As
conditions that best support life shift toward the poles, more than 600 million
people are already living outside of a crucial “climate niche,” facing more
extreme heat, rising food scarcity and higher death rates.
June 6, 2023
Climate
change is remapping where humans can exist on the planet. As optimum conditions
shift away from the equator and toward the poles, more than 600 million people
have already been stranded outside of a crucial environmental niche that scientists
say best supports life. By late this century, according to a study published
last month in the journal Nature Sustainability, 3 to 6 billion people, or
between a third and a half of humanity, could be trapped outside of that zone,
facing extreme heat, food scarcity and higher death rates, unless emissions are
sharply curtailed or mass migration is accommodated.
The
research, which adds novel detail about who will be most affected and where,
suggests that climate-driven migration could easily eclipse even the largest
estimates as enormous segments of the earth’s population seek safe havens. It
also makes a moral case for immediate and aggressive policies to prevent such a
change from occurring, in part by showing how unequal the distribution of pain
will be and how great the improvements could be with even small achievements in
slowing the pace of warming.
“There
are clear, profound ethical consequences in the numbers,” Timothy Lenton, one
of the study’s lead authors and the director of the Global Systems Institute at
the University of Exeter in the U.K., said in an interview. “If we can’t level
with that injustice and be honest about it, then we’ll never progress the
international action on this issue.”
The
notion of a climate niche is based on work the researchers first published in
the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2020, which established
that for the past 6,000 years humans have gravitated toward a narrow range of
temperatures and precipitation levels that supported agriculture and, later,
economic growth. That study warned that warming would make those conditions
elusive for growing segments of humankind and found that while just 1% of the
earth’s surface is now intolerably hot, nearly 20% could be by 2070.
The
new study reconsiders population growth and policy options and explores
scenarios that dramatically increase earlier estimates, demonstrating that the
world’s environment has already changed significantly. It focuses more heavily
on temperature than precipitation, finding that most people have thrived in
mean annual temperatures of 55 degrees Fahrenheit.
Should
the world continue on its present pathway — making gestures toward moderate
reductions in emissions but not meaningfully reducing global carbon levels (a
scenario close to what the United Nations refers to as SSP2-4.5) — the planet
will likely surpass the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting average warming to
1.5 degrees Celsius and instead warm approximately 2.7 degrees. That pathway,
which accounts for population growth in hot places, could lead to 2 billion
people falling outside of the climate niche within just the next eight years,
and 3.7 billion doing so by 2090. But the study’s authors, who have argued in
other papers that the most extreme warming scenarios are well within the realm
of possibility, warn that the worst cases should also be considered. With 3.6
degrees of warming and a pessimistic climate scenario that includes ongoing
fossil fuel use, resistance to international migration and much more rapid
population growth (a scenario referred to by the U.N. as SSP3-7), the shifting
climate niche could pose what the authors call “an existential risk,” directly
affecting half the projected total population, or, in this case, as many as 6.5
billion people.
The
data suggests the world is fast approaching a tipping point, after which even
small increases in average global temperature will begin to have dramatic
effects. The world has already warmed by about 1.2 degree Celsius, pushing 9%
of the earth’s population out of the climate niche. At 1.3 degrees, the study
estimates that the pace would pick up considerably, and for every tenth of a
degree of additional warming, according to Lenton, 140 million more people will
be pushed outside of the niche. “There’s a real nonlinearity lurking in there
that we hadn’t seen before,” he said.
Slowing
global emissions would dramatically reduce the number of people displaced or
grappling with conditions outside the niche. If warming were limited to the 1.5
degrees Celsius targeted by the Paris accords, according to a calculation that
isolates the effect of warming, half as many people would be left outside of
the optimal zone. The population suffering from extreme heat would be reduced fivefold,
from 22% to just 5% of the people on the planet.
Climate
research often frames the implications of warming in terms of its economic
impacts, couching damages in monetary terms that are sometimes used to suggest
that small increases in average temperature can be managed. The study disavows
this traditional economic framework, which Lenton says is “unethical” because
it prioritizes rich people who are alive today, and instead puts the climate
crisis in moral terms. The findings show that climate change will pummel poorer
parts of the world disproportionately, effectively sentencing the people who
live in developing nations and small island states to extreme temperatures,
failing crops, conflict, water and food scarcity, and rising mortality. The final
option for many people will be migration. The estimated size of the affected
populations, whether they’re 2 billion or 6 billion, suggests an era of global
upheaval.
According
to the study, India will have, by far, the greatest population outside of the climate
niche. At current rates of warming, the researchers estimate that more than 600
million Indians will be affected, six times more than if the Paris targets were
achieved. In Nigeria, more than 300 million citizens will be exposed, seven
times more than if emissions were steeply cut. Indonesia could see 100 million
people fall out of a secure and predictable environment, the Philippines and
Pakistan 80 million people each, and so on. Brazil, Australia and India would
see the greatest area of land become less habitable. But in many smaller
countries, all or nearly all the land would become nearly unlivable by
traditional measures: Burkina Faso, Mali, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates,
Niger. Although facing far more modest impacts, even the United States will see
its South and Southwest fall toward the hottest end of the niche, leading to
higher mortality and driving internal migration northward.
Throughout
the world, the researchers estimate, the average person who is going to be
exposed to unprecedented heat comes from a place that emitted roughly half the
per capita emissions as those in wealthy countries. American per capita
emissions are more than twice those of Europeans, who still live a prosperous
and modern existence, the authors point out, so there is ample room for
comfortable change short of substantial sacrifice. “The idea that you need the
level of wasteful consumption ... that happens on average in the U.S. to be
part of a happy, flourishing, rich, democratic society is obviously nonsense,”
Lenton said.
Each
American today emits nearly enough emissions over their lifetime to push one
Indian or Nigerian of the future outside of their climate niche, the study
found, showing exactly how much harm Americans’ individual actions can cause
(1.2 Americans to 1 future person, to be exact). The lifestyle and policy
implications are obvious: Reducing consumption today reduces the number of
people elsewhere who will suffer the consequences tomorrow and can prevent much
of the instability that would otherwise result. “I can’t — as a citizen of a
planet with this level of risk opening up — not also have some kind of human
and moral response to the figures,” Lenton said. We’ve all got to deal with
that, he added, “in our own way.”
No comments:
Post a Comment