December 18, 2025
Sharon Zhang
Sharon Zhang
Immigration
officials have reportedly issued guidance setting a quota of 100 to 200
denaturalization cases a month.
The Trump
administration has reportedly set a goal of yanking citizenship away from over
a thousand naturalized Americans in fiscal year 2026, in yet another escalation
in the administration’s sweeping immigration crackdown.
New guidance issued on Tuesday directs the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) field offices to “supply Office of Immigration Litigation with 100-200 denaturalization cases per month” next year, according to The New York Times.
Denaturalization is extremely rare. Per the Times, Justice Department figures say that only about 120 denaturalization cases had been filed since 2017, in sharp contrast to the potentially thousands of cases the administration is seeking to file in just one year.
According to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, only 11 denaturalization cases were opened per year on average between 1990 and 2017; there was an uptick during the first Trump administration of about 25 cases a year, but nowhere near their current stated goal.
Experts have noted that the Trump administration’s guidance will be extremely hard, if not impossible, to carry out through typical legal pathways. Only federal courts can strip away citizenship, and the threshold for denaturalization is high, happening primarily in cases where the government alleges citizenship was obtained fraudulently.
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that citizenship and naturalization are too precious and fundamental to our democracy for the government to take it away on their whim,” former USCIS policy chief Amanda Baran told The New York Times. “Instead of wasting resources digging through Americans’ files, USCIS should do its job of processing applications, as Congress mandated.”
One former Department of Homeland Security official, Morgan Bailey, told Newsweek that it would be “virtually impossible” for officials to process the number of cases that the new guidance demands. “USCIS could send more cases to the Justice Department by lowering the threshold, but the DOJ’s burden and the standard required by the DOJ to bring these cases in federal court haven’t changed,” Bailey said.
The Trump administration has been charging forth with many immigration enforcement actions that experts have said are illegal, seeking to target nearly every pathway of immigration. The Justice Department said in a memo this summer that the administration will “maximally pursue” denaturalization efforts, targeting people the administration “determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.”
Experts say the new guidance will strike fear into Americans, particularly those in communities that have been targeted in the Trump administration’s racist crackdown.
“Setting a quota for denaturalization is vicious and cruel, and designed to send a message of fear,” said American Immigration Council fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick on social media. “But each case must be proved in front of a federal judge, and the DOJ is already stretched paper thin, so like [Stephen] Miller’s effort to do this in Trump 1.0 it may be more bark than bite.”
“Requiring monthly quotas that are 10 times higher than the total annual number of denaturalizations in recent years turns a serious and rare tool into a blunt instrument and fuels unnecessary fear and uncertainty for the millions of naturalized Americans,” former USCIS official Sarah Pierce told the Times.
Henry A. Giroux
This language is not Trump’s alone. It is the language of MAGA politics and everything that enables it.
There are moments when death demands humility, compassion, and moral restraint. Donald Trump, more often than not, answers such moments with cruelty. His reaction to the deaths of actor and filmmaker Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, is not merely a morally repugnant expression of indecency; it is emblematic of an age in which ruthless brutality has become a political style and empathy is treated as a weakness, if not a toxic infirmity.
While Trump’s post about Reiner on Truth Social started off in a relatively straightforward manner, calling the deaths “a very sad thing,” it devolved by the second sentence:
Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS. He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace!
What should have been a moment of collective mourning was instead seized as an opportunity for ridicule, revenge, hatred, and ideological warfare.
Trump’s response exposes the ugliness at the core of his personality and politics. Two people were murdered, a family was shattered, and yet he responds not with gravity, restraint, or even the pretense of compassion, but instead with gleeful malice, attacking Reiner for the unforgivable crime of refusing to affirm Trump’s corrupt, reactionary, white supremacist worldview — even insinuating that Reiner’s political beliefs may have caused Reiner’s death. This is not simply self-absorption run amok; it is the moral signature of a political culture in which cruelty is normalized, public life is stripped of ethical considerations, and suffering becomes raw material for spectacle and punishment. This is not an aberrant outburst or a momentary lapse. It is the logic of a political identity shaped by ethical tranquilization, hatred, authoritarianism, and a culture that treats cruelty as a form of power.
More broadly, Trump’s conversion of Reiner’s death into an occasion for political opportunism, at a moment that demands humility and collective grief, exposes a deeper rot at work, one that reflects a culture steeped in cruelty, organized indifference, and the collapse of social responsibility. Unable to acknowledge suffering beyond his own ego, he turns public life into a theater of dehumanization and punishment, targeting critics for their refusal to submit to his authoritarian imagination. Trump is the hypertrophied expression of a political culture driven by gangster capitalism, racism, and racial cleansing, a culture in which conscience has collapsed, democracy has been hollowed out, and cruelty has been normalized as a mode of power. In such a culture, death is no longer sacred, mourning is no longer collective, and public language itself becomes a weapon. We live at a time
Trump’s response to the deaths of Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner belongs squarely to this moral landscape. His rant is not a deviation from political norms but their grotesque culmination, revealing the glaring attributes of the fascist subject on steroids: the absence of empathy, the fetishization of punishment, and the conversion of grief into spectacle. When Trump was asked by a reporter about his widely criticized remarks, he doubled down, claiming, “He was a deranged person … I was not a fan of Rob Reiner in any way, shape or form. I thought he was very bad for our country.”
Given Trump’s long record of ruthless attacks on his critics, there is nothing novel in his venom toward Reiner. What is new, and deeply disturbing, is the evident pleasure he takes in the assault, coupled with the chilling insinuation that one of his own supporters carried out the killing. In that moment, Trump’s language crosses into something almost unthinkable, evoking a moral abyss reminiscent of Kurtz in Heart of Darkness: a descent into a politics stripped of restraint, empathy, and reality itself. Reiner’s politics help explain why he became a target. A filmmaker whose work consistently affirmed democratic values, he was a longtime advocate for social justice, opposing the Iraq War, fighting for marriage equality, supporting early childhood education, and later confronting the rise of Christian nationalism. He was also an unflinching critic of Trump, warning early on that Trump was “mentally unfit” for office and later describing the administration’s assault on the media and public culture as a slide toward autocracy.
In Trump’s world, such dissent is not merely disagreement; it is a provocation. His ideology asserts that those who defend democracy, name authoritarianism, or expose the machinery of power must be stripped of dignity and rendered disposable through a language that dehumanizes, vilifies, and invites punishment. It is precisely this moral inversion, where cruelty becomes a political virtue, that prompts a broader reckoning with the kind of figure Trump is and the culture that sustains him.
As New Yorker editor David Remnick observes, such moments force an unsettling reckoning. “And so it is worth asking,” Remnick writes, “do you know anyone quite as malevolent? At your place of work? On your campus? A colleague? A teacher? Much less someone whose impulses and furies in no small measure dictate the direction, fate, and temper of the country? Have you ever in your life encountered a character as wretched as Donald Trump?” Remnick’s questions do not merely condemn a man; they indict a political culture willing to place such a figure at its center, normalizing indecency, rewarding cruelty, and treating moral collapse as a form of strength.
There is more than ugliness and cruelty at work in Trump’s response to the deaths of Rob and Michele Reiner. What is also on display is what Hannah Arendt famously called the banality of evil, a corrosive thoughtlessness that she believed lay at the heart of the making of the fascist subject and totalitarian regimes and the violence they enacted, up to and including genocidal actions. Trump’s comments do not emerge in a vacuum. They resonate with, and reinforce, a culture that traffics in dehumanization while portraying critics and dissidents as dangerous enemies of the state.
The hypocrisy surrounding Trump’s attack on Rob Reiner should not be overlooked. In the wake of his remarks, a number of mainstream outlets, including Time magazine, ran headlines suggesting that many Republicans were offended by Trump’s vilification of Reiner for his political beliefs. Framed this way, the story implies a sudden rediscovery of moral restraint within the Republican Party. But that claim collapses on closer inspection.
What these accounts largely omit is that MAGA Republicans have shown no such concern for civility or restraint when violence serves their political ends. After the September shooting of conservative commentator and close Trump ally Charlie Kirk, MAGA figures were relentless in condemning what they called “political and celebratory responses,” weaponizing the tragedy to demand greater restrictions on free speech and to justify punishing liberal and progressive groups Trump despised. In this context, outrage was not about decency or respect for the dead, but about exploiting grief to expand authoritarian power.
Trump’s offensive language in the face of personal tragedy, then, is not an aberration but part of a well-established pattern. After Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, was brutally attacked in 2022 and left gravely injured, Trump, Elon Musk, and a chorus of MAGA supporters crossed even the minimal boundaries of political decency by mocking the assault. The selective outrage over Reiner thus reveals less about Republican conscience than about the cynicism of a political culture in which cruelty is condemned only when it momentarily becomes inconvenient.
Taken together, these episodes reveal that Trump’s rhetoric is not a lapse in judgment or a matter of personal spite but rather a governing language of power — one that circulates far beyond the man himself and embeds cruelty, selective outrage, and dehumanization into the political culture. This language is not Trump’s alone. It is the language of MAGA politics and everything that enables it, including far right extremism, ICE, reactionary politicians, predatory billionaires, and, increasingly, institutions that surrender their democratic responsibilities in the face of an emerging authoritarianism in the United States. History offers no comfort here. When cruelty becomes routine, and dehumanization becomes common sense, language does not merely reflect violence, it prepares the ground for it. The endpoint of such brutalizing rhetoric is the colonization of consciousness, the normalization of state terror, and the steady march toward targeted persecution, prisons, and torture chambers. To ignore this is not neutrality; it is complicity.
New guidance issued on Tuesday directs the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) field offices to “supply Office of Immigration Litigation with 100-200 denaturalization cases per month” next year, according to The New York Times.
Denaturalization is extremely rare. Per the Times, Justice Department figures say that only about 120 denaturalization cases had been filed since 2017, in sharp contrast to the potentially thousands of cases the administration is seeking to file in just one year.
According to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, only 11 denaturalization cases were opened per year on average between 1990 and 2017; there was an uptick during the first Trump administration of about 25 cases a year, but nowhere near their current stated goal.
Experts have noted that the Trump administration’s guidance will be extremely hard, if not impossible, to carry out through typical legal pathways. Only federal courts can strip away citizenship, and the threshold for denaturalization is high, happening primarily in cases where the government alleges citizenship was obtained fraudulently.
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that citizenship and naturalization are too precious and fundamental to our democracy for the government to take it away on their whim,” former USCIS policy chief Amanda Baran told The New York Times. “Instead of wasting resources digging through Americans’ files, USCIS should do its job of processing applications, as Congress mandated.”
One former Department of Homeland Security official, Morgan Bailey, told Newsweek that it would be “virtually impossible” for officials to process the number of cases that the new guidance demands. “USCIS could send more cases to the Justice Department by lowering the threshold, but the DOJ’s burden and the standard required by the DOJ to bring these cases in federal court haven’t changed,” Bailey said.
The Trump administration has been charging forth with many immigration enforcement actions that experts have said are illegal, seeking to target nearly every pathway of immigration. The Justice Department said in a memo this summer that the administration will “maximally pursue” denaturalization efforts, targeting people the administration “determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.”
Experts say the new guidance will strike fear into Americans, particularly those in communities that have been targeted in the Trump administration’s racist crackdown.
“Setting a quota for denaturalization is vicious and cruel, and designed to send a message of fear,” said American Immigration Council fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick on social media. “But each case must be proved in front of a federal judge, and the DOJ is already stretched paper thin, so like [Stephen] Miller’s effort to do this in Trump 1.0 it may be more bark than bite.”
“Requiring monthly quotas that are 10 times higher than the total annual number of denaturalizations in recent years turns a serious and rare tool into a blunt instrument and fuels unnecessary fear and uncertainty for the millions of naturalized Americans,” former USCIS official Sarah Pierce told the Times.
Henry A. Giroux
This language is not Trump’s alone. It is the language of MAGA politics and everything that enables it.
There are moments when death demands humility, compassion, and moral restraint. Donald Trump, more often than not, answers such moments with cruelty. His reaction to the deaths of actor and filmmaker Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, is not merely a morally repugnant expression of indecency; it is emblematic of an age in which ruthless brutality has become a political style and empathy is treated as a weakness, if not a toxic infirmity.
While Trump’s post about Reiner on Truth Social started off in a relatively straightforward manner, calling the deaths “a very sad thing,” it devolved by the second sentence:
Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS. He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace!
What should have been a moment of collective mourning was instead seized as an opportunity for ridicule, revenge, hatred, and ideological warfare.
Trump’s response exposes the ugliness at the core of his personality and politics. Two people were murdered, a family was shattered, and yet he responds not with gravity, restraint, or even the pretense of compassion, but instead with gleeful malice, attacking Reiner for the unforgivable crime of refusing to affirm Trump’s corrupt, reactionary, white supremacist worldview — even insinuating that Reiner’s political beliefs may have caused Reiner’s death. This is not simply self-absorption run amok; it is the moral signature of a political culture in which cruelty is normalized, public life is stripped of ethical considerations, and suffering becomes raw material for spectacle and punishment. This is not an aberrant outburst or a momentary lapse. It is the logic of a political identity shaped by ethical tranquilization, hatred, authoritarianism, and a culture that treats cruelty as a form of power.
More broadly, Trump’s conversion of Reiner’s death into an occasion for political opportunism, at a moment that demands humility and collective grief, exposes a deeper rot at work, one that reflects a culture steeped in cruelty, organized indifference, and the collapse of social responsibility. Unable to acknowledge suffering beyond his own ego, he turns public life into a theater of dehumanization and punishment, targeting critics for their refusal to submit to his authoritarian imagination. Trump is the hypertrophied expression of a political culture driven by gangster capitalism, racism, and racial cleansing, a culture in which conscience has collapsed, democracy has been hollowed out, and cruelty has been normalized as a mode of power. In such a culture, death is no longer sacred, mourning is no longer collective, and public language itself becomes a weapon. We live at a time
Trump’s response to the deaths of Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner belongs squarely to this moral landscape. His rant is not a deviation from political norms but their grotesque culmination, revealing the glaring attributes of the fascist subject on steroids: the absence of empathy, the fetishization of punishment, and the conversion of grief into spectacle. When Trump was asked by a reporter about his widely criticized remarks, he doubled down, claiming, “He was a deranged person … I was not a fan of Rob Reiner in any way, shape or form. I thought he was very bad for our country.”
Given Trump’s long record of ruthless attacks on his critics, there is nothing novel in his venom toward Reiner. What is new, and deeply disturbing, is the evident pleasure he takes in the assault, coupled with the chilling insinuation that one of his own supporters carried out the killing. In that moment, Trump’s language crosses into something almost unthinkable, evoking a moral abyss reminiscent of Kurtz in Heart of Darkness: a descent into a politics stripped of restraint, empathy, and reality itself. Reiner’s politics help explain why he became a target. A filmmaker whose work consistently affirmed democratic values, he was a longtime advocate for social justice, opposing the Iraq War, fighting for marriage equality, supporting early childhood education, and later confronting the rise of Christian nationalism. He was also an unflinching critic of Trump, warning early on that Trump was “mentally unfit” for office and later describing the administration’s assault on the media and public culture as a slide toward autocracy.
In Trump’s world, such dissent is not merely disagreement; it is a provocation. His ideology asserts that those who defend democracy, name authoritarianism, or expose the machinery of power must be stripped of dignity and rendered disposable through a language that dehumanizes, vilifies, and invites punishment. It is precisely this moral inversion, where cruelty becomes a political virtue, that prompts a broader reckoning with the kind of figure Trump is and the culture that sustains him.
As New Yorker editor David Remnick observes, such moments force an unsettling reckoning. “And so it is worth asking,” Remnick writes, “do you know anyone quite as malevolent? At your place of work? On your campus? A colleague? A teacher? Much less someone whose impulses and furies in no small measure dictate the direction, fate, and temper of the country? Have you ever in your life encountered a character as wretched as Donald Trump?” Remnick’s questions do not merely condemn a man; they indict a political culture willing to place such a figure at its center, normalizing indecency, rewarding cruelty, and treating moral collapse as a form of strength.
There is more than ugliness and cruelty at work in Trump’s response to the deaths of Rob and Michele Reiner. What is also on display is what Hannah Arendt famously called the banality of evil, a corrosive thoughtlessness that she believed lay at the heart of the making of the fascist subject and totalitarian regimes and the violence they enacted, up to and including genocidal actions. Trump’s comments do not emerge in a vacuum. They resonate with, and reinforce, a culture that traffics in dehumanization while portraying critics and dissidents as dangerous enemies of the state.
The hypocrisy surrounding Trump’s attack on Rob Reiner should not be overlooked. In the wake of his remarks, a number of mainstream outlets, including Time magazine, ran headlines suggesting that many Republicans were offended by Trump’s vilification of Reiner for his political beliefs. Framed this way, the story implies a sudden rediscovery of moral restraint within the Republican Party. But that claim collapses on closer inspection.
What these accounts largely omit is that MAGA Republicans have shown no such concern for civility or restraint when violence serves their political ends. After the September shooting of conservative commentator and close Trump ally Charlie Kirk, MAGA figures were relentless in condemning what they called “political and celebratory responses,” weaponizing the tragedy to demand greater restrictions on free speech and to justify punishing liberal and progressive groups Trump despised. In this context, outrage was not about decency or respect for the dead, but about exploiting grief to expand authoritarian power.
Trump’s offensive language in the face of personal tragedy, then, is not an aberration but part of a well-established pattern. After Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, was brutally attacked in 2022 and left gravely injured, Trump, Elon Musk, and a chorus of MAGA supporters crossed even the minimal boundaries of political decency by mocking the assault. The selective outrage over Reiner thus reveals less about Republican conscience than about the cynicism of a political culture in which cruelty is condemned only when it momentarily becomes inconvenient.
Taken together, these episodes reveal that Trump’s rhetoric is not a lapse in judgment or a matter of personal spite but rather a governing language of power — one that circulates far beyond the man himself and embeds cruelty, selective outrage, and dehumanization into the political culture. This language is not Trump’s alone. It is the language of MAGA politics and everything that enables it, including far right extremism, ICE, reactionary politicians, predatory billionaires, and, increasingly, institutions that surrender their democratic responsibilities in the face of an emerging authoritarianism in the United States. History offers no comfort here. When cruelty becomes routine, and dehumanization becomes common sense, language does not merely reflect violence, it prepares the ground for it. The endpoint of such brutalizing rhetoric is the colonization of consciousness, the normalization of state terror, and the steady march toward targeted persecution, prisons, and torture chambers. To ignore this is not neutrality; it is complicity.
No comments:
Post a Comment