9/21/2026
Amir Hossein Mohaddes
Washington’s blockade is draining Iran’s revenues, but Tehran still decides how the burden is shared. Fuel hikes, weak price controls, and scarce currency for luxury imports risk shifting costs onto ordinary households instead of those higher up the economic ladder.
Amir Hossein Mohaddes
Washington’s blockade is draining Iran’s revenues, but Tehran still decides how the burden is shared. Fuel hikes, weak price controls, and scarce currency for luxury imports risk shifting costs onto ordinary households instead of those higher up the economic ladder.
In September 2024, a lavash
flatbread in Tehran's bakeries cost 500 tomans. A barbari loaf sold for 1,800
tomans and sangak for 3,000. By July 2026, those prices had climbed to 4,000,
7,500, and 8,800 tomans respectively. For lavash, the increase approached 700
percent in less than two years, even though bread remains one of Iran's most
heavily subsidized staples.
Bread prices tell only part of the story. A former member of the Supreme Labor Council's Wage Committee recently put the monthly cost of living for a working family above 90 million tomans. The statutory monthly wage package cited for a worker with a family is about 16.6 million tomans.
A labor representative on the committee observed that for roughly 60 percent of Iranian workers, current wages cover only eight days of household expenses. Debt, savings, second jobs, and the sale of assets must carry the remaining three weeks.
The cost of war is measured first in the bakery queue. Bread, rent, transport, and medicine are swallowing ever more of a collapsing wage. Washington’s blockade has inflicted immense damage, but Tehran still decides how that burden is distributed at home – and why those least able to withstand it are carrying the heaviest share.
The blockade enters the household budget
The foreign source of much of this pressure is beyond dispute. Months of war, tightening sanctions, disrupted trade, and the US maritime blockade have sharply reduced Iran's access to hard currency. Shipping costs have surged, payment channels have narrowed, and foreign companies face an expanding threat of secondary sanctions.
It was estimated in early September that Iranian oil exports had fallen from about 1.7 million barrels per day (bpd) a year earlier to roughly 260,000 bpd.
Tehran presents a very different picture. The Oil Ministry said foreign-exchange earnings from oil sales exceeded $11 billion in the first four months of the Iranian year, despite sanctions and pressure on the tanker fleet.
Officials portrayed that result as evidence that sales and collections were improving. The two claims are not necessarily measuring the same thing: one concerns estimated physical shipments at a particular moment, while the other covers cumulative revenue that may include delayed payments or earlier cargoes.
Yet the gulf between them exposes a familiar problem. Iran does not publish a sufficiently detailed, timely account of export volumes, destinations, discounts, or settled receipts. Outside estimates and official assurances therefore remain difficult to reconcile.
On inflation, the domestic figures are already severe enough. The Statistical Center of Iran put annual inflation in August 2026 at 69.9 percent and year-on-year inflation at 89 percent. For food and beverages, the year-on-year rate reached 127.5 percent.
The average food basket was therefore more than twice as expensive as it had been a year earlier, according to the state's own statistical authority. Reuters also reported unemployment above nine percent as the blockade tightened, while youth joblessness remained much higher. The World Bank has warned that war, import disruption, and mounting fiscal pressure deepen the risks of inflation and food insecurity.
Washington is deliberately exploiting these vulnerabilities. The blockade is intended to choke oil earnings, deter Iran's trading partners, and raise the domestic cost of resistance until Tehran changes its position at the negotiating table.
But foreign pressure does not dictate every domestic choice. Washington does not decide whether scarce currency goes to medicine or high-end vehicles. It does not set rent enforcement, customs priorities, tax exemptions, or the distribution of energy subsidies. Those decisions remain with the Iranian state.
Blaming every domestic failure on the blockade shields those decisions from scrutiny and hands policymakers an alibi when the allocation of scarce resources demands full transparency.
Gasoline puts the burden on the street
From 7 September, monthly gasoline consumption above 110 liters has been charged at 100,000 rials, or 10,000 tomans, per liter – twice the previous third-tier rate. Officials point to daily demand of roughly 145 million liters, well above domestic production capacity, and say the measure directly affects about 15 percent of consumers.
There is an economic case for restraining consumption of a heavily subsidized commodity. Iran's aging vehicle fleet, smuggling, inadequate public transport, and extraordinarily cheap fuel have all contributed to demand. A government facing a widening supply gap cannot treat consumption as though the war had changed nothing.
The difficulty lies in how the adjustment travels through an economy already enduring extraordinary inflation. Fuel is embedded in the price of almost every physical good. Many workers have no practical alternative to private cars or shared taxis, while small businesses cannot absorb repeated increases in transport costs. A price rise aimed at the heaviest users can therefore spread well beyond that 15 percent through freight charges, fares, retail prices, and expectations of further inflation.
President Masoud Pezeshkian's government has leaned toward price adjustment, subsidy restraint, and limits on public spending. A single gasoline increase does not define an entire economic program, and interventionist governments also raise prices to curb smuggling or close fiscal gaps.
When price reform advances faster than wage protection, targeted transfers, public transport, or control over essential markets, the adjustment lands on consumers before the state has built a shield around them.
Wartime prices carry the weight of the blockade. Insurance premiums, sanctions exposure, blocked payments, longer trade routes, shipping shortages, and military disruption are all folded into the final price. When the state allows those costs to pass unchecked through the market, Washington’s economic war arrives in every shop and at every family table.
The design of compensation is just as important as the headline price. A cash payment that arrives after inflation has already consumed its value offers little protection, particularly when the poorest households spend most of their income on food and housing.
Assistance must be indexed, targeted, and paid on time. Public transport, school travel, rural mobility, and small freight operators also require specific treatment because their fuel use cannot simply be dismissed as discretionary excess.
Bread prices tell only part of the story. A former member of the Supreme Labor Council's Wage Committee recently put the monthly cost of living for a working family above 90 million tomans. The statutory monthly wage package cited for a worker with a family is about 16.6 million tomans.
A labor representative on the committee observed that for roughly 60 percent of Iranian workers, current wages cover only eight days of household expenses. Debt, savings, second jobs, and the sale of assets must carry the remaining three weeks.
The cost of war is measured first in the bakery queue. Bread, rent, transport, and medicine are swallowing ever more of a collapsing wage. Washington’s blockade has inflicted immense damage, but Tehran still decides how that burden is distributed at home – and why those least able to withstand it are carrying the heaviest share.
The blockade enters the household budget
The foreign source of much of this pressure is beyond dispute. Months of war, tightening sanctions, disrupted trade, and the US maritime blockade have sharply reduced Iran's access to hard currency. Shipping costs have surged, payment channels have narrowed, and foreign companies face an expanding threat of secondary sanctions.
It was estimated in early September that Iranian oil exports had fallen from about 1.7 million barrels per day (bpd) a year earlier to roughly 260,000 bpd.
Tehran presents a very different picture. The Oil Ministry said foreign-exchange earnings from oil sales exceeded $11 billion in the first four months of the Iranian year, despite sanctions and pressure on the tanker fleet.
Officials portrayed that result as evidence that sales and collections were improving. The two claims are not necessarily measuring the same thing: one concerns estimated physical shipments at a particular moment, while the other covers cumulative revenue that may include delayed payments or earlier cargoes.
Yet the gulf between them exposes a familiar problem. Iran does not publish a sufficiently detailed, timely account of export volumes, destinations, discounts, or settled receipts. Outside estimates and official assurances therefore remain difficult to reconcile.
On inflation, the domestic figures are already severe enough. The Statistical Center of Iran put annual inflation in August 2026 at 69.9 percent and year-on-year inflation at 89 percent. For food and beverages, the year-on-year rate reached 127.5 percent.
The average food basket was therefore more than twice as expensive as it had been a year earlier, according to the state's own statistical authority. Reuters also reported unemployment above nine percent as the blockade tightened, while youth joblessness remained much higher. The World Bank has warned that war, import disruption, and mounting fiscal pressure deepen the risks of inflation and food insecurity.
Washington is deliberately exploiting these vulnerabilities. The blockade is intended to choke oil earnings, deter Iran's trading partners, and raise the domestic cost of resistance until Tehran changes its position at the negotiating table.
But foreign pressure does not dictate every domestic choice. Washington does not decide whether scarce currency goes to medicine or high-end vehicles. It does not set rent enforcement, customs priorities, tax exemptions, or the distribution of energy subsidies. Those decisions remain with the Iranian state.
Blaming every domestic failure on the blockade shields those decisions from scrutiny and hands policymakers an alibi when the allocation of scarce resources demands full transparency.
Gasoline puts the burden on the street
From 7 September, monthly gasoline consumption above 110 liters has been charged at 100,000 rials, or 10,000 tomans, per liter – twice the previous third-tier rate. Officials point to daily demand of roughly 145 million liters, well above domestic production capacity, and say the measure directly affects about 15 percent of consumers.
There is an economic case for restraining consumption of a heavily subsidized commodity. Iran's aging vehicle fleet, smuggling, inadequate public transport, and extraordinarily cheap fuel have all contributed to demand. A government facing a widening supply gap cannot treat consumption as though the war had changed nothing.
The difficulty lies in how the adjustment travels through an economy already enduring extraordinary inflation. Fuel is embedded in the price of almost every physical good. Many workers have no practical alternative to private cars or shared taxis, while small businesses cannot absorb repeated increases in transport costs. A price rise aimed at the heaviest users can therefore spread well beyond that 15 percent through freight charges, fares, retail prices, and expectations of further inflation.
President Masoud Pezeshkian's government has leaned toward price adjustment, subsidy restraint, and limits on public spending. A single gasoline increase does not define an entire economic program, and interventionist governments also raise prices to curb smuggling or close fiscal gaps.
When price reform advances faster than wage protection, targeted transfers, public transport, or control over essential markets, the adjustment lands on consumers before the state has built a shield around them.
Wartime prices carry the weight of the blockade. Insurance premiums, sanctions exposure, blocked payments, longer trade routes, shipping shortages, and military disruption are all folded into the final price. When the state allows those costs to pass unchecked through the market, Washington’s economic war arrives in every shop and at every family table.
The design of compensation is just as important as the headline price. A cash payment that arrives after inflation has already consumed its value offers little protection, particularly when the poorest households spend most of their income on food and housing.
Assistance must be indexed, targeted, and paid on time. Public transport, school travel, rural mobility, and small freight operators also require specific treatment because their fuel use cannot simply be dismissed as discretionary excess.
No comments:
Post a Comment