Donald Trump revealed his support of a new group assembled to
protest certain politically motivated groups who have been marching all over
the nation in the recent months. This morning, Trump called the group he
supported as “White Lives Matter, More”, which he described to have convened as
an objection to the new anti-police protests of recent months by those he
termed as “terrorist affiliated groups”. He further defined them as a grass
roots alliance, organized with his financial backings. Trump will lead this
group in a rally which they will start next Sunday in a block on the north of
the financial district of New York City. He added that they specifically selected
Sunday as the day of their march, in order to respect working people and not to
interrupt daily business of financial district employees. In response to the
question of the possibility of other racial groups confronting them he replied,
“We have already received a permit from the City of New York for this march. We
have further asked New York police to assist us by making a ring around our
marchers with personnel at least as many as the marchers, and I personally
agreed to pay for the additional expenses the department may incur.” When asked
about the group’s philosophy he responded: “we are trying to make a point that
white Americans were the first to call this land their home by sacrificing
their lives in clearing the land off the heathens. Of course, all the newcomers
from Europe were welcomed, in order to flourish and build the land as great as
it looks today. All other groups are immigrants, and they have to live and work
under our leadership.” He concluded by saying that he had invited all major
media to cover the march.
اندیشمند بزرگترین احساسش عشق است و هر عملش با خرد
Monday, January 18, 2016
Tuesday, January 5, 2016
Will the U.S. Fall for Saudi Arabia’s Deliberate Provocation in Killing of Shi’ite Cleric?
By Trita Parsi
January 05, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - There should be little doubt that Saudi Arabia wanted to escalate regional tensions into a crisis by executing Shi’ite cleric Nimr al-Nimr. On the same day, Riyadh also unilaterally withdrew from the ceasefire agreement in Yemen. By allowing protestors to torch the Saudi embassy in Tehran in response, Iran seems to have walked right into the Saudi trap. If Saudi Arabia succeeds in forcing the United States into the conflict by siding with the kingdom, then its objectives will have been met.
January 05, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - There should be little doubt that Saudi Arabia wanted to escalate regional tensions into a crisis by executing Shi’ite cleric Nimr al-Nimr. On the same day, Riyadh also unilaterally withdrew from the ceasefire agreement in Yemen. By allowing protestors to torch the Saudi embassy in Tehran in response, Iran seems to have walked right into the Saudi trap. If Saudi Arabia succeeds in forcing the United States into the conflict by siding with the kingdom, then its objectives will have been met.
Saturday, January 2, 2016
The difference between the Saudis and ISIS
Source: http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/1/2/1465549/-The-difference-between-the-Saudis-and-ISIS
By: GJOHNSIT
Saturday Jan 02. 2016
Can you tell the difference?
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Military to Military
Seymour M. Hersh on US intelligence sharing in the Syrian War
Barack Obama’s
repeated insistence that Bashar al-Assad must leave office – and that
there are ‘moderate’ rebel groups in Syria capable of defeating him –
has in recent years provoked quiet dissent, and even overt opposition,
among some of the most senior officers on the Pentagon’s Joint Staff.
Their criticism has focused on what they see as the administration’s
fixation on Assad’s primary ally, Vladimir Putin. In their view, Obama
is captive to Cold War thinking about Russia and China, and hasn’t
adjusted his stance on Syria to the fact both countries share
Washington’s anxiety about the spread of terrorism in and beyond Syria;
like Washington, they believe that Islamic State must be stopped.
The military’s resistance dates back to the summer of 2013, when a
highly classified assessment, put together by the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, then led by General Martin
Dempsey, forecast that the fall of the Assad regime would lead to chaos
and, potentially, to Syria’s takeover by jihadi extremists, much as was
then happening in Libya. A former senior adviser to the Joint Chiefs
told me that the document was an ‘all-source’ appraisal, drawing on
information from signals, satellite and human intelligence, and took a
dim view of the Obama administration’s insistence on continuing to
finance and arm the so-called moderate rebel groups. By then, the CIA
had been conspiring for more than a year with allies in the UK, Saudi
Arabia and Qatar to ship guns and goods – to be used for the overthrow
of Assad – from Libya, via Turkey, into Syria. The new intelligence
estimate singled out Turkey as a major impediment to Obama’s Syria
policy. The document showed, the adviser said, ‘that what was started as
a covert US programme to arm and support the moderate rebels fighting
Assad had been co-opted by Turkey, and had morphed into an
across-the-board technical, arms and logistical programme for all of the
opposition, including Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic State. The so-called
moderates had evaporated and the Free Syrian Army was a rump group
stationed at an airbase in Turkey.’ The assessment was bleak: there was
no viable ‘moderate’ opposition to Assad, and the US was arming
extremists.
Sunday, December 20, 2015
HR158
Apparently, the new bill, HR158, has puzzled
many Iranians. Those who are familiar with the politics of American government
understand that this bill is consistent with other government policies, and
they can find many other historical instances. Many Iranians, such as the
author of this article, have selected the United States as the country of their
citizenship, because of the democratic values this country is famous for,
through mass media, movies, and international broadcasting systems. The longer
one becomes accustomed to the culture of American society, the more one discovers
a brand of nationalism mixed with some self-righteousness and racism that has
become the fabric of the American society. Children from early school age are
indoctrinated into this type of nationalism.
اچ آر ۱۵۸
به نظر میرسد که عدهای از ایرانیان
از اینکه لایحهٔ (اچ آر ۱۵۸) تصویب شده است شگفتزده شدهاند. ولی ایرانیانی که
به سیاستهای دولت آمریکا آشنائی دارند این لایحه را کاملا در مسیر سیاست کلی دولت
دیده، و میتوانند تشابههای تاریخی بسیاری را به خاطر بیاورند. بسیاری از
ایرانیان، مانند نویسنده این نوشتار، آمریکا را به این دلیل که همواره در جراید و وسائل
ارتباط جمعی و در فیلمهای هالیودی به عنوان مهد دمکراسی معرفی شده، وطن دوم خود
قرار دادهاند. شخص هر چه بیشتر در این کشور اقامت میکند، عمیقتر به ناسیونالیزم
آمریکایی که با نوعی نژاد پرستی گره خورده است، پی میبرد. ملیگرایی از کودکی به
بچههای آمریکایی آموزش داده میشود.
Thursday, December 10, 2015
What Donald Trump and ISIS Have in Common- Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
What Donald Trump and ISIS Have in Common
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar @kaj33 Dec. 9, 2015
TIME columnist Abdul-Jabbar is a six-time NBA champion and league Most Valuable Player. He is also a celebrated author, filmmaker and education ambassador whose life and career are the subject of Minority of One, a new documentary on HBO Sports.
The 2016 candidate has more in common with the terrorist group than he does with America
The terrorist campaign against American ideals is winning. Fear is rampant. Gun sales are soaring. Hate crimes are increasing. Bearded hipsters are being mistaken for Muslims. And 83 percent of voters believe a large-scale terrorist attack is likely here in the near future. Some Americans are now so afraid that they are willing to trade in the sacred beliefs that define America for some vague promises of security from the very people who are spreading the terror. “Go ahead and burn the Constitution — just don’t hurt me at the mall.” That’s how effective this terrorism is.
I’m not talking about ISIS. I’m talking about Donald Trump.
Thursday, December 3, 2015
حاجی ملایری
حاجی ملایری را کسانی که در کسب و کار در سطح
بالائی بودند بخوبی میشناختند. او نه تنها با اعتقاد کامل مذهبی بود و اینرا در هر
حرکت و یا هر جملهاش نمایان میکرد، بلکه بسیار به حرفهاش علاقمند بود. گر چه تجارتش
را از پدرش به ارث برده بود، ولی در کارش بسیار وارد بود. پدر حاجی ملایری با پدر
من در ملایر زندگی میکردند و از دوران دبستان با یکدیگر رفاقتی صمیمی داشتند.
پدرم تا کلاس ششم در
ملایر درس میخواند. چون به تحصیلات علاقه داشت قول داده بود که چنانچه والدینش وسایلِ
تحصیلات او را فراهم میکردند، او هم در مقابل دست خواهر و برادرهای کوچکترش را که
در سنین مختلف بودند میگرفت و آنها را بجائی میرساند. پدر بزرگم نخست با این کار
مخالف بود، و بزرگترهای پدر بزرگ
هم او را از این کار منع میکردند، بخصوص که
شهر ملایر تا کلاس ششم ابتدائی بیشتر نداشت و کسی که خواستارِ تحصیلاتِ مافوقِ ابتدائی بود
بالاجبار باید برای ادامهٔ تحصیلات به شهر بزرگتری میرفت. عاقبت پدرم توانست همه
را قانع کند که او را نزد عمویش به تهران بفرستند. پدر بزرگم هم چند شاهی از
پولهایی را که در زیر دخل ذخیره کرده بود، همراه با پنجاه نان ملایری و یک پیت
روغن و یک کیسه توت خشک به پدرم داد که برای عمویش ببرد و چند صباحی تا پایانِ
تحصیلات در منزل عمویش باشد.
Sunday, November 29, 2015
Huffington Post
Original post's link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting_5658f9b1e4b072e9d1c1f5b6
A documentary about the woman in the following picture can be found at: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-most-hated-family-in-america/Colorado Planned Parenthood Shooting Is Part Of A Frightening Trend
Is this the next stage of anti-abortion violence in America?
Posted: 11/29/2015 09:16 AM EST | Edited: 11/29/2015 11:04 AM EST
A gunman opened fire in a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado
Springs, Colorado, on Friday, the latest in a string of attacks at the
health care provider's clinics this year.
Robert Lewis Dear, 57, who surrendered to authorities after an hourslong standoff, appears to
have been motivated by opposition to abortion. Abortion clinics have
long been the targets of violence, including bombings, anthrax scares
and mass blockades. This year alone, arsonists attacked four Planned
Parenthood clinics in Washington, California, Illinois and Louisiana.
Thursday, November 26, 2015
PEOPLE vs. GOVERNMENT, INC.
Today, we are celebrating anniversary of the day when Indians saved the
pilgrims from starvation, by providing the newcomers with a feast of
turkey. We know this because it is mentioned in our history books and
textbooks, and it is repeated by the media each year. However, the original
Thanksgiving day of 1621 had a different purpose, and today’s celebration is a
harvest day proposed by Lincoln and Washington. Some historians attached the
two events, and even the arrival of Mayflower in 1620 and Indians welcoming the
newcomers by offerings, as the origins of Thanksgiving Day. So, why is the
history we are reading or hearing today is so much different from the truth?
Sunday, November 22, 2015
Thursday, November 19, 2015
Saturday, November 14, 2015
The First Question to Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It a False Flag?
The First Question to Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It a False Flag?
By WashingtonsBlog
Presidents, Prime Ministers, Congressmen, Generals, Spooks, Soldiers and Police ADMIT to False Flag Terror
November 14, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "WashingtonsBlog"- - In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admit to it, either orally, in writing, or through photographs or videos:
Tuesday, November 10, 2015
ماههای سال
هر یک از دوازده ماه سالهای ایرانی
به نام خاصی، عموماً مذهبی، نامگذاری شدهاند. برای آنکه مفهوم این اسامی را درک
کنیم، تحلیل واژهٔ هر ماه از کتاب “دانشنامه مزدیسنا” نوشتهٔ دکتر جهانگیر اوشیدری
که در “شرکت نشر مرکز” در سال ۱۳۷۱ به چاپ رسیده است، در اینجا میاید. شمارههای
داخل پرانتز ()که به دنبال حرف “ص” میایند به شمارهٔ صفحاتی که مطالب مذکور از این
کتاب نقل شدهاند اشاره دارند. مطالبی که مابین دو کروشه {} میایند، اضافات گردآورنده
به مطلب اصلی میباشند، که عمدتاً برای توضیح واژههای ناآشنا از همین کتاب است. در
گاهنامه پارسی، روزهای هر ماه نیز اسامی خود را داشتند. بدین ترتیب که، دوازده روز
از هر ماه به نام دوازده ماه نامگذاری شده بودند؛ و چنانچه اسم یک روز با اسم همان
ماه یکی بود، آن روز جشن گرفته میشد. لازم به تذکر است که این مطالب به هیچ وجه
دلیل بَر صحت گذاشتن به ارکان یا آموزههای دین زرتشتی نیست و نگارنده یا گردآورندهٔ
این مطالب در نظر دارد که واژههائی را که هر سال و به دفعات در موارد مختلف تکرار
میکنیم، ماههای سال، بشناسیم و به ریشههای آنها پی ببریم. گر چه فرهنگهای دیگری
برای این منظور وجود دارند، ولی از نظر جامع بودن، دانشنامه مزدیسنا به نظر مناسبتر
آمد. روزهای ماه به ترتیب زیر نامگذاری شده بودند:
۱. هرمزد
۲. بهمن
۳. اردیبهشت
۴. شهریور
۵. سپندارمذ
۶. خرداد
۷. اَمرداد
۸. دی
۹. آذر
۱۰. آبان
۱۱. خورشید
۱۲. ماه
۱۳. تیر
۱۴. گوش
۱۵. دی
۱۶. مهر
۱۷. سروش
۱۸. رشن
۱۹. فروردین
۲۰. بهرام
۲۱. رام
۲۲. باد
۲۳. دی
۲۴. دین
۲۵. ارت (ارشنگ)
۲۶. اشتاد
۲۷. آسمان
۲۸. زامیاد
۲۹. مهراسپند (مرسپند)
۳۰. انیران (انارام)
Thursday, November 5, 2015
ماه، ماونگهه
ماه در اوستا ماونگهه
نامیده شده. یشت هفتم مربوط به ماه است و ماه نیایش نیز از ماه یشت نقل شده. ماه
هم اسم سیارهٔ معروف است، هم اسم مدت سی روز از سال، و نیز اسم روز (روز دوازدهم
هر ماه) است. در خود اوستا فقط اسامی هفت ماه باقیمانده: نامهای پنج ماه که اردیبهشت،
تیر، شهریور، مهر و دی باشد در بندهای ۷ تا ۱۱ آفرینگان گهنبار، اسم فروردین در یسنای ۱،
بند ۱۱، و اسم اسفند در یک قطعهٔ اوستائی و جرکرت دینیک، بند ۲۱، اما در کُتبِ پهلوی
و در آثارالباقیهٔ بیرونی اسامی ماهها به طور کامل ضبط شده است.
Monday, November 2, 2015
Debunking Common Myths About Bernie Sanders
NOTE: This first appeared in a Google+ Post that can be found HERE. We have done some minor editing but left most of the text as it was originally written.
Here are the most common myths and why they are wrong. And to my fellow Bernie supporters, remember to take the high road. When confronted with lies and hatred, turn the other cheek and respond with facts and love.
Myth 1: Debates don’t matter
Myth 2: Clinton won the debate
Myth 3: Bernie is too far to the left
Myth 4: Bernie is unelectable
Myth 5: Bernie will split the vote
Myth 6: Bernie doesn’t deserve our support because he isn’t a Democrat
Myth 7: Bernie can’t get any endorsements
Myth 8: Bernie is weak on foreign policy
Myth 9: Bernie is a gun nut
Myth 10: Bernie only appeals to progressive white men
Myth 11: Bernie is not strong on LGBTQ issues
Myth 12: Bernie is anti-woman
Myth 13: Bernie is anti-immigrant, anti-Latino
Myth 14: Bernie is racist
Myth 15: Bernie doesn’t have enough experience
Myth 16: Bernie’s supporters are bad for the party
Myth 17: Clinton is just as progressive as Bernie
Myth 18: Bernie won’t be able to work with Congress
Myth 19: Bernie can’t get things done
Myth 20: Bernie is too old
Myth 21: Bernie is a Socialist
Myth 22: Bernie is too far behind to catch up
Myth 23: Bernie can't fundraise
Myth 24: Bernie’s proposals are too expensive
Myth 25: The campaign is over, Clinton has already won
Myth 2: Clinton won the debate
Myth 3: Bernie is too far to the left
Myth 4: Bernie is unelectable
Myth 5: Bernie will split the vote
Myth 6: Bernie doesn’t deserve our support because he isn’t a Democrat
Myth 7: Bernie can’t get any endorsements
Myth 8: Bernie is weak on foreign policy
Myth 9: Bernie is a gun nut
Myth 10: Bernie only appeals to progressive white men
Myth 11: Bernie is not strong on LGBTQ issues
Myth 12: Bernie is anti-woman
Myth 13: Bernie is anti-immigrant, anti-Latino
Myth 14: Bernie is racist
Myth 15: Bernie doesn’t have enough experience
Myth 16: Bernie’s supporters are bad for the party
Myth 17: Clinton is just as progressive as Bernie
Myth 18: Bernie won’t be able to work with Congress
Myth 19: Bernie can’t get things done
Myth 20: Bernie is too old
Myth 21: Bernie is a Socialist
Myth 22: Bernie is too far behind to catch up
Myth 23: Bernie can't fundraise
Myth 24: Bernie’s proposals are too expensive
Myth 25: The campaign is over, Clinton has already won
Monday, October 26, 2015
Thursday, October 22, 2015
SEVEN THINGS YOU DIDN’T KNOW THE U.S. AND ITS ALLIES DID TO IRAN
The relationship between Iran and the US has been discussed by many from
many different angles. This article discusses several points, some of them
visited for the first time. The conclusion the author makes is misleading. The
nuclear deal was made because of the FEAR Iranian government had of the US, as
the US has a large navy in the Persian Gulf, has its military present in battle
posture in the east and west of Iran, and has the north controlled by NATO. In
addition, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other US friends in the area are directly
verbal attacking Iran. The deal was actually submission of total Iranian
independence. In that case, the deal was good for both parties. The article is
copied from the following link:
Homan Square revealed: how Chicago police 'disappeared' 7,000 people
We hear about the people from dictatorships all across the Middle-East suddenly missing and no one knowing of their whereabouts, not even the police. Later on, it is discovered that the person was arrested and released, or just disappeared in the hands of the police itself, or by the security apparatus. It has also been revealed that some people from countries in the Middle-East suddenly disappear, to be found sometimes later in the US prisons across the globe as terrorists. However, one thing that has never been revealed is when the U.S. citizens suddenly disappear, being taken to unmarked facilities by the US authorities, not CIA or FBI (which people tend to accept it as legitimate), but by local police. This is one of such stories. The link below is where the original article is derived from:
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/19/homan-square-chicago-police-disappeared-thousands
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/oct/19/homan-square-chicago-police-disappeared-thousands
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
Presidential Election of 2016
Presidential election started earlier
this time. There has already been two debates; one among Republicans and
another one among Democratic candidates. Republican debate looked more like a
verbal argument than a debate, and candidates made, to put it simply, a mockery
of themselves. The best way to weigh the impact of their debate is to analyze the
result, which put Donald Trump at the top of the table as the most popular
candidate. It is interesting that conservative media tried to discredit Trump
by putting his name with the less known candidates, or not mentioning his name
at all (see http://2016.republican-candidates.org/
and https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
for instance). The Democratic debate on the other hand, was more civil, and the
only ones who were prepared and had had campaigned about their plans were
Clinton and Sanders.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










