental difficulty lies in the habitual
association of the state in Western Asia with the Jews. Should we view those
who inhabit and govern Israel as Jews or have they become something else —
namely, Israelis?
The “nature
versus nurture” debate over the relative influence of inherited traits versus
environmental conditions on humans is older than many realize. It can be traced
through different stages of the biblical narrative. Angry at the Israelites’
worship of the golden calf, God was ready to destroy them all and start anew
with Moses. Nature was to blame, as God despaired that these “stiff-necked
people” could be re-educated.
In another
biblical story, however, the Israelites were sent to wander in the wilderness
for forty years to be reformatted before being allowed to enter the Land of
Canaan. In this case, the emphasis was on nurture over nature, with the hope
that the experience of benefiting from boundless generosity—such as the manna
and the protective clouds of glory—would change them. This may have been the
first known attempt at social engineering, even though the success was only
variable.
The contemporary
history of the Jews presents a more daring case of such re-education. For
centuries, Jewish ideals have stressed mercy, modesty, and beneficence. The
abhorrence of violence is so ingrained that in many Jewish communities, knives,
which could be tools of murder, must be removed from the table before reciting
the grace after a meal. Blessing and violence are deemed incompatible.
After centuries
of being educated to strive for moral perfection, some Jews — initially a tiny
minority — adopted a unusual role as colonial settlers—a role historically
associated with European Christian civilization.
Mostly atheists
and agnostics, Zionist pioneers in Palestine concluded that “God does not
exist, but He promised us this land.”
They
conveniently instrumentalized biblical commandments, such as “You shall clear out the Land and settle in
it, for I have given you the Land to occupy it.” The settlers embraced a
literal and materialistic reading of the Bible abandoning the interpretative
tradition developed in rabbinic Judaism. Jewish tradition reads the biblical
verses that mention violence allegorically: the sword and the bow used by Jacob
the Patriarch against his enemies become symbols of obedience to divine
commandments and good deeds. Tradition locates Jewish heroism in the house of
study, not on the battlefield. But Zionists rejected this tradition as that of
“exilic weaklings.”
Naturally, like
in other locations such as India, America, or Algeria, most inhabitants of
Palestine—Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike—resented the Zionists who began
colonizing Palestine in the late 19th century. Resistance emerged, and
generations of Israelis grew up fighting against it. Palestinians came to be
perceived as a constant source of danger. Educated in the spirit of military
courage, moral superiority, and self-righteousness, the Israeli came to disdain
and replace the Jew. The murder of Jacob De Haan, a Jewish anti-Zionist lawyer,
by members of a Zionist militia in 1924 marked not only the onset of organized
political terrorism in Palestine but also the affirmation of a new national
identity.
Ideals of
martial valour were not only inculcated through the educational system but,
more powerfully, were induced by the predicament of all colonial settlements:
suppressing resistance from the colonized. Generation after generation of
Israelis have participated in the violent “pacification of the natives,”
forcing them to submit to discrimination, dispossession, and ethnic cleansing.
The daily news
of brutalities perpetrated by the Israeli military in Gaza underscores the
success of the Zionist transformation of the Jew. The massive support that
these acts receive from Israeli society at large strongly confirms this. The
recent debate in the Israeli parliament when some Knesset members asserted the
legitimacy of gang raping Palestinian detainees by Israeli soldiers reveals
profound dehumanization—that is, the denial of full humanity in others, along
with the cruelty and suffering that accompany it. But this also threatens the
humanity of the soldier.
To mitigate
this, the soldier must keep a distance from his victim. This is achieved
through the industrialization of murder, which began with gas chambers and
carpet bombing and continued with targeted assassinations by missiles and
kamikaze drones. World-renowned Israeli scientists and engineers, assisted by
major American corporations, have made a qualitative advance in streamlining
remote violence. In Gaza, artificial intelligence (AI) now determines targets
and to destroys them. This points to an abdication not only of their ancestors’
moral values but of humanity altogether.
The Israelis’
war on Gaza confirms a triumph of nurture over nature, all the while
demonstrating that technological progress does not equate to progress in
humanity. In fact, it normalizes amorality, which most Western governments
accept because, in their view, it is Jews who commit these atrocities, whether
qualified as mass murder, ethnic cleansing, or genocide. Few realize that a
century of living by the sword has transformed the Jew into a ruthless Israeli.
Thus, one can better understand Israel as a state and a society when it is no
longer regarded as “the Jewish state”, a nebulous concept that only blurs our
vision and obscures reality. Only then can the world judge Israel on merit like
any other state.
Stephen Semler
The Biden administration recently
approved five major arms sales to Israel for F-15 fighter aircraft, tank
ammunition, tactical vehicles, air-to-air missiles, mortar rounds, and related
equipment for each. Though technically sales, most if not all of this matériel
is paid for by U.S. taxpayers–Israel uses much of the military aid Congress
approves for it effectively as a gift card to buy U.S.-made weapons.
The total value of the five weapons
sales exceeds $20.3 billion.
More extraordinary than the price
tag of these arms deals is that the White House made them public. Prior to last
week’s announcements, it had disclosed just two arms sales to Israel. By March,
the Biden administration had already greenlit more than 100 separate weapons
deals for Israel, or about one every 36 hours, on average. The administration
presumably kept the value of each arms deal “under threshold” to avoid having
to notify Congress.
From 2017 to 2019, the U.S. had
approved thousands of below-threshold arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the United
Arab Emirates worth a total of $11.2 billion. Exploiting this loophole helped
the Trump administration avoid scrutiny of its enabling of a devastating and
indiscriminate bombing campaign in Yemen. The Biden administration appears to
be following the same playbook for the destruction it is enabling in Gaza.
The White House isn’t shy about
publicizing arms transfers to other countries. For example, it has been very
transparent about the military aid it sent Ukraine since February 2022. Biden
promotes arming Ukraine as industrial policy, marketing the military aid as a
boon for domestic manufacturing and jobs. The Pentagon not only itemizes what
specific matériel the U.S. sends to Ukraine, but also shows on a map where in
the U.S. those weapons and equipment are made.
By contrast, nearly all the publicly
available information on U.S. arms transfers to Israel comes from leaks
reported by the media. The Biden administration says very little about the
weapons it delivers to Israel or how the Israeli military uses them. The
following analysis is intended to shed light on both. In doing so, it helps
explain why the Biden administration prefers to arm Israel in secret.
What follows is a non-exhaustive
list of attacks by the Israeli military since October 7 that likely violated
international law, grouped by the type of U.S.-supplied weapon involved in the
attack.
In order for an attack to be listed
below, there must be sufficient evidence that it violated international law. In
all of the following cases, it’s at least more likely than not that the attack
was a violation. Many of them almost certainly were in breach of international
law. This is a very high threshold–as former State Department lawyer Brian
Finucane wrote in Foreign Affairs,
The law of war permits vast death and destruction. This is true even under restrictive interpretations of the law.
Furthermore, in order for an attack
to be listed, there must be concrete forensic evidence that a U.S.-supplied
weapon was likely used to commit the probable violation of international law.
Only the types of weapons the U.S. has reportedly delivered to Israel since
October 7 are considered. This report draws from forensic investigations that
have been conducted by reputable international organizations, civil society
groups, media outlets, and independent analysts.
The following 20 incidents represent
a small fraction of potential war crimes committed with U.S.-provided weapons.
First, information gathering and fact finding is extremely difficult. Israel
restricts U.N. and NGO access to Gaza and doesn’t cooperate with investigations
into misuse of U.S.-supplied arms. Members of the press are routinely denied
access or attacked: Since October 2023, 116 journalists and media workers have
been killed by Israeli airstrikes or sniper fire in Gaza, representing 86 percent
of all those killed worldwide, according to data from the Committee to Protect
Journalists. Prolonged communication blackouts are commonplace in Gaza.
Second, Israel’s military campaign
relies on U.S. weapons, and so U.S. matériel is involved in nearly every facet
of Israel’s campaign. For example, Israel uses U.S.-made aircraft like the
F-35, F-16, and F-15 to drop U.S.-made bombs, including the MK-84 (2,000
pounds), MK-83 (1,000 pounds), MK-82 (500 pounds), and 250-pound “small
diameter” bombs, which can be fitted with U.S.-made Joint Direct Attack
Munition (JDAM) guidance kits.
The vast majority of bombs Israel
drops on Gaza are U.S.-made. The U.S. even provides Israel with jet fuel. The
U.S. has sent so many arms to Israel since October 7 that the Pentagon has
struggled to find sufficient cargo aircraft to deliver the matériel.
Third, Israel’s campaign is
historically destructive. In the three weeks after October 7, Israel dropped an
average of 6,000 bombs on Gaza per week. By comparison, U.S. and coalition
forces dropped on average 488 bombs per week on ISIS militants in Iraq and
Syria during Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) between August 2014 and March
2019. OIR caused immense civilian harm–particularly in densely-populated areas
like Mosul and Raqqa–but the scale of death and destruction doesn’t come close
to what Israel has done in Gaza.
A former high-ranking officer in the
Israeli military told Haaretz that Israeli forces could have made as much
progress as they have so far in Gaza with one-tenth of the destruction. This
“unusually wasteful” and “reckless” conduct “reflects an absolute assumption
that the U.S. will continue to arm and finance it,” he is quoted as saying.
What’s more, according to reporting,
Israel has used an Artificial Intelligence program called “Lavender” to
generate an unprecedented number of bombing targets with minimal human
oversight. The AI program is coded with instructions that appear inconsistent
with international law and is deployed with little to no human oversight.
The Biden administration
acknowledges that Israel likely broke human rights law with U.S.-supplied
weapons, but claims it doesn’t have enough evidence to link U.S.-supplied
weapons to specific violations that would warrant cutting off military aid to
Israel. As national security adviser Jake Sullivan told CBS,
We do not have enough information to reach definitive conclusions about
particular incidents or to make legal determinations, but we do have enough
information to have concern…Our hearts break about the loss of innocent
Palestinian life.
None of that is believable. As this
report demonstrates, there is more than enough available information. If the
Biden administration is truly concerned about the loss of innocent Palestinian
life in Gaza, it can stop Israel’s atrocities by denying it the tools it needs
to commit them.
MK-84 and other 2,000-pound bombs
Amount delivered since October 7: At
least 14,100 (as of June 28). The
U.S. sent Israel at least 14,000 MK-84 2,000-pound bombs from early October to
late June. Another shipment 1,800 MK-84s is pending: The White House approved
their transfer in March, but then paused shipping them in May. The U.S. also
delivered 100 2,000-pound BLU-109 bunker-buster bombs between October 7 and
December 1.
By mid-December, the Biden
administration had already provided Israel with more than 5,000 MK-84
2,000-pound bombs, four times heavier than the largest bombs the U.S. dropped
in Syria and Iraq in its war against ISIS. In the first month of its military offensive
in Gaza, Israeli forces dropped more than 500 2,000-pound bombs, more than 40
percent of which were dropped in Israeli-designated safe zones. Six weeks into
the war, Israel had dropped 2,000-pound bombs in areas to which it had
instructed civilians to flee more than 200 times.
- October 9, 2023: Israeli airstrikes hit a busy market in Jabalia refugee camp, killing at least 69 people. The market was more crowded than usual because people were in the process of fleeing their homes at the instruction of the Israeli military. The U.N. Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) analysis reported that “one or two GBU-31 air dropped munitions were used” and found no military objective to justify the strike. The GBU-31 is made from a U.S.-made 2,000-pound MK 84 or BLU-109 bomb and a JDAM guidance kit. Neither U.N. OHCHR nor Amnesty International found evidence of a military target at the time of the attack. Even if there was a legitimate military target, the scale of destruction indicates the Israeli military’s attack was disproportionate. Disproportionate attacks are war crimes–international law prohibits attacks that are expected to cause excessive civilian harm compared to the direct and provable military advantage anticipated from the attack.
- October 17, 2023: After the Israeli military told Gazans to flee to Khan Yunis for their safety, it bombed the al-Lamdani family house in Khan Yunis. Between 15 and 40 people were killed in the attack. Remnants of a U.S.-made MK-84 2,000-pound bomb were found at the site
- October 25, 2023: Israeli airstrikes flattened at least 5,700 square meters in the Al Yarmouk neighborhood of Gaza City, killing at least 91 people, including 39 children. A U.N. assessment determined that “several” 2,000-pound GBU-31s air-dropped munitions were likely dropped by Israeli forces in the attack. According to a report from U.N. OHCHR, “The use of a GBU-31 or a GBU-32, in such densely populated areas in the middle of residential neighborhoods when extensive civilian harm would be foreseeable, raises very serious concerns that those attacks were disproportionate and/or indiscriminate, and that no or insufficient precautions were taken.”
- October 31, 2023: After Israeli airstrikes on Jabalia, Gaza’s largest refugee camp, a nearby hospital said it received 400 casualties, including 120 dead, most of whom were women and children. An analysis of the site showed at least five craters, the largest one likely from a GBU-31. The GBU-31 is made from a JDAM and either a 2,000-pound BLU-109 or MK-84 bomb. According to reports, Israeli forces gave no warning before the attack, and no effort was made to evacuate the residential buildings. U.N. OHCHR said the attack on Jabalia refugee camp could amount to a war crime.
- January 13, 2024: Israeli forces dropped a U.S.-made MK-84 2,000-pound bomb from a U.S.-made F-16 aircraft on a house in Deir al-Balah but it didn’t explode. A second airstrike did destroy the home, leaving an approximately 40-foot size crater, characteristic of a 2,000-pound bomb with a delayed fuse. The Israeli military had designated Deir al-Balah as a safe zone in October. Israeli forces instructed Palestinians in northern Gaza to flee there on December 11 and told Palestinians in central Gaza the same thing on December 22. By mid-January, Israeli bombing had leveled entire city blocks and dozens of family homes in Deir al-Balah.
GBU-39 and other ‘small diameter’
bombs
Amount delivered since October: At
least 2,600 (as of June). More
than 2,000 of these “small-diameter” bombs are 250-pound GBU-39 munitions.
After Israel received an expedited shipment of 1,000 Boeing-made GBU-39s in
early October, the Biden administration approved the transfer of more than
1,000 GBU-39 bombs for Israel on April 1, the same day that Israeli forces
bombed a World Central Kitchen convoy, killing seven aid workers. It’s likely
that far more GBU-39s have been delivered to Israel than the amount listed
here.
Purportedly out of concern for
Palestinian civilians, the Biden administration is urging the Israeli military
to use more 250-pound GBU-39s and fewer less-precise 2,000-pound bombs. The
result appears to have been a surge in possible war crimes committed with
GBU-39s. The relative size of bombs doesn’t matter much if Israeli forces
disregard fundamental rules governing targeting in international law, including
distinction, precautions, and proportionality. As retired U.S. Air Force master
sergeant Wes Bryant told the New York Times,
While they’re using smaller bombs, they’re still deliberately targeting
where they know there are civilians.
Boeing markets its GBU-39 as a “low
collateral damage” precision weapon. Echoing Boeing, White House spokesperson
John Kirby said Israel’s use of these 250-pound bombs is “certainly indicative
of an effort to be discreet and targeted and precise.” The blast from a GBU-39
bomb can kill or injure people over 1,000 feet away, and shrapnel from the
bomb’s steel casing can kill or injure anyone within 570 feet.
- January 9, 2024: Israeli forces bombed a residential building in a neighborhood the Israeli military had repeatedly ordered displaced Gazans to flee to. The attack killed 18 people, including 10 children, and wounded at least eight others. Israeli forces gave no warning to evacuate. An investigation found no evidence that the building or anyone in it could be considered a legitimate military target. The Israeli government has yet to give a reason for the strike. Fragments from a U.S.-made Boeing GBU-39 were recovered from the rubble.
- May 13, 2024: Israeli forces bombed a school housing displaced civilians in Nuseirat, killing up to 30 people. A tail fin of a U.S.-made GBU-39 was recovered at the location of the strike
- May 26, 2024: An Israeli airstrike on a displacement camp in Rafah filled with makeshift tents killed at least 46 people–including 23 women, children and older adults–and injured more than 240 others. The tail of a U.S.-made GBU-39 bomb was recovered at the site of the attack. The “81873” on the munition fragment is the identifier code the U.S. government assigned to Woodward, a Colorado-based manufacturer that supplies bomb parts, including the GBU-39. The State Department refused to acknowledge that this was a U.S.-made weapon. Israeli forces claimed munitions stored at the camp caused most of the devastation, but there is no evidence of a weapons cache present.
- June 6, 2024: At least two GBU-39 munitions were used in an Israeli airstrike on the UN-run al-Sardi school in Nusreit, central Gaza. At least 40 people were killed in the strike, including nine women and 14 children. About 6,000 displaced Palestinians were sheltering at the school when it was bombed. The Israeli military denied that there were any civilian casualties. Israeli human rights group B’Tselem said the attack is a possible war crime. A U.S.-made navigation device manufactured by Honeywell was also documented at the site.
- August 10, 2024: More than 100 Palestinians were killed in an Israeli airstrike on al-Tabin school in Gaza City, which was being used to shelter displaced people. The Israeli military said it used “precise munitions.” Paramedics who arrived at the scene said they found bodies “ripped to pieces” and that many bodies were unidentifiable. Parents reported difficulty identifying their deceased children. Remnants of at least two Boeing-made GBU-39 small diameter bombs were identified at the scene. Two investigations found no evidence that the school was being used for military operations, as the Israeli military claimed. The list of fighters the Israeli army alleged it killed in the strike included several people who had previously been listed as deceased and civilians with no known military ties.
Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM)
Amount delivered since October 7: At
least 3,000 (as of December 1).
- October 10, 2023: An Israeli airstrike on the al-Najjar family home in Deir al-Balah killed 24 civilians. The code stamped on a recovered munition fragment, 70P862352, indicates that a U.S.-supplied JDAM was used in the attack. The Boeing-made guidance kit was likely fitted to a 2,000-pound bomb. Survivors said Israel gave civilians no warning of an imminent strike. Amnesty International said the attack must be investigated as a war crime.
- October 22, 2023: An Israeli airstrike on the Abu Mu’eileq family home in Deir al-Balah killed 19 people, including 12 children. The home was located in the area to which the Israeli military had ordered residents of northern Gaza to flee on October 13. The code stamped on the recovered scrap, 70P862352, is associated with JDAMs and Boeing. The Boeing-made JDAM kit was fitted to a bomb that weighed at least 1,000-pounds. Survivors said Israel gave no warning of an imminent strike. Amnesty International said the attack must be investigated as a war crime.
- March 27, 2024: An Israeli strike on the Emergency and Relief Corps of the Lebanese Succour Association, a humanitarian organization, killed seven emergency and relief volunteers in southern Lebanon. The strike used a U.S.-made JDAM guidance kit affixed to an Israeli-made 500-pound bomb. Human Rights Watch said that the incident should be investigated as a war crime.
- July 13, 2024: An Israeli strike on the Al-Mawasi–an Israeli military-designated “safe zone”–killed over 90 people and injured hundreds more. Remnants of a U.S.-made JDAM were found at the scene. Based on the size of the fin fragment, the JDAM was likely fitted to either a 1,000- or 2,000-pound bomb.
Hellfire missiles
Amount delivered: At least 3,000 (as of June 28)
- June 8, 2024: Israel’s operation to rescue four hostages in the Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza killed nearly 300 Palestinians. A witness reported Israeli attack helicopters launching many strikes in Nuseirat and surrounding areas. Another witness said 150 rockets fell in less than 10 minutes. Remnants of at least two U.S.-made Hellfire missiles were found in a damaged residential building. Video shows U.S.-made Apache helicopters firing several Hellfire missiles into the Nuseirat refugee camp. The Israeli military also bombed a busy market several blocks south of where the Israeli hostages were kept, and in the opposite direction of the evacuation route. U.N. OHCHR said the raid “seriously calls into question whether the principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution–as set out under the laws of war–were respected by the Israeli forces.”
- June 23, 2024: An Israeli airstrike on a health clinic in Gaza City killed five people, including Hani al-Jaafarawi, Gaza’s director of ambulances and emergency. He was reportedly the 500th medical worker killed during Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The rocket motor of a U.S.-supplied Hellfire missile was recovered at the health care center.
- July 14, 2024: Hundreds of Palestinians were taking refuge at the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) Abu Oraiban school when it was hit by an Israeli airstrike, killing at least 22 people. The Israeli military issued no warning to the displaced people sheltering there before the attack. U.S.-made Hellfire missile fragments were found at the school, including part of its guidance system and motor. (Remnants of a Boeing-made GBU-39’s tail section were also recovered at the site.)
120mm tank shells
Amount delivered since October 7: At
least 13,981. A day after the U.S.
vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and
the unconditional release of hostages, the White House notified Congress on
December 8 that it had approved the sale of 13,981 120mm M830A1 high-explosive
tank cartridges to Israel.
The Biden administration invoked an
emergency authority to bypass the congressional review period. Because the
shells were sourced from U.S. Army inventory, they could be transferred
immediately to Israel.
The day before, Reuters, Human
Rights Watch, and Amnesty International all published investigations providing
evidence that an Israeli tank likely deliberately fired two Israeli-made 120mm
shells at a group of journalists in southern Lebanon in October, killing one
Reuters journalist and injuring six others. Both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty
International said the incident was an apparent war crime. Israeli tanks have
also struck hospitals and humanitarian shelters using 120mm tank rounds. On
August 13, the Biden administration notified Congress that it approved a $774
million arms sale to Israel for 32,739 120mm tank cartridges.
- January 29, 2024: Six-year-old Hind Rajab was the only survivor in her family’s car after Israeli tanks opened fire. Over the phone, Hind begged rescue workers to come save her. The Palestine Red Crescent Society dispatched an ambulance with two emergency workers. At least one Israeli tank opened fire, killing both paramedics. A fragment of a U.S.-made M830A1 120mm tank round was documented at the scene.
155mm artillery shells
Amount delivered: At least 57,000 (as of December 1). This total
includes thousands of 155mm rounds originally for Ukraine that the Biden
administration diverted to Israel in October. Netanyahu specifically requested
155mm artillery shells from U.S. lawmakers in mid-November.
Around the same time, more than 30
organizations urged the Biden administration to not supply Israel with these
munitions because their inaccuracy and 100-300 meter casualty radius make them
“inherently indiscriminate” in the Gaza context. “It is difficult to imagine a
scenario in which high explosive 155mm artillery shells could be used in Gaza
in compliance with [international humanitarian law],” the organizations wrote.
On December 29, the White House
notified Congress that it approved the sale of an additional 57,021 155mm
shells to Israel. The Biden administration invoked an emergency authority to
bypass the congressional review period. Israeli forces will likely fire these
rounds from U.S.-made howitzers. The Israeli military announced earlier that
month it fired over 100,000 artillery rounds during the first 40 days of its
ground invasion of Gaza, adding that artillery plays a “central role” by
providing “intense fire cover” for its ground forces.
- October 16: Israeli forces fired 155mm artillery shells containing white phosphorus into Dhayra, southern Lebanon. At least nine civilians were killed and civilian property was damaged. Lot production codes found on the shells indicate they were made in the U.S. Amnesty International said the attack was indiscriminate and must be investigated as a war crime.
Armored vehicles
Amount delivered since October 7:
Unknown. The Israeli Ministry
of Defense reported on October 19 that U.S. Air Force cargo airplanes delivered
the first tranche of U.S.-made David light armored vehicles, part of a $22
million arms deal from April 2023.
- November 14, 2023: The first photo below from the Israeli Ministry of Defense shows David light armor vehicles after being unloaded from a U.S. Air Force C-17 at Ben Gurion Airport on October 19. The second photo shows Israeli forces using David light armor vehicles to obstruct an ambulance en route to a hospital on November 14, arresting the wounded person inside. International humanitarian law prohibits attacks on and obstruction of medical transport.
No comments:
Post a Comment