Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/11/world/middleeast/saudi-iran-assassinations-mohammed-bin-salman.html?rref=collection%2Fbyline%2Fmark-mazzetti&action=click&contentCollection=undefined®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=3&pgtype=collection
Nov. 11, 2018
WASHINGTON — Top Saudi intelligence officials close to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman asked a small group of businessmen last year about using private companies to assassinate Iranian enemies of the kingdom, according to three people familiar with the discussions.
By Mark Mazzetti, Ronen Bergman and David D. Kirkpatrick
WASHINGTON — Top Saudi intelligence officials close to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman asked a small group of businessmen last year about using private companies to assassinate Iranian enemies of the kingdom, according to three people familiar with the discussions.
The
Saudis inquired at a time when Prince Mohammed, then the deputy crown prince
and defense minister, was consolidating power and directing his advisers to
escalate military and intelligence operations outside the kingdom. Their
discussions, more than a year before the
killing of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi, indicate that top Saudi
officials have considered assassinations since the beginning of Prince
Mohammed’s ascent.
Saudi
officials have portrayed Mr. Khashoggi’s death as a rogue killing ordered by an
official who has since been fired. But that official, Maj. Gen. Ahmed
al-Assiri, was present for a meeting in March 2017 in Riyadh, the Saudi
capital, where the businessmen pitched a $2 billion plan to use private
intelligence operatives to try to sabotage the Iranian economy.
During
the discussion, part of a series of meetings where the men tried to win Saudi
funding for their plan, General Assiri’s top aides inquired about killing
Qassim Suleimani, the leader of the Quds Force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards
Corps and a man considered a determined enemy of Saudi Arabia.
The
interest in assassinations, covert operations and military campaigns like the
war in Yemen — overseen by Prince Mohammed — is a change for the kingdom, which
historically has avoided an adventurous foreign policy that could create
instability and imperil Saudi Arabia’s comfortable position as one of the
world’s largest oil suppliers.
As
for the businessmen, who had intelligence backgrounds, they saw their Iran plan
both as a lucrative source of income and as a way to cripple a country that
they and the Saudis considered a profound threat. George Nader, a
Lebanese-American businessman, arranged the meeting. He had met previously with
Prince Mohammed, and had pitched the Iran plan to Trump White House officials.
Another participant in the meetings was Joel Zamel, an Israeli with deep ties
to his country’s intelligence and security agencies.
Both
Mr. Nader and Mr. Zamel are witnesses in the investigation by Robert S. Mueller
III, the special counsel, and prosecutors have asked them about their
discussions with American and Saudi officials about the Iran proposal. It is
unclear how this line of inquiry fits into Mr. Mueller’s broader inquiry. In
2016, a company owned by Mr. Zamel, Psy-Group, had
pitched the Trump campaign on a social media manipulation plan.
A
spokesman for the Saudi government declined to comment, as did lawyers for both
Mr. Nader and Mr. Zamel.
The
lawyer flatly rejected the plan, and the businessmen told the Saudis they would
not take part in any assassinations. Mr. Nader told the Saudis about a
London-based company run by former British special operations troops that might
take on the contract. It is unclear which company he suggested.
Before
he was ousted last month, General Assiri was considered one of Prince
Mohammed’s closest advisers, a man whose sharp ascent tracked the rise of the
young crown prince. In 2016, he became the public face of Saudi Arabia’s
campaign in Yemen, giving briefings about the state of the war. He traveled
frequently to Washington, where Saudi-paid lobbyists brought him to think tanks
to give optimistic assessments about the campaign’s progress and he extolled
the Saudi concern for the welfare of civilians.
By
2017, however, the Saudi campaign that General Assiri oversaw in Yemen had
ground into a military stalemate and, despite his assurances, a humanitarian
catastrophe. But his patron, Prince Mohammed, also consolidated his power over
all of the kingdom’s security apparatuses, and he promoted General Assiri to
the deputy head of the kingdom’s spy agency, the General Intelligence
Directorate.
Western
analysts believe that Prince Mohammed moved General Assiri there in part to
keep an eye on the spy chief, Khalid bin Ali bin Abdullah al-Humaidan, known as
Abu Ali, who was close to Western intelligence agencies and suspected of
harboring loyalties to one of the crown prince’s royal rivals.
General
Assiri was dismissed last month when the Saudi government acknowledged
Mr. Khashoggi’s killing and said he had organized the operation. On
Saturday, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said his government had handed
over a recording of Mr. Khashoggi’s killing to the United States,
Saudi Arabia, Britain and France, pressuring President Trump to more harshly
punish the Saudis over the murder.
Mr.
Nader’s and Mr. Zamel’s plan dates to the beginning of 2016, when they started
discussing an ambitious campaign of economic warfare against Iran similar to
one waged by Israel and the United States during the past decade aimed at
coercing Iran to end its nuclear program. They sketched out operations like
revealing hidden global assets of the Quds Force; creating fake social media
accounts in Farsi to foment unrest in Iran; financing Iranian opposition
groups; and publicizing accusations, real or fictitious, against senior Iranian
officials to turn them against one another.
Mr.
Nader is an adviser to the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates, a country
that, along with Saudi Arabia and Israel, has identified Iran as the primary
threat to stability in the Middle East.
Both
he and Mr. Zamel believed that Hillary Clinton’s anticipated victory in the
2016 election meant a continuation of the Iran nuclear deal signed by President
Barack Obama — and little appetite in Washington for a concerted campaign to cripple
the Iranian economy. So, they decided to pitch the plan to Saudi and Emirati
officials, even submitting a proposal to General Assiri during a meeting in
Belgium.
The
election of Donald J. Trump changed their calculus, and shortly after, Mr.
Nader and Mr. Zamel traveled to New York to sell both Trump transition
officials and Saudi generals on their Iran plan.
Mr.
Nader’s initiative to try to topple the Iranian economy was first
reported in May by The New York Times. His discussions in New York
with General Assiri and other Saudi officials were reported last month by The Daily Beast.
Mr.
Nader and Mr. Zamel enlisted Erik Prince, the former head of Blackwater and an
adviser to the Trump transition team. They had already discussed elements of
their plan with Mr. Prince, in a meeting when they learned of his own
paramilitary proposals that he planned to try to sell to the Saudis. A
spokesman for Mr. Prince, Marc Cohen, declined to give specifics about the
meeting but said that Mr. Prince had no discussions with Saudis about
assassinations.
In a
suite on one of the top floors of the Mandarin Oriental hotel in New York, Mr.
Zamel and Mr. Nader spoke to General Assiri and his aides about their Iran
plan. The Saudis were interested in the idea but said it was so provocative and
potentially destabilizing that they wanted to get the approval of the incoming
Trump administration before Saudi Arabia paid for the campaign.
After
Mr. Trump was inaugurated in January 2017, Mr. Nader met frequently with White
House officials to discuss the economic sabotage plan.
General
Assiri’s interest in assassinations was unsurprising but unrepresentative of
official policy, said one Saudi familiar with the inquiry into the Khashoggi
killing. The investigation has shown the general to be a grandiose and
ambitious novice to intelligence who sought to impress the crown prince with
unauthorized schemes for black operations, the person said.
But
General Assiri’s well-known closeness to the crown prince — the general often
joined Prince Mohammed for meetings in Riyadh with visiting American officials
— might make it difficult for the prince’s supporters to distance him from the
proposals, just as the same connections have helped convince Western
intelligence agencies that the prince must have known about the plot against
Mr. Khashoggi.
Moreover,
General Assiri and his lieutenants were meeting with Mr. Nader around the same
time that Mr. Nader was meeting with Prince Mohammed himself, as Saudi
officials have acknowledged. In emails to a business associate obtained
by The Times, Mr. Nader sometimes referred to conversations he held
with Prince Mohammed — also known by his initials, M.B.S. — about other
projects he had discussed with General Assiri.
“Had
a truly magnificent meeting with M.B.S.,” Mr. Nader wrote in early 2017,
discussing possible Saudi contracts. The crown prince, he said, had advised him
to “review it and discuss it with General Ahmed.”
Mark
Mazzetti reported from Washington, Ronen Bergman from Tel Aviv and David D.
Kirkpatrick from London.
No comments:
Post a Comment