January 29, 2026
Sean Mathews
In effect, the US and its Gulf partners appear to be talking over each other, with the Trump administration pressing Riyadh to fall in line on an attack, while Saudi Arabia is joined by Oman, Qatar and Turkey pushing for negotiations.
Axios first reported the Washington visit, alongside that of Israel’s military intelligence chief.
The US official familiar with the talking points for Defence Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman’s visit told Middle East Eye on Thursday that the Trump administration’s discussions would include how military strikes can reduce Iran’s threat to partners in the region through proxies and its ballistic missile arsenal. The US will also reassure Riyadh about its commitment to its long-term defence and security.
The two Arab officials told MEE there is an expectation that the US is offering “promises” to Saudi Arabia, but they did not elaborate on what Trump could offer Riyadh to secure its backing for an attack.
“Everything I hear from every Gulf Arab country is that this is a really bad idea,” Douglas Silliman, the president of the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington and a former ambassador to Kuwait, told MEE.
“To be brutally honest, he can’t promise the Gulf anything," Silliman added, in reference to US President Donald Trump.
Quiet acquiescence
Still, one Arab official said Saudi Arabia may be convinced to quietly acquiesce to US strikes. Another official said Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has made it clear Riyadh is totally opposed to military action.
It's unclear whether Trump is seeking a public commitment from the Gulf that would denounce their previous statements or covert approval behind closed doors.
The US has troops in Jordan and an aircraft carrier in the region, but may want Saudi approval to use their airspace for contingency planning, a former US defence official told MEE.
Khalid bin Salman is the crown prince’s brother and is widely understood to be his closest advisor.
Saudi Arabia and the UAE have publicly said they will not allow their airspace or territory to be used for an attack on Iran.
Turkey is also on a lobbying blitz. MEE reported that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has offered to host a teleconference between Trump and his Iranian counterpart, Masoud Pezeshkian.
MEE reported on Monday that the Trump administration was weighing precision strikes on "high-value" Iranian officials and commanders involved in the crackdown on protesters. Reuters and CNN both reported the same on Thursday.
But the US faces an uphill task in trading promises for Saudi Arabian backing, current and former US and Arab officials say.
The Gulf states have reached a happy equilibrium with Iran, analysts say.
Israeli and US strikes in June 2025 have weakened the Islamic Republic, giving the Arab Gulf more leverage over it on files like Yemen and Sudan. Arab leaders are also more comfortable with Iran’s current clerical ruling elite than what they assess might result from fresh strikes: an unstable power vacuum or rule by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, experts say.
US weighs precision strikes
The US has undertaken a massive military build-up in the region.
The Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier has been moved from the South China Sea to the Middle East. It carries F-35 warplanes and F/A-18 jet fighters, in addition to EA-18G Growler electronic-warfare planes. It is also accompanied by guided-missile destroyers.
CNN and The Wall Street Journal have reported that the US is sending additional Thaad and Patriot missile interceptors to the region.
Open-source flight trackers have also reported that the US has built up a squadron of F-15 warplanes at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan. The build-up of warplanes in Jordan would give the US options, as the Gulf states resist becoming involved in strikes.
One former US intelligence official told MEE that the Gulf likely hopes its very public diplomatic push gives it some “insurance” against Iranian reprisals if the US does attack.
Saudi Arabia was subject to missile and drone attacks by Iran’s Houthis for years during its war in Yemen. The group is armed and trained by Iran. This week, the Houthis released a video saying they could resume attacks in the Red Sea.
Saudi Arabia was hardest hit in 2019 when a drone attack emanating from Iran hit its Aramco oil facilities at Abqaiq and Khurais in the kingdom’s east.
The strikes disrupted about 50 percent of Saudi Arabia’s oil production.
The current tensions also threaten to impact the oil industry. Brent, the international benchmark, was up nearly four percent on Thursday.
Iran announced “live-fire” military drills in the Strait of Hormuz to take place next week. Roughly 20 percent of the world’s oil passes through the narrow waterway.
“That was a very pinpoint attack by the Iranians with the message: 'we can destroy a big chunk of your export facilities if we so choose',” Silliman said.
He added that while Iran and its allies have been weakened by repeated Israeli attacks, they could still retaliate and “make the Gulf not a good place to live or invest with a couple of low-cost attacks”.
Kyle Anzalone
According to Axios, “The Israelis came to DC to share intelligence on possible targets inside Iran.” Israeli military intelligence chief Gen. Shlomi Binder led the Israeli delegation and met with US officials at the Pentagon for two days earlier this week.
US officials told the outlet that President Donald Trump is still considering an attack on Iran. One official with knowledge of the meetings said Bidner had brought intelligence that was requested by the President.
Late last year, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed Trump to help Israel take out the government of Iran. The President is reported to be considering a range of options to cause regime change in Iran, including high-level strikes and an oil blockage.
Trump has ordered a massive military buildup in the Middle East, including fighter jets, an aircraft carrier strike group, and advanced air defense systems. On Wednesday, Trump renewed the threat to attack Iran if Tehran does not agree to a nuclear deal with the US.
Iranian officials have stated they are willing to negotiate with the US if Trump stops threatening Iran. Additionally, Tehran has ruled out agreeing to eliminate its uranium enrichment program.
While Israel is pushing for Trump to start a war with Iran, other countries in the Middle East are trying to broker a deal. Turkey has offered to host talks with Iran. Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman will meet with US officials in the Pentagon on Thursday. Axios notes that Ryiahd has been acting as a backchannel between Washington and Tehran.
Iran has threatened to retaliate against any attack by striking US bases across the Middle East.
Reuters reported on Thursday that Trump was hoping strikes on Iran would reignite the protest movement. Earlier this month, the President was considering striking the Iranian government and security forces in response to the crackdown on demonstrators.
Trump initially asserted he would attack Iran for killing protesters, but decided against strikes because they lacked enough military assets in the Middle East to deliver a decisive blow to the Islamic Republic and protect American forces from retaliatory attack.
The President has since ordered a massive military buildup in the Middle East.
In an effort to justify the major US military buildup in the Middle East, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the US must be prepared for an Iranian strike on American troops in the Middle East. He asserted that President Donald Trump had the right to launch a “preemptive defensive” attack on Iran.
Rubio told Senators that the US needed a large military footprint in the Middle East because “At some point, as a result of something, the Iranian regime decided to strike at our troops in the region,” Rubio said.
Tehran has maintained that it does not seek war and would only attack US bases in the Middle East if Iran were attacked.
Rubio went on to argue that Trump could order an attack on the Islamic Republic even if Iran does not attack the US. “The President always reserves the preemptive defensive option,” the Secretary of State said.
During a session of the Foreign Relations Committee, Rubio laid out a scenario where the US would strike Iran if it did not dismantle its defenses.
“If we tell [Tehran] we don’t want to see drones from Iran, as an example, pointed at the US or threatening our forces or our presence in the region or our allies’ presence in the region, and they refuse to comply with that, the president does reserve the self-defense to eliminate that threat,” the Secretary of State said Wednesday.
He went on to add that the US needed a massive military presence in the Middle East to “preemptively prevent” an Iranian attack.
The President has reportedly been presented with options for causing regime change in Iran, including high-level strikes and a blockade of Iranian oil.
Sean Mathews
As the Gulf urges the US to
engage in diplomacy, the Trump administration is using a Washington visit to
pressure the kingdom
The US this week is trying to
sway Saudi Arabia to get behind an attack on Iran, one US official briefed on
the talking points for the Saudi defence minister's visit to Washington and two
Arab officials familiar with diplomacy told Middle East Eye.
In effect, the US and its Gulf partners appear to be talking over each other, with the Trump administration pressing Riyadh to fall in line on an attack, while Saudi Arabia is joined by Oman, Qatar and Turkey pushing for negotiations.
Axios first reported the Washington visit, alongside that of Israel’s military intelligence chief.
The US official familiar with the talking points for Defence Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman’s visit told Middle East Eye on Thursday that the Trump administration’s discussions would include how military strikes can reduce Iran’s threat to partners in the region through proxies and its ballistic missile arsenal. The US will also reassure Riyadh about its commitment to its long-term defence and security.
The two Arab officials told MEE there is an expectation that the US is offering “promises” to Saudi Arabia, but they did not elaborate on what Trump could offer Riyadh to secure its backing for an attack.
“Everything I hear from every Gulf Arab country is that this is a really bad idea,” Douglas Silliman, the president of the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington and a former ambassador to Kuwait, told MEE.
“To be brutally honest, he can’t promise the Gulf anything," Silliman added, in reference to US President Donald Trump.
Quiet acquiescence
Still, one Arab official said Saudi Arabia may be convinced to quietly acquiesce to US strikes. Another official said Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has made it clear Riyadh is totally opposed to military action.
It's unclear whether Trump is seeking a public commitment from the Gulf that would denounce their previous statements or covert approval behind closed doors.
The US has troops in Jordan and an aircraft carrier in the region, but may want Saudi approval to use their airspace for contingency planning, a former US defence official told MEE.
Khalid bin Salman is the crown prince’s brother and is widely understood to be his closest advisor.
Saudi Arabia and the UAE have publicly said they will not allow their airspace or territory to be used for an attack on Iran.
Turkey is also on a lobbying blitz. MEE reported that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has offered to host a teleconference between Trump and his Iranian counterpart, Masoud Pezeshkian.
MEE reported on Monday that the Trump administration was weighing precision strikes on "high-value" Iranian officials and commanders involved in the crackdown on protesters. Reuters and CNN both reported the same on Thursday.
But the US faces an uphill task in trading promises for Saudi Arabian backing, current and former US and Arab officials say.
The Gulf states have reached a happy equilibrium with Iran, analysts say.
Israeli and US strikes in June 2025 have weakened the Islamic Republic, giving the Arab Gulf more leverage over it on files like Yemen and Sudan. Arab leaders are also more comfortable with Iran’s current clerical ruling elite than what they assess might result from fresh strikes: an unstable power vacuum or rule by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, experts say.
US weighs precision strikes
The US has undertaken a massive military build-up in the region.
The Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier has been moved from the South China Sea to the Middle East. It carries F-35 warplanes and F/A-18 jet fighters, in addition to EA-18G Growler electronic-warfare planes. It is also accompanied by guided-missile destroyers.
CNN and The Wall Street Journal have reported that the US is sending additional Thaad and Patriot missile interceptors to the region.
Open-source flight trackers have also reported that the US has built up a squadron of F-15 warplanes at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan. The build-up of warplanes in Jordan would give the US options, as the Gulf states resist becoming involved in strikes.
One former US intelligence official told MEE that the Gulf likely hopes its very public diplomatic push gives it some “insurance” against Iranian reprisals if the US does attack.
Saudi Arabia was subject to missile and drone attacks by Iran’s Houthis for years during its war in Yemen. The group is armed and trained by Iran. This week, the Houthis released a video saying they could resume attacks in the Red Sea.
Saudi Arabia was hardest hit in 2019 when a drone attack emanating from Iran hit its Aramco oil facilities at Abqaiq and Khurais in the kingdom’s east.
The strikes disrupted about 50 percent of Saudi Arabia’s oil production.
The current tensions also threaten to impact the oil industry. Brent, the international benchmark, was up nearly four percent on Thursday.
Iran announced “live-fire” military drills in the Strait of Hormuz to take place next week. Roughly 20 percent of the world’s oil passes through the narrow waterway.
“That was a very pinpoint attack by the Iranians with the message: 'we can destroy a big chunk of your export facilities if we so choose',” Silliman said.
He added that while Iran and its allies have been weakened by repeated Israeli attacks, they could still retaliate and “make the Gulf not a good place to live or invest with a couple of low-cost attacks”.
Kyle Anzalone
A Saudi delegation will also
visit the US in an effort to de-escalate tension in the Middle East
Senior Israeli defense officials
met with top US officials to discuss a future conflict with Iran.According to Axios, “The Israelis came to DC to share intelligence on possible targets inside Iran.” Israeli military intelligence chief Gen. Shlomi Binder led the Israeli delegation and met with US officials at the Pentagon for two days earlier this week.
US officials told the outlet that President Donald Trump is still considering an attack on Iran. One official with knowledge of the meetings said Bidner had brought intelligence that was requested by the President.
Late last year, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed Trump to help Israel take out the government of Iran. The President is reported to be considering a range of options to cause regime change in Iran, including high-level strikes and an oil blockage.
Trump has ordered a massive military buildup in the Middle East, including fighter jets, an aircraft carrier strike group, and advanced air defense systems. On Wednesday, Trump renewed the threat to attack Iran if Tehran does not agree to a nuclear deal with the US.
Iranian officials have stated they are willing to negotiate with the US if Trump stops threatening Iran. Additionally, Tehran has ruled out agreeing to eliminate its uranium enrichment program.
While Israel is pushing for Trump to start a war with Iran, other countries in the Middle East are trying to broker a deal. Turkey has offered to host talks with Iran. Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman will meet with US officials in the Pentagon on Thursday. Axios notes that Ryiahd has been acting as a backchannel between Washington and Tehran.
Iran has threatened to retaliate against any attack by striking US bases across the Middle East.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio
claimed Trump has the ‘preventive defensive option’ to strike Iran
President Donald Trump is
considering strikes on Iran, hoping the attack will restart anti-government
protests.Reuters reported on Thursday that Trump was hoping strikes on Iran would reignite the protest movement. Earlier this month, the President was considering striking the Iranian government and security forces in response to the crackdown on demonstrators.
Trump initially asserted he would attack Iran for killing protesters, but decided against strikes because they lacked enough military assets in the Middle East to deliver a decisive blow to the Islamic Republic and protect American forces from retaliatory attack.
The President has since ordered a massive military buildup in the Middle East.
In an effort to justify the major US military buildup in the Middle East, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the US must be prepared for an Iranian strike on American troops in the Middle East. He asserted that President Donald Trump had the right to launch a “preemptive defensive” attack on Iran.
Rubio told Senators that the US needed a large military footprint in the Middle East because “At some point, as a result of something, the Iranian regime decided to strike at our troops in the region,” Rubio said.
Tehran has maintained that it does not seek war and would only attack US bases in the Middle East if Iran were attacked.
Rubio went on to argue that Trump could order an attack on the Islamic Republic even if Iran does not attack the US. “The President always reserves the preemptive defensive option,” the Secretary of State said.
During a session of the Foreign Relations Committee, Rubio laid out a scenario where the US would strike Iran if it did not dismantle its defenses.
“If we tell [Tehran] we don’t want to see drones from Iran, as an example, pointed at the US or threatening our forces or our presence in the region or our allies’ presence in the region, and they refuse to comply with that, the president does reserve the self-defense to eliminate that threat,” the Secretary of State said Wednesday.
He went on to add that the US needed a massive military presence in the Middle East to “preemptively prevent” an Iranian attack.
The President has reportedly been presented with options for causing regime change in Iran, including high-level strikes and a blockade of Iranian oil.
No comments:
Post a Comment