یکی از نویسندگان پر
توان ایران که حدود ۷۰ کتاب نوشته و در ادبیاتِ تحقیقی فعالیتهای بسیاری
کرده و زبان شیرینی در نوشتههایش داشت، دکتر ابراهیم باستانی پاریزی بود. او که
سه سال و نیم پیش به دلیل بیماری کبد در سن ۸۸ سالگی بدرود حیات گفت، تا آخرین لحظه عمر
به خواندن و نوشتن اشتغال داشت. اطلاعات تاریخی خود را به زبانی ساده و همراه با امثال
و سخنان طنز آمیزی عنوان میکرد که خواندن وقایع خشک تاریخی را بسیار جذاب مینمود.
زیرنگاشتهایی که در کتابهایش میاورد به دلیل طول آنها، که گاهی چند صفحه را در بر
میگرفتند، بسیار مشهور بودند.
اندیشمند بزرگترین احساسش عشق است و هر عملش با خرد
Wednesday, December 27, 2017
Monday, December 18, 2017
Saturday, December 9, 2017
The Deep State Hiding in Plain Sight
By Bill Moyers and Mike Lofgren
Posted December 07, 2017
Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48374.htm
There is the visible government situated around the Mall in Washington, and then there is another, more shadowy, more indefinable government that is not explained in Civics 101 or observable to tourists at the White House or the Capitol. The former is traditional Washington partisan politics: the tip of the iceberg that a public watching C-SPAN sees daily and which is theoretically controllable via elections. The subsurface part of the iceberg I shall call the Deep State, which operates according to its own compass heading regardless of who is formally in power. [1]
Posted December 07, 2017
Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48374.htm
Rome lived upon its principal till ruin stared it in the face.
Industry is the only true source of wealth, and there was no industry in Rome.
By day the Ostia road was crowded with carts and muleteers, carrying to the
great city the silks and spices of the East, the marble of Asia Minor, the
timber of the Atlas, the grain of Africa and Egypt; and the carts brought out
nothing but loads of dung. That was their return cargo.
— The Martyrdom of Man by Winwood Reade (1871)
There is the visible government situated around the Mall in Washington, and then there is another, more shadowy, more indefinable government that is not explained in Civics 101 or observable to tourists at the White House or the Capitol. The former is traditional Washington partisan politics: the tip of the iceberg that a public watching C-SPAN sees daily and which is theoretically controllable via elections. The subsurface part of the iceberg I shall call the Deep State, which operates according to its own compass heading regardless of who is formally in power. [1]
Saturday, December 2, 2017
احمدزاده و حکایتی که آن شب گفت تا مکتوب شود
«شبا گریه کُنوم، روزا بخندُوم/که تا دشمن ندونه سرِ دردُم»
احمدزاده و حکایتی که آن شب گفت تا مکتوب شود
احمدزاده و حکایتی که آن شب گفت تا مکتوب شود
فرج سرکوهی
و این حکایت که احمدزاده گفت و من این جا مکتوب می کنم تا ابدآلاباد
بر سینه تاریخ ها بماند. ...آن شب جمله بافته شده از کلمات از کتاب درآمده بود.
«جسم» شده بود. در قامت میهمان در خانه ما در تهران رو به روی من و فریده نشسته
بود و بی آن که بپرسیم و بخواهیم از جهنمی می گفت که در زندان، به فرمان مستقیم
امام راحل، بر او آوار کرده بودند ...
آن شب در خانه ما در نگاه او چیزی بی نام کم بود هرچند
همان پیکر و همان چهره بود که در زندان های قصر و عادل آباد شیراز دیده بودم اما
نگاه چیزی کم داشت که شاید بعدتر، و به تدریج، به چشم های او بازگشت. نمی دانم.
دیگر او را ندیدم. در آن شب که میهمان ما بود، هم من و هم فریده که اول بار او را
می دید، می دیدیم که چیزی بی نام در نگاه او غائب است. چیزی از جنس سکوتی که سخن
می گوید، چیزی از جنس سپیدی که بیش از نوشته حرف می زند. غیبتی که از حضور قاطع تر
است.
Sunday, November 26, 2017
Option انتخاب
There
are certain natural resources or properties which are privately owned, such as
land and forest, and sometimes streams and beaches. From the earliest time written history is
found, people have claimed such properties as their belongings, and have fought
over those belongings with their neighbors. Same people got together and
established an organization to protect their group property against others
while eyeing their properties, and called that organization a government. Then,
governments fought with each other in order to acquire properties each claimed
to be theirs. In the meantime, if some crafts or products were made by any,
such as household utensils and weapons, the victor in the war would have
attained those as well, all of which became the property of the winner of the
war. Therefore, private property started from the time one claimed a piece of
nature as his (or most probably hers), and fought to keep it for himself, or
herself. Anything else that the person added to the property, such as buildings
and farming materials, became a part of that private property and subject to
ownership. Consequently, wars are merely an aggression to annex, or for
invasion of someone else’s property. After a while, it was realized that animals,
and then other people could be forced to become properties as well, which
continues to this day in a different shape and form. That is the time slavery,
meaning owning someone else’s labor, was discovered. There have been various
social and political forms that controlled and regulated private property
(specially human as a property), beginning with bourgeoisie, feudalism, and
ending with capitalism at its present form of monopoly, which exists in many
Western countries.
بسیاری از منابع طبیعی به مالکیت خصوصی تبدیل شدهاند، مانند زمین و جنگل.
از زمانی که تاریخ مُدَوّن یافت شده است، منابع طبیعی تحت مالکیت اشخاص قرار گرفتهاند،
و همیشه جنگ با همسایگان بر سر این املاک بوده است. گروهی با یکدیگر جمع شدند و سازمانی را به وجود آوردند که بتوانند بصورت جمعی از مالکیت شخصی خود
دفاع، و اموال همسایگان را تحت سلطه خود قرار دهند؛ و نام این سازمان را دولت گذاشتند.
سپس دولتها بر سر آن املاک شروع به جنگ کردند. در این حین، اگر محصولی نیز توسط اشخاص
تولید شده بود، مانند صنایع دستی و یا جنگی، آن محصول نیز توسط برندهٔ جنگ تصاحب میشد.
بالانتیجه مالکیت خصوصی از زمانی آغازید که شخصی قسمی از منابع طبیعی را از آنِ خود
دانست. هر آنچه که توسط شخص به وجود آمده بود، مانند ساختمان و وسائل کشاورزی نیز قسمی
از مالکیت خصوصی به حساب آمد. بنابر این جنگها صرفا به منظور تحت تسلط گرفتن مالکیت
خصوصیِ دیگران شعلهور گردیدند. پس از مدتی، انسانها به این نتیجه رسیدند که میتوانستند
با نیروهای زور، فشار، و اختناق حیوانات، و سپس انسانهای دیگر را نیز تبدیل به اموال
کنند، که به صورتهای مختلف همچنان ادامه دارد. برای آنکه به مالکیت خصوصی نظمی بخشیده
شود و بهتر بتوان آنرا بطور سیستماتیک مورد استفاده قرار داد (بخصوص مالکیت اشخاص)،
روشهای اجتماعیِ مختلفی از جمله بورژوازی، فئودالی، و سرمایهداری، ابداع شدند، که
هم اکنون سرمایداریِ انحصاری در بسیاری از کشورهای غربی وجود دارد.
Friday, November 17, 2017
Lonliness: Testimony before the US Senate Aging Committee
Testimony
before the US Senate Aging Committee
Thursday,
April 27, 2017
Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience
Brigham Young University
1024 SWKT
Provo, UT 84602
801-422-1324
julianne.holt-lunstad@byu.edu
https://socialhealth.byu.edu
INTRODUCTION
Thank
you, Chairman Collins, Senator Casey, and members of the committee for your
interest in social isolation and loneliness and for the opportunity to present
testimony today. My name is Julianne Holt-Lunstad, and I am a professor of
psychology and neuroscience at Brigham Young University. My research focuses on
the influence of our social relationships on physical health outcomes. In my
remarks, today, I’ll talk about the public health relevance of social isolation
and loneliness, including data on prevalence rates, health and mortality risk,
and potential risk factors. Saturday, November 11, 2017
Alfred Hitchcock
Alfred
Hitchcock
One of
the most celebrated innovations of the twentieth century was the art of movie
making. It was properly named the 7th art, which continues to this
day in its original form and variations, whether on the wide screen or on a
computer, television, or even on a cell phone monitor. Acting is an old
profession, but having it accessible and watching it whenever or wherever one
desires is what movie, film, and clip technology have brought to us. A movie
director is the brain behind the film. Checking the history of movie making
from the beginning, we don’t know the first director, as it started in several
countries and spread out to the rest of the world rapidly. However, we know of famous
movie directors at the time that a motion picture was in its infancy. The most
known movie directors of all times are those who pioneered many of the movie
making standards, such as D.W. Griffith and Fritz Lang. Many of the techniques of
cinema and the art of movie making were as a result of innovations by these
two, and some other internationally known movie makers of the time such as Sergei Eisenstein of Russia, Lumières brothers of France (who invented the art) and
Alfred Hitchcock of England, to name a few.
However, Hollywood’s fame is indebted to some early movie makers, such as Fritz
Lang who started in Germany, and the British born genius Charlie Chaplin, whose
films still bring smile to viewers’ lips. However, when one speaks of suspense
in movies, the name that comes to mind is Hitchcock.
Hariri’s Resignation as Prime Minister of Lebanon is Not All it Seems
November 10, 2017
He certainly did not anticipate what happened to him. Indeed,
Hariri had scheduled meetings in Beirut on the following Monday – with the IMF,
the World Bank and a series of discussions on water quality improvement; not
exactly the action of a man who planned to resign his premiership
Wednesday, November 8, 2017
Trump and Democrats Misread Mandates
November 8, 2017
Exclusive: Neither
the Democrats nor President Trump learned the right lessons from the 2016
election, leaving the nation divided at home and bogged down in wars abroad,
writes Robert Parry.
By
Robert Parry
One
year ago, the American electorate delivered a confused but shocking result, the
election of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, a quirky outcome in the
Electoral College that put Trump in the White House even though Clinton got
three million more votes nationally. But neither party appears to have absorbed
the right lessons from that surprise ending.
he
Democrats might have taken away from their defeat the warning that they had
forgotten how to speak to the white working class, which had suffered from job
losses via “free trade” and felt willfully neglected as Democrats looked toward
the “browning of America.”
The
choice of Clinton had compounded this problem because she came across as
elitist and uncaring toward this still important voting bloc with her memorable
description of half of Trump’s voters as “deplorables,” an insult that stung
many lower-income whites and helped deliver Pennsylvania, Michigan and
Wisconsin to Trump.
For
more than a decade, some Democratic strategists had promoted the notion that
“demography is destiny,” i.e., that the relative growth of Latino, Asian and
African-American populations in comparison to whites would ensure a future
Democratic majority. That prediction seemed to have been validated by
Barack Obama’s winning coalition in 2008 and 2012, but it also had the
predictable effect of alienating many whites who felt disrespected and
resentful.
So,
while the Democrats and Clinton looked to a multicultural future, Trump used
his experience in reality TV to communicate with this overlooked demographic
group. Trump sold himself as a populist and treated the white working class
with respect. He spoke to their fears about economic decline and gave voice to
their grievances. He vowed to put “America First” and pull back from foreign
military adventures that often used working-class kids as cannon fodder.
But
much of Trump’s message, like the real-estate mogul himself, was phony. He
really didn’t have policies that would address the needs of working-class
Americans. Still, his promises of a massive infrastructure plan, good
health-care for all, and rejection of unfair trade deals rang the right bells
with enough voters to flip some traditionally Democratic blue-collar states to
Republican red.
Tuesday, October 31, 2017
When Law and Ethics Collide - Why Physicians Participate in Executions
On February 14, 2006, a U.S. District Court issued an unprecedented ruling concerning the California execution by lethal injection of murderer Michael Morales. The ruling ordered that the state have a physician, specifically an anesthesiologist, personally supervise the execution, or else drastically change the standard protocol for lethal injections.1 Under the protocol, the anesthetic sodium thiopental is given at massive doses that are expected to stop breathing and extinguish consciousness within one minute after administration; then the paralytic agent pancuronium is given, followed by a fatal dose of potassium chloride.
The judge found, however, that evidence from execution logs showed that six of the last eight prisoners executed in California had not stopped breathing before technicians gave the paralytic agent, raising a serious possibility that prisoners experienced suffocation from the paralytic, a feeling much like being buried alive, and felt intense pain from the potassium bolus. This experience would be unacceptable under the Constitution's Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment. So the judge ordered the state to have an anesthesiologist present in the death chamber to determine when the prisoner was unconscious enough for the second and third injections to be given — or to perform the execution with sodium thiopental alone.
Sunday, October 29, 2017
علیاشرف درویشیان
علیاشرف درویشیان در ۳ شهریور سال ۱۳۲۰ در یک خانوادهٔ کارگری در محلهٔ آبشوران شهر کرمانشاه به دنیا آمد. در سال ۱۳۳۷ دانشسرای مقدماتی را
گذراند و سپس برای معلمی به روستاهای اطراف کرمانشاه و گیلانغرب رفت. در سال ۱۳۴۵ تحصیل در رشتهٔ ادبیات
فارسی را در دانشگاه
تهران آغاز کرد و پس از دریافت مدرک کارشناسی، تحصیلات خود را در مقطع
کارشناسی ارشد در رشتهٔ روانشناسی تربیتی ادامه داد و همزمان در دانشسرای عالی
تهران در رشتهٔ مشاوره و راهنمای تحصیلی به تحصیل پرداخت.[۱] او پس از پایان تحصیلات
متوسطه به تدریس در مدارس روستاهای کردستان پرداخت.[۲] درویشیان در زمان حکومت محمدرضا
پهلوی،
از سال ۱۳۵۰ تا ۱۳۵۷ برای نگارش کتاب «از
این ولایت» و فعالیتهای سیاسی، سه بار دستگیر و ممنوعالقلم شد. دستگیری اول وی
در کرمانشاه ۸ ماه به طول انجامید،
اما درویشیان ۲ ماه بعد در تهران
دوباره دستگیر و به ۷ ماه زندان محکوم شد. وی همچنین به دنبال این حکم از دانشگاه اخراج
و از معلمی نیز منفصل گردید. دستگیری بعدی درویشیان در ۱۳۵۳ اتفاق افتاد که منجر
به صدور حکم ۱۱ سال زندان برای او شد.
درویشیان از این تاریخ به زندان رفت و تا پیروزی انقلاب بهمن در زندان ماند. وی
همچنین در اواخر سال ۱۳۵۲ با شهناز دارابیان ازدواج کرد.[۱]
Monday, October 23, 2017
French Minister: Citizens Who Joined Jihad Should Die on the Battlefield – “We Don’t Want Them Back”
By Peter Koenig
October 23, 2017
AP
reported in The New York Post of 21 October 2017, that during ISIS heydays, it
is estimated that about 30,000 citizens from around the world traveled to the
Middle East, mostly Syria and Iraq, to join ISIS / Daesh as jihadi fighters.
This included an estimated 6,000 Europeans, mostly from France, Germany and
Britain, many with immigrant backgrounds. A study found that less than 10%
converted to Islam.
After
ISIS’ defeat in Syria’s northern city of Raqqa, the former ISIS stronghold and
artificial capital of the Islamic State’s Caliphate, about a third of the
European jihadists have returned home, where many are awaiting trial in prison.
Others are free and under surveillance. They are easy fodder for western secret
services to blow themselves up, as jihadists, leaving always an ID behind;
False Flag acts of ‘terror’, immediately claimed by ISIS, through the Islamic
State’s news agency, Amaq. No surprise, though, in case they were
contracted by CIA, Mossad, MI6 et al, to do so.
Sunday, October 22, 2017
Raqqa Destroyed To Liberate It
By Eric Margolis
October 22, 2017
The so-called Islamic State
organization was primarily a bogeyman encouraged by the western powers.
I’ve been saying this for the last four years. I asserted, as a former
soldier and war correspondent, that IS would collapse like a wet paper bag if
proper western ground forces attacked their strongholds in Syria and
Iraq. This week, the western powers and their local satraps finally took
action and stormed the last IS stronghold at Raqqa. To no surprise, IS
put up almost no resistance and ran for its miserable life. The much-dreaded IS was
never more than a bunch of young hooligans and religious fanatics who were as
militarily effective as the medieval Children’s Crusade.
In the west, IS was blown
up by media and governments into a giant monster that was coming to cut the
throats of honest folk in the suburbs. IS did stage some very
bloody and grisly attacks – that’s what put it on the map. But none
of them posed any mortal threat or really endangered our national
security. In fact, the primary target of IS attacks has been Shia
Muslims in the Mideast. Many of the IS attacks in
North America and Europe were done by mentally deranged individuals or were
initiated by under-cover government provocateurs, such as the 1993 bombing of
New York’s World Trade Center. IS was notorious for falsely taking credit
for attacks it did not commit.
Thursday, October 19, 2017
The Indonesia Massacre’s Historic Message
By Jonathan Marshall
October 19, 2017
Fifty-four years after the assassination of President
Kennedy, historians are still waiting to see whether
President Trump will approve the final release of secret records related to
that crime by the Oct. 26 deadline set by a unanimous Congress in 1992 with the
JFK Records Act.
Lyndon Johnson sworn in as U.S. President after John F. Kennedy’s
assassination on Nov. 22, 1963. (Photo Credit: Lyndon Baines Johnson Library)
Senior Republicans in both the House and Senate have called on the
President to “reject any claims for the continued postponement” of
declassification. “Transparency in government is critical not only to ensuring
accountability; it’s also essential to understanding our nation’s
history,” said Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who
chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
قابل انکار نیست
چگونه
منکرین علوم میتوانند بخود بقبولانند که گرمایش جهانی، تاریخ تکامل، و لزوم واکسیناسیون
عمومی دروغی بیش نیستند. برای کسانی که این آزمودههای علمی را باور دارند، چنین
مُنکرینی معمای بغرنجی هستند. بسیاری از اَنان تحصیلکرده و هوشیار هستند ولی هنوز
این دستآوردهای علمی را نمیپذیرند. حد اقل حقایقی
را که با منافع شخصی و یا عقیدتی آنها سازگاری ندارند به کناری مینهند.
Saturday, October 7, 2017
The Addicted Nation
United States is the
largest and the most prosperous market variety of narcotics, and legally
prescribed drugs. A consumer nation that is accustomed to buying on credit, and
working hard in order to be able to buy more of the things that are mostly unused.
As many entertaining gadgets are invented in this country, so are new kinds of
drugs. Statistics are jaw dropping: “The most recent census on drug addiction shows that at least
24 million Americans (9.4%) have used illicit drugs in the preceding month. Of
these, approximately 19.6 million have, or have had, a substance abuse disorder
in the preceding year. This means that nearly one in every ten Americans
has a drug abuse problem – a statistic that would surprise many.” This is merely an
illicit drug problem. The most common drug addiction is through the use of
prescribed drugs. These days, you can buy any prescription drug you desire
online.
Wednesday, October 4, 2017
Americans Can Stop U.S. Role in Yemen War
OCT 04, 2017
Shireen Al-Adeimi
Author’s
note: Saudi Arabia, which launched military operations in 2015, says its
aims in Yemen are to fight Iranian influence and restore the “legitimate”
government of Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi’s, run out in 2014 by Houthi rebels. But
Iran’s influence is heavily exaggerated, and Hadi is not popular. U.S.
involvement has to do with controlling Bab-el-Mandeb strait,
through which 3 million to 4 million barrels of oil travel daily.
Yemen continues to
suffer in silence as the world turns away from its ongoing misery.
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
The Rise of the New McCarthyism
By Robert Parry
Source: https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/26/the-rise-of-the-new-mccarthyism/
Make no mistake about it: the United States has entered an era
of a New McCarthyism that blames nearly every political problem on Russia and
has begun targeting American citizens who don’t go along with this New Cold War
propaganda.
Sen. Joseph McCarthy, R-Wisconsin, who led the “Red Scare”
hearings of the 1950s.
A difference, however, from the McCarthyism of the 1950s is that
this New McCarthyism has enlisted Democrats, liberals and even progressives in
the cause because of their disgust with President Trump; the 1950s version was
driven by Republicans and the Right with much of the Left on the receiving end,
maligned by the likes of Sen. Joe McCarthy as “un-American” and as Communism’s
“fellow travelers.”
The real winners in this New McCarthyism appear to be the
neoconservatives who have leveraged the Democratic/liberal hatred of Trump to
draw much of the Left into the political hysteria that sees the controversy
over alleged Russian political “meddling” as an opportunity to “get Trump.”
Already, the neocons and their allies have exploited the
anti-Russian frenzy to extract tens of millions of dollars more from the
taxpayers for programs to “combat Russian propaganda,” i.e., funding of
non-governmental organizations and “scholars” who target dissident Americans
for challenging the justifications for this New Cold War.
US Provides Military Assistance to 73 Percent of World's Dictatorships
By Rich Whitney
September 25, 2017
For decades, the
American people have been repeatedly told by their government and corporate-run
media that acts of war ordered by their president have been largely motivated
by the need to counter acts of aggression or oppression by "evil
dictators." We were told we had to invade Iraq because Saddam Hussein was
an evil dictator. We had to bomb Libya because Muammar Gaddafi was an evil
dictator, bent on unleashing a "bloodbath" on his own people. Today,
of course, we are told that we should support insurgents in Syria because
Bashar al-Assad is an evil dictator, and we must repeatedly rattle our sabers
at North Korea's Kim Jong-un and Russia's Vladimir Putin because they, too, are
evil dictators.
This is part of the
larger, usually unquestioned mainstream corporate media narrative that the US
leads the "Western democracies" in a global struggle to combat
terrorism and totalitarianism and promote democracy.
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
How the UN Covers for US Aggression
By J.P. Sottile
President Trump opened
his big United Nations week … and his famous mouth … with a predictable plug
for one of his properties and some playful
glad-handing with French President Emmanuel Macron.
Trump also scolded
the U.N.’s unwieldy scrum for “not living up to its potential.” He made a
passing reference to the U.N.’s wasteful use of American money. And he called
for “reform” of the much-maligned
international forum.
It was a stolid prelude to
what will no doubt be “must-see” TV when he speaks to the UN General
Assembly on Tuesday about North Korea and Iran. And it was a far cry
from the way America’s leading “America Firster” spent the campaign lamenting how
unfair the U.N. is to the poor schlemiel we call Uncle Sam.
He is likely to use
his speech to throw a little bit of that same red meat to his base, but his
call for reform falls well short of what his supporters
want … which is an abrupt end of U.S. involvement in the
international body. They are motivated by a grab-bag of reasons that point to
the U.N. being a threat to their guns, their bank accounts and their God-given
freedom.
Trump's UN Speech Was Tailored For Americans That Were Born Yesterday
By Chris Rossini
September 19, 2017
Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47842.htm
September 19, 2017
Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47842.htm
In America, we do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone,
but rather to let it shine as an example for everyone to watch.
Those were actual words spoken by President Trump today at the
UN. If only it were possible to see the thoughts swirling through the minds of
everyone listening.
The words "yeah right" most likely dominated at that moment.
If only the president's words were true. Instead, the U.S. government has been at constant war (both overt and covert) for an entire century. The globe is bursting with American military bases that are stationed around every corner.
The words "yeah right" most likely dominated at that moment.
If only the president's words were true. Instead, the U.S. government has been at constant war (both overt and covert) for an entire century. The globe is bursting with American military bases that are stationed around every corner.
Saturday, September 16, 2017
میرزاده عشقی
میرزاده عشقی (۱۲۷۳ همدان
- ۱۳۰۳ تهران)، شاعر، روزنامهنگار، نویسنده و نمایشنامه نویس
دوران مشروطیّت و مدیر نشریه قرن بیستم
بود؛ که در دوره نخست وزیری رضاخان، به دستور رئیس اداره
تأمینات نظمیه (شهربانی) وقت، ترور شد. وی از جمله مهمترین شاعران عصر مشروطه به
شمار میرود که از عناصر هویت ملی در جهت ایجاد انگیزه و آگاهی در توده مردم بهره
گرفت.
میرزاده عشقی نام اصلیش «سید محمدرضا
کردستانی» و فرزند «حاج سید ابوالقاسم کردستانی» بود و در تاریخ دوازدهم جمادیالآخر
سال ۱۳۱۲ هجری قمری مطابق ۲۰ آذرماه ۱۲۷۳ خورشیدی و سال ۱۸۹۴ میلادی در همدان زاده
شد. سالهای کودکی را در مکتبخانههای محلی و از سن هفت سالگی به بعد در آموزشگاههای
«الفت» و «آلیانس» به تحصیل فارسی و فرانسه اشتغال داشته، پیش از
آنکه گواهی نامه از این مدرسه دریافت کند در تجارتخانه یک بازرگان فرانسوی به شغل مترجمی پرداخته و به زبان فرانسه
مسلط شد.
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
شاهد بازی
چند سال پیش که این کتاب را خواندم
اندوه سنگینی تمام وجودم را فرا گرفت. دلیلش رفتار زشت و به غایت تهوع آور پدران ما نبود، که البته در این مورد هیچگونه
پوزشی پذیرفته نیست. ولی به این دلیل که اشعاری که با آنها از نوجوانی انس گرفته
بودم، و هر سطر آن اشعار باعث میشد که پندار شور انگیزی در ذهنم نقش ببندد، اکنون
چهره ننگینی به خود گرفته بودند، و آن ادبیاتِ دلآرا را به صورتی زشت و پلید میدیدم.
به عنوان مثال در مرجع دیگری خواندم که این شعر لطیف حافظ که میگوید: نگار من که
به مکتب نرفت و مشق ننوشت/ به غمزه مساله آموز سد مدرس شد، آن پنداری که من داشتم
نبود، که چهرهٔ ناز و عشوهگر دختر زیبائی را که برای حافظ شراب میریخت، در ذهنم
تصویر میکرد. دین سالاران البته معتقدند این شعر در مورد پیغمبر اسلام است، که هر چه
را که زیباست به گردن این موجود هزار و چهارصد ساله میآویزند. این نگار غماز در
واقع همان شاه شجاع خونخوار است که پدرش را میکُشد که جای او بنشیند وروزها خون میمکد
و چون حافظهٔ سرشاری دارد و اشعار بسیاری به فارسی و عربی و ترکی در ذهن دارد، شبها
هم پیالهٔ حافظ است!
Saturday, September 9, 2017
The Dangerous Decline of US Hegemony
The showdown with the
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is a seminal event that can only end in
one of two ways: a nuclear exchange or a reconfiguration of the international
order.
While complacency is
always unwarranted, the first seems increasingly unlikely. As no less a
global strategist than Steven Bannon observed about
the possibility of a pre-emptive U.S. strike: “There’s no military
solution. Forget it. Until somebody solves the part of the equation that
shows me that ten million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes
from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about. There’s
no military solution here. They got us.”
This doesn’t mean that
Donald Trump, Bannon’s ex-boss, couldn’t still do something rash. After
all, this is a man who prides himself on being unpredictable in business negotiations,
as historian William R. Polk, who worked for the Kennedy administration during
the Cuban Missile Crisis, points out.
So maybe Trump thinks it would be a swell idea to go a bit nuts on the DPRK.
How History Explains the Korean Crisis
By William R. Polk
Source:https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/05/on-the-brink-of-nuclear-war/
Source:https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/05/on-the-brink-of-nuclear-war/
The U.S. and North Korea are on the
brink of hostilities that if begun would almost certainly lead to a nuclear
exchange. This is the expressed judgment of most competent observers. They
differ over the causes of this confrontation and over the size, range and
impact of the weapons that would be fired, but no one can doubt that even a
“limited” nuclear exchange would have horrifying effects throughout much of the
world including North America.
A Korean girl carries her brother on her back, trudging past a
stalled M-26 tank, at Haengju, Korea., June 9, 1951. (U.S. military photo)
Thursday, September 7, 2017
Revolution and Counterrevolution, 1917–2017
The Russian Revolution of 1917 erupted on the fiftieth anniversary
of the publication of Karl Marx’s Capital. From the
start, the October Revolution seemed both to confirm and contradict Marx’s
analysis. He had envisioned a working-class-based socialist revolution breaking
out in the developed capitalist countries of Western Europe. But the 1882
preface to the Communist Manifesto, written a year
before his death, amended this by pointing to a revolution in Russia as a
possible “signal for proletarian revolution in the West.”1 Yet although a worker-peasant revolution under Marxist
leadership triumphed in Russia in 1917, Russia was still a largely
underdeveloped country, and the revolutionary uprisings in Germany and Central
Europe which followed were weak and easily extinguished.
In these
circumstances, Soviet Russia, completely isolated, faced a massive
counterrevolution, with all the major imperialist powers intervening on the
side of the White Russian forces in the Civil War. “Socialism in one country,”
the basic defensive posture of the USSR throughout its history, was thus to a
large extent a geopolitical reality imposed on it from outside. This was
evident beginning with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, in which Russia was forced
to give up much of the territory of the Tsarist Empire, followed soon after by
the Treaty of Versailles, which sought to isolate it still further.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)