اندیشمند بزرگترین احساسش عشق است و هر عملش با خرد

Friday, April 25, 2025

Israeli writer says aiding Gaza is like ‘feeding sharks’

In a post remembering the Holocaust, Gil Kopatz called for the extermination of Palestinians and described the war on Gaza as an essential ‘pesticide’
 A Palestinian child eats his portion of a hot meal at a free food distribution point at the Nuseirat refugee camp, central Gaza Strip, on 19 April 2025 (AFP/Eyad Baba)
 A Palestinian child eats his portion of a hot meal at a free food distribution point at the Nuseirat refugee camp, central Gaza Strip, on 19 April 2025 (AFP/Eyad Baba)
An Israeli screenwriter said he backs “exterminating Gazans” as he compared sending aid to Palestinians to “feeding sharks”.
In a Facebook post earlier this week, Gil Kopatz, a screenwriter and actor, wrote: “If you feed sharks, they end up eating you. If you feed Gazans, they end up eating you.
"I am in favour of shark extinction and in favour of exterminating Gazans.”
He concluded the post with: “Reflections on Holocaust Day 2025.”
The comments provoked outrage online and across political circles. Ahmad Tibi, a Palestinian politician with Israeli citizenship, sharply criticised Kopatz.
“This is how this Jewish individual marks Holocaust Remembrance Day. Gil Kopatch, you are a neo-Nazi degenerate,” Tibi wrote on X.
In a follow-up post, Kopatz appeared to double down on his remarks.
“I don’t have even one drop of compassion for Gazans. For Arabs in general, yes. For humans in general, yes. For sharks, no. And not for human animals either,” he said.
Despite the inflammatory language, Kopatz described himself as a “humane, liberal and moral person”.
“I don’t treat those who grew up in Gaza and have been fed, since childhood, murderous racist hatred towards my family and my brothers and sisters, as human beings,” he added.
“And to wrap up, it is not genocide, it’s pesticide, and it’s essential to do it.”
Since the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza in October 2023, Israeli officials and commentators have faced criticism for using increasingly inflammatory and dehumanising language to describe Palestinians in the besieged enclave.
As the ground invasion began, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu referenced the biblical tale of Amalek - a move critics described as a “genocidal invocation”.
Former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant referred to Palestinians in Gaza as “human animals” as he announced plans to cut electricity, water and food supplies to the territory in the early days of the war.
Other Israeli ministers have suggested dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza and called for “erasing” the Palestinian enclave “from the face of the earth”.
 
 
H. Scott Prosterman
Oakland, Ca. (Special to Informed Comment; Featured) – On April 15, the venerable Jewish Council on Public Affairs (JCPA) issued an eloquent statement stating their objections to, “the false choice between confronting antisemitism and upholding democracy.” antisemitismhas traditionally been used as a right-wing tool to appeal to a primitive, nativist sense of exclusion. Now the motivations are more varied and complex. Many on the left fail to distinguish between Judaism, the religion; and Zionism; the political dynamic that led to the creation of Israel in the aftermath of the Holocaust, preceded by a 1000 years of pogroms. antisemitism has been convicted felon Donald Trump’s guise and cover for suppressing academic freedoms, and deporting politically active students, faculty and organizers. Thankfully, this consortium of thoughtful Jewish organizations has countered this travesty with a united effort and lucid arguments.
These organizations represent a broad spectrum of Jewish Americans, and includes the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, National Council of Jewish Women, American Conference of Cantors, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, Rabbinical Assembly, Reconstructing Judaism, Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, and the Union for Reform Judaism. The only branch of Judaism not represented in this consortium has been the Orthodox community. While many Orthodox Jews endorse the JCPA point of view, their voices are often suppressed and intimidated in their congregations.
That 10 major Jewish organizations came to agreement on anything is a semantic and polemical miracle, when one considers the diversity of social and spiritual divisions among American Jews. The notion of so many Jews agreeing on ANYTHING is so ludicrous, it’s become a basis of satire and dark humor. The myth that Jews were capable of controlling things by a conspiracy was always as silly as the notion of Jewish space lasers. The notion was fictionalized to support tropes, stir fear and resentment.
The JCPA statement says, “In recent weeks, escalating federal actions have used the guise of fighting antisemitism to justify stripping students of due process rights when they face arrest and/or deportation, as well as to threaten billions in academic research and education funding. Students have been arrested at home and on the street with no transparency as to why they are being held or deported, and in certain cases with the implication that they are being punished for their constitutionally-protected speech. Universities have an obligation to protect Jewish students, and the federal government has an important role to play in that effort; however, sweeping draconian funding cuts will weaken the free academic inquiry that strengthens democracy and society, rather than productively counter antisemitism on campus.” They conclude, “These actions do not make Jews—or any community—safer. Rather, they only make us less safe,” as they bring additional sources of resentment against Jews.
The politics of convicted felon Donald Trump has fueled this misuse of the charge of racial bigotry in numerous ways,  and his use of it is disingenuous on many levels. 21st Century antisemitism is more complex and threatening that any time since World War II, as it now comes from both sides of the political spectrum. There’s also an argument that the Israel Likud government under PM Benjamin Netanyahu (Bibi) has fueled antisemitism with its brutal genocide in Gaza. The tragedies in Gaza have prompted many thoughtful Jews to divorce political Zionism from their practice of Judaism. Under Bibi and Likud, Zionism has devolved 180 degrees away from its original, late-19th century ideals. It began as a secular, agrarian movement with no pretense of Jewish supremacism.
Trump’s claim on Jewish support is limited to the far-right fringes in the US and Israel, who fail to recognize that friends don’t let friends commit political-economic suicide. Presidents Carter, Clinton and Obama were those kinds of friends. Trump is happy to encourage Bibi’s path of self-destruction. Supporters and financiers of Israel’s illegal settlement movement don’t mind being used in this manner. Nor do American Jews whose knowledge of Israel-Palestine history is willfully limited to the whitewashed Temple Sunday School myths. Most of them don’t want to know any more than they don’t already know, and are quite stubborn about it.
Counterintuitively, Trump’s 2019 Executive Order, declaring that Jews are a race and nationality was the first salvo in a campaign to USE antisemitism as a cover for attacks on academic freedom. I noted then, “Packaged as an extension of Title VI, the order reads (in the language of this Brave New World), “Discrimination against Jews may give rise to a Title VI violation when the discrimination is based on an individual’s race, color, or national origin.” The semantic and rhetorical problem here is that we Jews have never considered ourselves to be a group with a single national origin; we come in many colors, and from many national origins. This Executive Order also solidified the myth that Judaism and Zionism are one and the same. Outside of the devoted far-right camps of the MAGA-Likud alliance, most Jews object to seeing charges of antisemitism used as a machete to shred the Constitution.
Most significant is the JCPA’s qualified dissociation from Israel’s ruling Likud Party under PM Benjamin Netanyahu, characterizing it as a “foreign government.” It states, “Jews are being targeted and held collectively accountable for the actions of a foreign government.” As a result of Israel’s genocidal acts in Gaza and the West Bank, “Jews are being pushed out of certain movements, classrooms, and communities for expressing a connection to their heritage or to the Jewish homeland.” While Israel is considered the “Jewish homeland,” and a focal point of modern Judaism for many, this also expresses recognition of how Bibi’s MAGA-inspired strategy has alienated many Jews from Israel, and escalated global antisemitism.
The JCPA statement continues, “We reject any policies or actions that foment or take advantage of antisemitism and pit communities against one another; and we unequivocally condemn the exploitation of our community’s real concerns about antisemitism to undermine democratic norms and rights, including the rule of law, the right of due process, and/or the freedoms of speech, press, and peaceful protest. It is both possible and necessary to fight antisemitism—on campus, in our communities, and across the country—without abandoning the democratic values that have allowed Jews, and so many other vulnerable minorities, to thrive.” It concludes, “Our safety as Jews has always been tied to the rule of law, to the safety of others, to the strength of civil society, and to the protection of rights and liberties for all.”
 
 
April 24, 2025
Caitlin Johnstone
The Irish-language hip hop trio Kneecap is being investigated by British counterterrorism police following a controversial appearance where the group performed in front of the words “FUCK ISRAEL, FREE PALESTINE” during a music festival in the United States.
Zionist outrage over the incident led to a video being shared on Twitter by a man named Danny Morris who works for Community Security Trust, a British organization dedicated to supporting Israel in the name of fighting antisemitism. The video apparently shows Kneecap chanting “Up Hamas, up Hezbollah” at a London concert last November, which is the official reason the group is now under investigation.
By designating Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations and then passing laws against support for proscribed terrorist groups, the British government has effectively given itself the authority to stomp out any speech which can be deemed supportive of armed groups opposing Israel’s abuses in the middle east today, and has been using this authority to persecute journalists and activists in the UK.
This is just one of the latest incidents in the steady assault on free speech rights we’ve been seeing in the western nations that have aligned themselves with the state of Israel during the Gaza holocaust.
In Michigan the homes of pro-Palestine demonstrators are reportedly being raided by the FBI and by state and local police, with numerous activists detained and electronic devices seized under search warrants.
A new policy unveiled by the Trump administration’s National Institutes of Health bans researchers and university employees from participating in any activism involving boycotts or divestment from the state of Israel, or even advocating such measures.
New York Police Department officers are reportedly attending training on combatting antisemitism which teaches them that keffiyehs and watermelons are antisemitic symbols, and that phrases like “settler colonialism” and “all eyes on Rafah” are examples of antisemitic hate speech.
On Thursday a judge ruled that Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk shall be transferred to the state of Vermont as the Trump administration fights to deport her. Öztürk’s sole offense is having written an op-ed in the university paper mildly denouncing Israel’s atrocities in Gaza.
This all comes as a new poll finds that a majority of Americans oppose the Trump administration’s new policy of deporting foreigners for expressing wrongthink about Israel. They’re taking away the right of US citizens to hear what Israel’s critics have to say, and they are doing so directly against the will of the US citizens themselves.
There’s a video that Israel apologists are sharing around which they claim shows pro-Palestine activists blocking Jewish students from walking through the campus of Yale University, and it’s just so illustrative of the fake “antisemitism” crisis we’re being told necessitates the elimination of free speech rights throughout all of western civilization.
If you watch the clip you can see a student wearing a kippah being filmed by someone behind him and demanding to walk directly through what appears to be a relatively small group of activists in the midst of an anti-genocide demonstration. The demonstrators are heard telling him to walk around them, which is what any normal person does when they wish to be on the other side of a physical human body (or indeed any physical object), and you can clearly see people walking around them in the background of the video.
This is like walking up to a cheer squad in the middle of a human pyramid, demanding to walk through them, and then claiming they refused to do so because they hate your religion. It’s just so transparently bat shit insane, but it’s being shared around in all seriousness by Zionist pundits and politicians as a sign of an antisemitism crisis at a prominent university. This is the kind of evidence that’s being cited for the need to stomp out free speech in our society.
I’m going to keep saying it and saying it until the message gets through: Zionism is the single greatest threat to free speech in the western world today. Nothing is eroding people’s rights to free expression faster than the support that western governments have for the apartheid state of Israel and the atrocities it is committing.
This isn’t just about Gaza now. It’s not just about some strangers in the middle east. It’s about you. It’s about your rights. It’s about your right to tell the truth, even if the truth makes your leaders feel uncomfortable.
Even if you are not a sufficiently moral and compassionate person to oppose a genocide on its own merit, at this point you should at least be opposing the erosion of your own personal liberties for your own sake.

No comments:

Post a Comment