اندیشمند بزرگترین احساسش عشق است و هر عملش با خرد

Sunday, April 17, 2016

نمایش‌نامه پروین دختر ساسان

بازیگران:
پرویز
پروین
خانم و آقای ساسانپور
آقای تنکابنی دوست آقای ساسانپور
همایون- دوست پرویز
عاطف- بازیگر و دوست پرویز
علیرضا- دوست پرویز در آمریکا
هما- دوست پروین

(صحنه: خیابان؛ مقابل یک ساختمان بلند مردم در جنبش هستند و به سرعت به اینطرف و آن طرف میروند. آفتاب داغ در چهره‌ها نمایان است. پرویز، همراه با گروهی دیگر عرق‌ریزان از ساختمان برج مانند بیرون میاید)
هوای گرم تابستانِ تهران گاهی‌ ذهن انسان را آب می‌کند. هر چه تابستان کوتاهتر باشد آلودگی‌ هوا هم کمتر است. متاسفانه تابستان سال ۵۷ زود شروع شد بطوریکه در اواسط خرداد، گرما بیداد میکرد. داخل ساختمانها پنکه و کولر بدن انسان را سریع خشک میکردند، بخصوص اگر شخصی جلوی پره‌های پنکه و یا دریچه کولر بدون نگرانی از مقاومت بدن در مقابل سرما خوردگی به تهویه بدن از طریق آستین و درز بین دکمه‌های پیراهن می‌پرداخت. هجومِ شراره گرما زمانی‌ به نهایت خود می‌رسید که شخص از ساختمان خنکی خارج میشد؛ بویژه اگر مثل پرویز پس از دریافت یک خبر بد پا به این جهنم سوزان می‌گذاشت. پرویز حدود دو ماه بود که تلاش میکرد که نمایشنامه “پروین دختر ساسان” صادق هدایت را روی پرده بیاورد. البته این تصمیم را یکسال پیش گرفته بود و نمایشنامه را برای سازمانهای مربوطه فرستاده بود، که موافقت کرده بودند که با یک سری تغییرات بتواند آنرا به نمایش در آورد. تغییراتی را که خواسته بودند داد و نمایشنامه را مجددا برای آنها فرستاد. دو ماه پیش برای دریافت پروانه نمایش مراجعه کرد، که پیش نویسش را با یک سری خطوط قرمز برای تغییرات بیشتر به او پس دادند. در این دو ماه هر بار مراجعه میکرد تغییرات جدیدی را به او تحمیل می‌کردند، که پرویز تا میتوانست به خواسته‌های آنها تن در میداد. ولی‌ آنروز آب پاکی را روی دستش ریختند و گفتند که با توجه به وقایع اخیر، امکان تصویب کردن آثار هدایت نبود. البته به او نوید دادند که اگر سال آینده آنرا مجددا ارائه دهد احتمال دارد که بتواند پروانه بگیرد. پرویز با خشم از ساختمان بیرون آمد و خود را درون یک تاکسی رها کرد و به فکر فرو رفت. طرح‌های بسیاری برای این نمایش ریخته بود، و حتی با هنرپیشگانی که برای اجرای نقش‌ها در نظر داشت در مورد طرحش صحبت کرده بود، و اکنون همه چیز نقش بر آب شده بود.

Sunday, April 3, 2016

جلوه خانم محبوبِ همگان

راویانِ اخبار و طوطیانِ شکر شکنِ شیرین گفتار و خبرچینانِ مردم آزار و بی‌عرضگان و بی‌عارانِ این روزگارِ غدار چنین حکایت کنند که؛ در گذشته‌های بسیار دور در یکی‌ ازسرزمینهای پر سرور، زنی‌ همیشه لبخند بر لب می‌زیست در نهایتِ التهاب، دیدگانی پر نور و با کفایتی پر شور. همانا این زن در میان جامعه مشهور، همچون نامش جلوه می‌فروخت و سخنها بر لبان می‌دوخت و دلها در قفا می‌سوخت. شادی در وجناتش آشکار بود و دوستانش در دوستی‌ پایدار. نه با کسی‌ جدل و نه بر کسی‌ ناپسند عمل، که کرداری داشت به ظاهر سنجیده و گفتاری به ظاهر پسندیده. چنان که کسی‌ هزلی میگفت لبهایش شکوفان و از آنکه غمی را بیان مینمود کثیر اشک چو طوفان، که آنچه از او انتظار بود مینمود، و آن سازی که او می‌پنداشت در دگران مقبول می‌افتاد میسرود.

Sunday, March 27, 2016

خرید کنیز بقیمت هفتاد دینار برای امام محمد باقر


پلیدتر از تمام کثافتکاریهایی که بیابانگردان و وحشی های شبه جزیره عربستان در ایران انجام دادند ، و بدتر از کشتار و غارت و هفتصد سال تاراج ذخائر مملکت و خرابی کشورمان ، هیچکدام از اینها کثیف تر و پست تر از به اسارت گرفتن دختران ایرانزمین و فروختن آنها بعنوان کنیز در شهر مدینه منوّره نبود٠
دختران شرافتمند ایران را ، بفرمان الله مدینه ، در جلو شترها میدوانیدند و آنها را با پاهای خون آلود در بازارها...
ی مدینه بمعرض فروش میگذاشتند و فکر میکنید خریداران چه کسانی بودند؟٠٠٠٠٠ البته ائمه٠
-
از کتاب "راحه الارواح" ( در شرح زندگانی ، فضائل و معجزات ائمه اطهار) نوشته حسن بن حسین شیعی سبزواری به سال ٧٥٧

بهرام مشیری
سرزمین جاوید
ویدیو بمدت سه دقیقه

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=733304923358605&fref=nf

 

Thursday, February 25, 2016

The Apple Case Will Grope Its Way Into Your Future


 
To understand what’s at stake in the battle between Apple and the F.B.I.over cracking open a terrorist’s smartphone, it helps to be able to predict the future of the tech industry.

For that, here’s one bet you’ll never lose money on: Digital technology always grows hungrier for more personal information, and we users nearly always accede to its demands. Today’s smartphones hold a lot of personal data — your correspondence, your photos, your location, your dignity. But tomorrow’s devices, many of which are already around in rudimentary forms, will hold a lot more.

Sunday, February 14, 2016

An Article by Sharmine Narwani on Syria

Will Geneva talks lead right back to Assad’s 2011 reforms?

Sharmine Narwani
Sharmine Narwani is a commentator and analyst of Middle East geopolitics. She is a former senior associate at St. Antony's College, Oxford University and has a master’s degree in International Relations from Columbia University. Sharmine has written commentary for a wide array of publications, including Al Akhbar English, the New York Times, the Guardian, Asia Times Online, Salon.com, USA Today, the Huffington Post, Al Jazeera English, BRICS Post and others. You can follow her on Twitter at @snarwani

Thursday, January 28, 2016

The Washington Post

MEDIA

The Washington Post Just Published Probably the Most Inaccurate Editorial on Bernie's Campaign So Far

The Post, owned by man worth $53.2 billion, really doesn't like Bernie Sanders.
The Washington Post has been on something of an anti-Sanders kick lately. Its latest editorial, Bernie Sanders’s fiction-filled campaign, is somehow worse than its last one, which derided his single-payer plan in tabloid-like terms. It's entirely predictable that an establishment gatekeeper publication like The Post would not approve of Sanders' relatively radical policy proposals, but the degree to which it keeps offering up hysterical, and often times totally disingenuous critiques, is surprising even by its standards. Let's begin with The Post's first claim:
Mr. Sanders’s tale starts with the bad guys: Wall Street and corporate money. The existence of large banks and lax campaign finance laws explains why working Americans are not thriving, he says, and why the progressive agenda has not advanced. Here is a reality check: Wall Street has already undergone a round of reform, significantly reducing the risks big banks pose to the financial system.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

A Message from Congressman Swalwell- and Response

It is difficult to find an honest politician who tells people the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Of course it is not impossible to find one (Bernie Sanders is a good example), but unfortunately they are rare and subject to change. The reason that they can be so outright dishonest is that they don't believe in their constituents' intelligence. Perhaps, some of the people whom they are representing have similar character, but not all are like them, and I dare to say that the majority of people are truthful. I never voted any of the elected officials into their offices and they are representing me without getting any help from me to become an elected officials. Therefore, there is no hard feeling! However, since we they are getting paid to represent me, they have to listen to my voice as well.
When the new restriction for Iranians traveling to the US was discussed behind closed doors, with Obama promising to sign it if it passed both houses, Iranians who became aware of this through NIAC (such as myself) started calling on their senators and representatives. In my case, two of the elected officials in the state I reside did not vote for its passing. The other ones all voted for it and did not respond to my request and others who claimed the same as me. Until today, when I received a response from Congressman Swalwell, as follows:

Monday, January 18, 2016

SALT & PEPPER: CANDIDATES’ NEWS

Donald Trump revealed his support of a new group assembled to protest certain politically motivated groups who have been marching all over the nation in the recent months. This morning, Trump called the group he supported as “White Lives Matter, More”, which he described to have convened as an objection to the new anti-police protests of recent months by those he termed as “terrorist affiliated groups”. He further defined them as a grass roots alliance, organized with his financial backings. Trump will lead this group in a rally which they will start next Sunday in a block on the north of the financial district of New York City. He added that they specifically selected Sunday as the day of their march, in order to respect working people and not to interrupt daily business of financial district employees. In response to the question of the possibility of other racial groups confronting them he replied, “We have already received a permit from the City of New York for this march. We have further asked New York police to assist us by making a ring around our marchers with personnel at least as many as the marchers, and I personally agreed to pay for the additional expenses the department may incur.” When asked about the group’s philosophy he responded: “we are trying to make a point that white Americans were the first to call this land their home by sacrificing their lives in clearing the land off the heathens. Of course, all the newcomers from Europe were welcomed, in order to flourish and build the land as great as it looks today. All other groups are immigrants, and they have to live and work under our leadership.” He concluded by saying that he had invited all major media to cover the march.

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Will the U.S. Fall for Saudi Arabia’s Deliberate Provocation in Killing of Shi’ite Cleric?

By Trita Parsi
January 05, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - There should be little doubt that Saudi Arabia wanted to escalate regional tensions into a crisis by executing Shi’ite cleric Nimr al-Nimr. On the same day, Riyadh also unilaterally withdrew from the ceasefire agreement in Yemen. By allowing protestors to torch the Saudi embassy in Tehran in response, Iran seems to have walked right into the Saudi trap. If Saudi Arabia succeeds in forcing the United States into the conflict by siding with the kingdom, then its objectives will have been met.

Sunday, December 27, 2015

Military to Military

Seymour M. Hersh on US intelligence sharing in the Syrian War

Barack Obama’s repeated insistence that Bashar al-Assad must leave office – and that
there are ‘moderate’ rebel groups in Syria capable of defeating him – has in recent years provoked quiet dissent, and even overt opposition, among some of the most senior officers on the Pentagon’s Joint Staff. Their criticism has focused on what they see as the administration’s fixation on Assad’s primary ally, Vladimir Putin. In their view, Obama is captive to Cold War thinking about Russia and China, and hasn’t adjusted his stance on Syria to the fact both countries share Washington’s anxiety about the spread of terrorism in and beyond Syria; like Washington, they believe that Islamic State must be stopped.

The military’s resistance dates back to the summer of 2013, when a highly classified assessment, put together by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, then led by General Martin Dempsey, forecast that the fall of the Assad regime would lead to chaos and, potentially, to Syria’s takeover by jihadi extremists, much as was then happening in Libya. A former senior adviser to the Joint Chiefs told me that the document was an ‘all-source’ appraisal, drawing on information from signals, satellite and human intelligence, and took a dim view of the Obama administration’s insistence on continuing to finance and arm the so-called moderate rebel groups. By then, the CIA had been conspiring for more than a year with allies in the UK, Saudi Arabia and Qatar to ship guns and goods – to be used for the overthrow of Assad – from Libya, via Turkey, into Syria. The new intelligence estimate singled out Turkey as a major impediment to Obama’s Syria policy. The document showed, the adviser said, ‘that what was started as a covert US programme to arm and support the moderate rebels fighting Assad had been co-opted by Turkey, and had morphed into an across-the-board technical, arms and logistical programme for all of the opposition, including Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic State. The so-called moderates had evaporated and the Free Syrian Army was a rump group stationed at an airbase in Turkey.’ The assessment was bleak: there was no viable ‘moderate’ opposition to Assad, and the US was arming extremists.

Sunday, December 20, 2015

HR158

Apparently, the new bill, HR158, has puzzled many Iranians. Those who are familiar with the politics of American government understand that this bill is consistent with other government policies, and they can find many other historical instances. Many Iranians, such as the author of this article, have selected the United States as the country of their citizenship, because of the democratic values this country is famous for, through mass media, movies, and international broadcasting systems. The longer one becomes accustomed to the culture of American society, the more one discovers a brand of nationalism mixed with some self-righteousness and racism that has become the fabric of the American society. Children from early school age are indoctrinated into this type of nationalism.

اچ آر ۱۵۸

به نظر می‌رسد که عده‌ای از ایرانیان از اینکه لایحهٔ (اچ آر ۱۵۸) تصویب شده است شگفت‌زده شده‌اند. ولی‌ ایرانیانی که به سیاستهای دولت آمریکا آشنائی دارند این لایحه را کاملا در مسیر سیاست کلی‌ دولت دیده، و میتوانند تشابه‌های تاریخی بسیاری را به خاطر بیاورند. بسیاری از ایرانیان، مانند نویسنده این نوشتار، آمریکا را به این دلیل که همواره در جراید و وسائل ارتباط جمعی‌ و در فیلمهای هالیودی به عنوان مهد دمکراسی معرفی‌ شده، وطن دوم خود قرار داده‌اند. شخص هر چه بیشتر در این کشور اقامت می‌کند، عمیق‌تر به ناسیونالیزم آمریکایی که با نوعی نژاد پرستی‌ گره خورده است، پی میبرد. ملی‌گرایی از کودکی به بچه‌های آمریکایی آموزش داده میشود.

Thursday, December 10, 2015

What Donald Trump and ISIS Have in Common- Kareem Abdul-Jabbar

What Donald Trump and ISIS Have in Common

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar @kaj33 Dec. 9, 2015

TIME columnist Abdul-Jabbar is a six-time NBA champion and league Most Valuable Player. He is also a celebrated author, filmmaker and education ambassador whose life and career are the subject of Minority of One, a new documentary on HBO Sports.

The 2016 candidate has more in common with the terrorist group than he does with America
The terrorist campaign against American ideals is winning. Fear is rampant. Gun sales are soaring. Hate crimes are increasing. Bearded hipsters are being mistaken for Muslims. And 83 percent of voters believe a large-scale terrorist attack is likely here in the near future. Some Americans are now so afraid that they are willing to trade in the sacred beliefs that define America for some vague promises of security from the very people who are spreading the terror. “Go ahead and burn the Constitution — just don’t hurt me at the mall.” That’s how effective this terrorism is.
I’m not talking about ISIS. I’m talking about Donald Trump.