November 20, 2025
Brad Reed
In a report published on
Thursday, the AP revealed that the Border Patrol has been using a “predictive
intelligence program” that surveils and flags drivers as suspicious based
solely on “where they came from, where they were going, and which route they took.”
The Border Patrol then passes this information on to local law enforcement officials, who will then pull over the targeted vehicles based on flimsy pretexts such as minor speed-limit violations, having tinted windows, and even having “a dangling air freshener” that purportedly obstructs drivers’ views.
From there, the drivers are subjected to aggressive questioning and vehicle searches that in some cases have resulted in arrests despite no evidence of criminal behavior on the part of the drivers.
To illustrate this, the AP told the story of Lorenzo Gutierrez Lugo, a truck driver whose work entails “transporting furniture, clothing, and other belongings to families in Mexico” across the US border.
After Gutierrez Lugo’s driving routes got him flagged by the surveillance system, he was pulled over in southern Texas by local law enforcement officials, who proceeded to search his vehicle for contraband.
Although officials found no illicit goods in his truck, they nonetheless arrested him on suspicion of money laundering because he was in possession of thousands of dollars in cash. However, Luis Barrios, who owns the trucking company that employed Gutierrez Lugo, explained to the AP that customers who receive deliveries often pay drivers directly in cash.
Although no criminal charges were ultimately brought against Gutierrez Lugo, Barrios nonetheless said that his company had to spend $20,000 in legal fees to both clear his driver’s name and to return company property that had been impounded by police.
The AP notes that operations such as this are symbolic of “the quiet transformation of [the US Border Patrol’s] parent agency, US Customs and Border Protection, into something more akin to a domestic intelligence operation.”
Former law enforcement officials also tell the AP that the Border Patrol has gone to great lengths to keep its mass surveillance program a secret by trying to ensure that it is never mentioned in court documents and police reports. In fact, the Border Patrol in some cases has even dropped criminal cases against suspects for fear that details about the mass surveillance program would be revealed at trial.
In a post on X, journalist Mike LaSusa remarked that this Border Patrol program represents “another example of powerful, invasive, mass surveillance tech being wielded by US immigration authorities.” He added that “so much about these programs is hidden from the public, making it difficult to know whether they keep Americans safe or violate privacy protections.”
The program has been increasingly expanding from the border regions of the US into the interior of the country as well, and it discovered that US Customs and Border Protection “has placed at least four cameras in the greater Phoenix area over the years, one of which was more than 120 miles (193 kilometers) from the Mexican frontier, beyond the agency’s usual jurisdiction of 100 miles (161 kilometers) from a land or sea border.”
Additionally, the AP found that the program is “impacting residents of big metropolitan areas and people driving to and from large cities such as Chicago and Detroit, as well as from Los Angeles, San Antonio, and Houston to and from the Mexican border region.”
Nicole Ozer, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Democracy at UC Law San Francisco, told the AP that US Customs and Border Protection is engaging in “dragnet surveillance of Americans on the streets, on the highways, in their cities, in their communities” while “collecting mass amounts of information about who people are, where they go, what they do, and who they know.”
“These surveillance systems do not make communities safer,” Ozer emphasized.
Brad Reed
The Border Patrol is engaging in
“dragnet surveillance of Americans on the streets, on the highways, in their
cities, in their communities,” charged one critic.
The Associated Press has exposed
what it describes as a “mass surveillance network” being run by the US Border
Patrol that is increasingly ensnaring US drivers who have committed no crimes.
The Border Patrol then passes this information on to local law enforcement officials, who will then pull over the targeted vehicles based on flimsy pretexts such as minor speed-limit violations, having tinted windows, and even having “a dangling air freshener” that purportedly obstructs drivers’ views.
From there, the drivers are subjected to aggressive questioning and vehicle searches that in some cases have resulted in arrests despite no evidence of criminal behavior on the part of the drivers.
To illustrate this, the AP told the story of Lorenzo Gutierrez Lugo, a truck driver whose work entails “transporting furniture, clothing, and other belongings to families in Mexico” across the US border.
After Gutierrez Lugo’s driving routes got him flagged by the surveillance system, he was pulled over in southern Texas by local law enforcement officials, who proceeded to search his vehicle for contraband.
Although officials found no illicit goods in his truck, they nonetheless arrested him on suspicion of money laundering because he was in possession of thousands of dollars in cash. However, Luis Barrios, who owns the trucking company that employed Gutierrez Lugo, explained to the AP that customers who receive deliveries often pay drivers directly in cash.
Although no criminal charges were ultimately brought against Gutierrez Lugo, Barrios nonetheless said that his company had to spend $20,000 in legal fees to both clear his driver’s name and to return company property that had been impounded by police.
The AP notes that operations such as this are symbolic of “the quiet transformation of [the US Border Patrol’s] parent agency, US Customs and Border Protection, into something more akin to a domestic intelligence operation.”
Former law enforcement officials also tell the AP that the Border Patrol has gone to great lengths to keep its mass surveillance program a secret by trying to ensure that it is never mentioned in court documents and police reports. In fact, the Border Patrol in some cases has even dropped criminal cases against suspects for fear that details about the mass surveillance program would be revealed at trial.
In a post on X, journalist Mike LaSusa remarked that this Border Patrol program represents “another example of powerful, invasive, mass surveillance tech being wielded by US immigration authorities.” He added that “so much about these programs is hidden from the public, making it difficult to know whether they keep Americans safe or violate privacy protections.”
The program has been increasingly expanding from the border regions of the US into the interior of the country as well, and it discovered that US Customs and Border Protection “has placed at least four cameras in the greater Phoenix area over the years, one of which was more than 120 miles (193 kilometers) from the Mexican frontier, beyond the agency’s usual jurisdiction of 100 miles (161 kilometers) from a land or sea border.”
Additionally, the AP found that the program is “impacting residents of big metropolitan areas and people driving to and from large cities such as Chicago and Detroit, as well as from Los Angeles, San Antonio, and Houston to and from the Mexican border region.”
Nicole Ozer, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Democracy at UC Law San Francisco, told the AP that US Customs and Border Protection is engaging in “dragnet surveillance of Americans on the streets, on the highways, in their cities, in their communities” while “collecting mass amounts of information about who people are, where they go, what they do, and who they know.”
“These surveillance systems do not make communities safer,” Ozer emphasized.
No comments:
Post a Comment